165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23427762)
1. Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and TRUS-biopsy accuracy in potential candidates for PRIAS active surveillance protocol.
Lacetera V; Galosi AB; Cantoro U; Catanzariti F; Mazzaferro D; Cantoro D; Quaresima L; Conti A; Raquban R; Montironi R; Muzzonigro G
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2012 Dec; 84(4):272-5. PubMed ID: 23427762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.
Keefe DT; Schieda N; El Hallani S; Breau RH; Morash C; Robertson SJ; Mai KT; Belanger EC; Flood TA
Virchows Arch; 2015 Oct; 467(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 26229020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cancer Location in Upgrading and Detection after Transperineal Template-Guided Mapping Biopsy for Patients in Active Surveillance and Negative Transrectal Ultrasonography-Guided Prostate Biopsy.
Lee CU; Sung SH; Jang CT; Kang M; Sung HH; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Lee HM; Jeon HG
Urol Int; 2019; 103(3):262-269. PubMed ID: 31269509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Further reduction of disqualification rates by additional MRI-targeted biopsy with transperineal saturation biopsy compared with standard 12-core systematic biopsies for the selection of prostate cancer patients for active surveillance.
Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Bonekamp D; Freitag MT; Wolf MB; Alt CD; Hatiboglu G; Boxler S; Pahernik S; Roth W; Roethke MC; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2016 Sep; 19(3):283-91. PubMed ID: 27184812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Standardized Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reporting Using the Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation Criteria and Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion with Transperineal Saturation Biopsy to Select Men on Active Surveillance.
Dieffenbacher S; Nyarangi-Dix J; Giganti F; Bonekamp D; Kesch C; Müller-Wolf MB; Schütz V; Gasch C; Hatiboglu G; Hauffe M; Stenzinger A; Duensing S; Schlemmer HP; Moore CM; Hohenfellner M; Radtke JP
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Jan; 7(1):102-110. PubMed ID: 30878348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance imaging-transectal ultrasound image-fusion biopsies accurately characterize the index tumor: correlation with step-sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens in 135 patients.
Baco E; Ukimura O; Rud E; Vlatkovic L; Svindland A; Aron M; Palmer S; Matsugasumi T; Marien A; Bernhard JC; Rewcastle JC; Eggesbø HB; Gill IS
Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):787-94. PubMed ID: 25240973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy does not reliably identify dominant cancer location in men with low-risk prostate cancer.
Washington SL; Bonham M; Whitson JM; Cowan JE; Carroll PR
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 22077660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Localising prostate cancer: comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and 3D-MR spectroscopic imaging with transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy.
Goris Gbenou MC; Peltier A; Addla SK; Lemort M; Bollens R; Larsimont D; Roumeguère T; Schulman CC; van Velthoven R
Urol Int; 2012; 88(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 22004874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The clinical utility of transperineal template-guided saturation prostate biopsy for risk stratification after transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy.
Song W; Kang M; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Lee HM; Jeon HG
Investig Clin Urol; 2019 Nov; 60(6):454-462. PubMed ID: 31692988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes of transrectal ultrasound scan of the prostate with sector biopsies for 323 New Zealand men with suspicion of prostate cancer.
Smart R
N Z Med J; 1999 Dec; 112(1101):465-9. PubMed ID: 10678211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Histologic upgrading in patients eligible for active surveillance on saturation biopsy.
Chung PH; Darwish OM; Roehrborn CG; Kapur P; Lotan Y
Can J Urol; 2015 Feb; 22(1):7656-60. PubMed ID: 25694015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is transperineal prostate biopsy more accurate than transrectal biopsy in determining final Gleason score and clinical risk category? A comparative analysis.
Scott S; Samaratunga H; Chabert C; Breckenridge M; Gianduzzo T
BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116 Suppl 3():26-30. PubMed ID: 26260531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A biopsy simulation study to assess the accuracy of several transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-biopsy strategies compared with template prostate mapping biopsies in patients who have undergone radical prostatectomy.
Hu Y; Ahmed HU; Carter T; Arumainayagam N; Lecornet E; Barzell W; Freeman A; Nevoux P; Hawkes DJ; Villers A; Emberton M; Barratt DC
BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):812-20. PubMed ID: 22394583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of TRUS and combined MRI-targeted plus systematic prostate biopsy for the concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology.
Aslan G; Çelik S; Sözen S; Akdoğan B; İzol V; Yücel Bilen C; Sahin B; Türkeri L;
Int J Clin Pract; 2021 Mar; 75(3):e13797. PubMed ID: 33113261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk prostate cancer meeting the Prostate Cancer International: Active Surveillance criteria.
Mitsuzuka K; Narita S; Koie T; Kaiho Y; Tsuchiya N; Yoneyama T; Kakoi N; Kawamura S; Tochigi T; Habuchi T; Ohyama C; Arai Y
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):914-20. PubMed ID: 23320782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection rate for significant cancer at confirmatory biopsy in men enrolled in Active Surveillance protocol: 20 cores vs 30 cores vs MRI/TRUS fusion prostate biopsy.
Pepe P; Cimino S; Garufi A; Priolo G; Russo GI; Giardina R; Reale G; Barbera M; Panella P; Pennisi M; Morgia G
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2016 Dec; 88(4):300-303. PubMed ID: 28073197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pathological Concordance between Prostate Biopsies and Radical Prostatectomy Using Transperineal Sector Mapping Biopsies: Validation and Comparison with Transrectal Biopsies.
Marra G; Eldred-Evans D; Challacombe B; Van Hemelrijck M; Polson A; Pomplun S; Foster CS; Brown C; Cahill D; Gontero P; Popert R; Muir G
Urol Int; 2017; 99(2):168-176. PubMed ID: 28768264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Value of perineal HistoScanning™ template-guided prostate biopsy].
Hamann MF; Hamann C; Olzem D; Trettel A; Juenemann KP; Naumann CM
Urologe A; 2015 Nov; 54(11):1596, 1598-601. PubMed ID: 25794587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can Power Doppler enhanced transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy improve prostate cancer detection on first and repeat prostate biopsy?
Remzi M; Dobrovits M; Reissigl A; Ravery V; Waldert M; Wiunig C; Fong YK; Djavan B;
Eur Urol; 2004 Oct; 46(4):451-6. PubMed ID: 15363559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of transrectal saturation biopsy in tumour localization: pathological correlation after retropubic radical prostatectomy and implication for focal ablative therapy.
Abdollah F; Scattoni V; Raber M; Roscigno M; Briganti A; Suardi N; Gallina A; Capitanio U; Freschi M; Salonia A; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
BJU Int; 2011 Aug; 108(3):366-71. PubMed ID: 21087451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
