These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23425542)

  • 21. Comparative assessment of atherosclerosis of rabbit femoral artery by Duplex Ultrasound Scanning, Optical Coherence Tomography and Fractional Flow Reserve.
    Yang JM; Yao JT; Zhang JY; Wang Y; Sun X; Wang KK; Tian Y
    J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2018; 32(6):1533-1538. PubMed ID: 30574761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. New Volumetric Analysis Method for Stent Expansion and its Correlation With Final Fractional Flow Reserve and Clinical Outcome: An ILUMIEN I Substudy.
    Nakamura D; Wijns W; Price MJ; Jones MR; Barbato E; Akasaka T; Lee SW; Patel SM; Nishino S; Wang W; Gopinath A; Attizzani GF; Holmes D; Bezerra HG
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 11(15):1467-1478. PubMed ID: 30093052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. High left ventricular mass index does not limit the utility of fractional flow reserve for the physiologic assessment of lesion severity.
    Chhatriwalla AK; Ragosta M; Powers ER; Sarembock IJ; Gimple LW; Fischer JJ; Barringhaus KG; Kramer CM; Samady H
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2006 Nov; 18(11):544-9. PubMed ID: 17090819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In vivo comparison of Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasonography.
    Ramesh S; Papayannis A; Abdel-karim AR; Banerjee S; Brilakis E
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2012 Mar; 24(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 22388302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impact of fractional flow reserve measurement on the clinical management of patients with coronary artery disease evaluated with noninvasive stress tests prior to cardiac catheterization.
    Lachance P; Déry JP; Rodés-Cabau J; Potvin JM; Barbeau G; Bertrand OF; Gleeton O; Larose E; Nguyen CM; Noël B; Proulx G; Roy L; De Larochellière R
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2008; 9(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 18928947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Inter-scan reproducibility of geometric coronary artery measurements using frequency-domain optical coherence tomography.
    Orii M; Kubo T; Tanaka A; Kitabata H; Ino Y; Shiono Y; Shimamura K; Aoki H; Ohta S; Ozaki Y; Ishibashi K; Yamano T; Tanimoto T; Yamaguchi T; Hirata K; Imanishi T; Akasaka T
    Int Heart J; 2013; 54(2):64-7. PubMed ID: 23676364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Advantage of next-generation frequency-domain optical coherence tomography compared with conventional time-domain system in the assessment of coronary lesion.
    Takarada S; Imanishi T; Liu Y; Ikejima H; Tsujioka H; Kuroi A; Ishibashi K; Komukai K; Tanimoto T; Ino Y; Kitabata H; Kubo T; Nakamura N; Hirata K; Tanaka A; Mizukoshi M; Akasaka T
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Feb; 75(2):202-6. PubMed ID: 19937788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Safety and feasibility of an intravascular optical coherence tomography image wire system in the clinical setting.
    Yamaguchi T; Terashima M; Akasaka T; Hayashi T; Mizuno K; Muramatsu T; Nakamura M; Nakamura S; Saito S; Takano M; Takayama T; Yoshikawa J; Suzuki T
    Am J Cardiol; 2008 Mar; 101(5):562-7. PubMed ID: 18307999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The reliability of fractional flow reserve measurement in patients with diabetes mellitus.
    Sahinarslan A; Kocaman SA; Olgun H; Kunak T; Kiziltunç E; Ozdemir M; Timurkaynak T
    Coron Artery Dis; 2009 Aug; 20(5):317-21. PubMed ID: 19444091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The prognostic value of combined intracoronary pressure and blood flow velocity measurements after deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Meuwissen M; Chamuleau SA; Siebes M; de Winter RJ; Koch KT; Dijksman LM; van den Berg AJ; Tijssen JG; Spaan JA; Piek JJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Feb; 71(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 18288725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Measurement of fractional flow reserve in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease and borderline lesions prevents unnecessary revascularisation procedures.
    Reczuch K; Jankowska E; Telichowski A; Porada A; Banasiak W; Ponikowski P
    Kardiol Pol; 2004 Apr; 60(4):311-19; discussion 320-1. PubMed ID: 15226780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Long-term prognosis in diabetic patients in whom revascularization is deferred following fractional flow reserve assessment].
    Domínguez-Franco AJ; Jiménez-Navarro MF; Muñoz-García AJ; Alonso-Briales JH; Hernández-García JM; de Teresa Galván E
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):352-9. PubMed ID: 18405515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of efficacy and safety of intracoronary sodium nitroprusside and intravenous adenosine for assessing fractional flow reserve.
    Rudzinski W; Waller AH; Rusovici A; Dehnee A; Nasur A; Benz M; Sanchez S; Klapholz M; Kaluski E
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Feb; 81(3):540-4. PubMed ID: 22961876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A novel approach for quantitative analysis of intracoronary optical coherence tomography: high inter-observer agreement with computer-assisted contour detection.
    Tanimoto S; Rodriguez-Granillo G; Barlis P; de Winter S; Bruining N; Hamers R; Knappen M; Verheye S; Serruys PW; Regar E
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Aug; 72(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 18324698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Predictors of periprocedural (type IVa) myocardial infarction, as assessed by frequency-domain optical coherence tomography.
    Porto I; Di Vito L; Burzotta F; Niccoli G; Trani C; Leone AM; Biasucci LM; Vergallo R; Limbruno U; Crea F
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Feb; 5(1):89-96, S1-6. PubMed ID: 22298799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Adequacy of intracoronary versus intravenous adenosine-induced maximal coronary hyperemia for fractional flow reserve measurements.
    Jeremias A; Whitbourn RJ; Filardo SD; Fitzgerald PJ; Cohen DJ; Tuzcu EM; Anderson WD; Abizaid AA; Mintz GS; Yeung AC; Kern MJ; Yock PG
    Am Heart J; 2000 Oct; 140(4):651-7. PubMed ID: 11011341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of acute myocardial infarction on the utility of fractional flow reserve for the physiologic assessment of the severity of coronary artery narrowing.
    McClish JC; Ragosta M; Powers ER; Barringhaus KG; Gimple LW; Fischer J; Garnett J; Siadaty M; Sarembock IJ; Samady H
    Am J Cardiol; 2004 May; 93(9):1102-6. PubMed ID: 15110200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study.
    Pijls NH; Fearon WF; Tonino PA; Siebert U; Ikeno F; Bornschein B; van't Veer M; Klauss V; Manoharan G; Engstrøm T; Oldroyd KG; Ver Lee PN; MacCarthy PA; De Bruyne B;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2010 Jul; 56(3):177-84. PubMed ID: 20537493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of changes in contractility on pressure drop coefficient and fractional flow reserve in a porcine model.
    Kolli KK; Banerjee RK; Peelukhana SV; Effat MA; Leesar MA; Arif I; Schneeberger EW; Succop P; Gottliebson WM; Helmy TA
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2012 Jan; 24(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 22210582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.
    Ko BS; Cameron JD; Meredith IT; Leung M; Antonis PR; Nasis A; Crossett M; Hope SA; Lehman SJ; Troupis J; DeFrance T; Seneviratne SK
    Eur Heart J; 2012 Jan; 33(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 21810860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.