These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

51 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2342672)

  • 21. Pattern of participation in a cohort aged 50-60 years at first invitation to the service-screening programme with mammography in Stockholm county, Sweden.
    Törnberg S; Kemetli L; Svane G; Rosén M; Stenbeck M; Nyström L
    Prev Med; 2005; 41(3-4):728-33. PubMed ID: 16137757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Women's attitudes to and awareness of smear testing and cervical cancer.
    Yu CK; Rymer J
    Br J Fam Plann; 1998 Jan; 23(4):127-33. PubMed ID: 9882766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Can Flemish women in semi-rural areas be motivated to attend organized breast cancer screening?
    Van Hal G; Matthyssen M; Thibaut A; Weyler J
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1999 Apr; 47(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 10367299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A survey of urban and rural participants in the Otago-Southland pilot breast cancer screening programme.
    Richardson AK; Elwood JM; McNoe B; Bang E
    N Z Med J; 1994 Feb; 107(971):36-8. PubMed ID: 8302502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Who has regular mammograms? Effects of knowledge, beliefs, socioeconomic status, and health-related factors.
    Achat H; Close G; Taylor R
    Prev Med; 2005 Jul; 41(1):312-20. PubMed ID: 15917027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Participation of regional inhabitants in cancer screening].
    Morio S; Nakayama H; Okamoto N; Tanaka T; Takigawa Y; Tsushima S; Sato T
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 1990 Aug; 37(8):559-68. PubMed ID: 2132383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Satisfaction and expectations of the women participants and not participants in the breast cancer screening programme in Barcelona after 10 years of operation].
    Serral Cano G; Puigpinós I Riera R; Robles Garrido I; Pons-Vigués M; Borrell C
    Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2010; 84(6):717-29. PubMed ID: 21327308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Factors affecting participation in mammography screening.
    McNoe B; Richardson AK; Elwood JM
    N Z Med J; 1996 Sep; 109(1030):359-61. PubMed ID: 8890861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Distance to screening site and non-participation in screening for breast cancer: a population-based study.
    Jensen LF; Pedersen AF; Andersen B; Fenger-Grøn M; Vedsted P
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2014 Jun; 36(2):292-9. PubMed ID: 23885026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effectiveness of invitations from general practitioners in recruiting women to mammographic screening.
    Dorsch MM; Cheok F; Ingham HM
    Med J Aust; 1991 Nov; 155(9):623-5. PubMed ID: 1943962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Information about low participation in cancer screening demotivates other people.
    Sieverding M; Decker S; Zimmermann F
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Jul; 21(7):941-3. PubMed ID: 20534782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Recruitment activities and sociodemographic factors that predict attendance at a mammographic screening program.
    Hurley SF; Huggins RM; Jolley DJ; Reading D
    Am J Public Health; 1994 Oct; 84(10):1655-8. PubMed ID: 7943490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Non-Participation in Breast Cancer Screening in Spain and Potential Application in the Present and Future: A Cross Sectional Study.
    Muñoz-Sanz JJ; Jiménez-Palomares M; Garrido-Ardila EM; Rodríguez-Mansilla J
    Cancers (Basel); 2021 Aug; 13(17):. PubMed ID: 34503140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Does the frame affect the picture? A study into how attitudes to screening for cancer are affected by the way benefits are expressed.
    Sarfati D; Howden-Chapman P; Woodward A; Salmond C
    J Med Screen; 1998; 5(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 9795874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Strategies to increase mammography utilization among community health center visitors. Improving awareness, accessibility, and affordability.
    Lane DS; Burg MA
    Med Care; 1993 Feb; 31(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 8433579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Giving patients choice of appointment length.
    Sampson R
    Br J Gen Pract; 2017 Apr; 67(657):159. PubMed ID: 28360056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Participation of Women in Clinical Trials: Not Yet Time to Rest on Our Laurels.
    Pilote L; Raparelli V
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2018 May; 71(18):1970-1972. PubMed ID: 29724349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. More women found to have missed cervical screening invitations in new Capita "administrative error".
    Torjesen I
    BMJ; 2019 Jul; 366():l4777. PubMed ID: 31324605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Interventions to increase the participation of women in physics.
    Dresselhaus MS; Franz JR; Clark BC
    Science; 1994 Mar; 263(5152):1392-3. PubMed ID: 17776509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A randomised trial of weekend and evening breast screening appointments.
    Offman J; Wilson M; Lamont M; Birke H; Kutt E; Marriage S; Loughrey Y; Hudson S; Hartley A; Smith J; Eckersley B; Dungey F; Parmar D; Patnick J; Duffy SW
    Br J Cancer; 2013 Aug; 109(3):597-602. PubMed ID: 23867998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.