These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2342791)

  • 21. Visual acuity with reversed-contrast charts: II. Clinical investigation.
    Westheimer G; Chu P; Huang W; Tran T; Dister R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Nov; 80(11):749-52. PubMed ID: 14627941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Slope of psychometric functions and termination rule analysis for low contrast acuity charts.
    Carkeet A; Bailey IL
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Mar; 37(2):118-127. PubMed ID: 28211180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Repeatability of the Waterloo Four-Contrast LogMAR Visual Acuity chart and Near Vision Test card on a group of normal young adults.
    Cho P; Woo GC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Sep; 24(5):427-35. PubMed ID: 15315657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effects of blur and eccentric viewing on adult acuity for pediatric tests: implications for amblyopia detection.
    Formankiewicz MA; Waugh SJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Oct; 54(10):6934-43. PubMed ID: 24071956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Computer monitor pixellation and Sloan letter visual acuity measurement.
    Carkeet A; Lister LJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Mar; 38(2):144-151. PubMed ID: 29280165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The technique, validity and clinical use of the sweep VEP.
    Almoqbel F; Leat SJ; Irving E
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Sep; 28(5):393-403. PubMed ID: 18761477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Grating visual acuity with Teller cards compared with Snellen visual acuity in literate patients.
    Kushner BJ; Lucchese NJ; Morton GV
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1995 Apr; 113(4):485-93. PubMed ID: 7710400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of spherical and astigmatic defocus on acuity and contrast sensitivity: a comparison of three clinical charts.
    Bradley A; Thomas T; Kalaher M; Hoerres M
    Optom Vis Sci; 1991 Jun; 68(6):418-26. PubMed ID: 1891193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Visual acuity with reversed-contrast charts: I. Theoretical and psychophysical investigations.
    Westheimer G
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Nov; 80(11):745-8. PubMed ID: 14627940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity testing for sports vision.
    Zimmerman AB; Lust KL; Bullimore MA
    Eye Contact Lens; 2011 May; 37(3):153-9. PubMed ID: 21378574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Correlation of optotypes with the Landolt ring--a fresh look at the comparability of optotypes.
    Grimm W; Rassow B; Wesemann W; Saur K; Hilz R
    Optom Vis Sci; 1994 Jan; 71(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8146001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visual acuity and its measurement.
    Kniestedt C; Stamper RL
    Ophthalmol Clin North Am; 2003 Jun; 16(2):155-70, v. PubMed ID: 12809155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Can the visual acuity of infants be predicted from a measurement of contrast sensitivity?
    Adams RJ; Courage ML
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2003; 40(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 12580270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of cataract surgery on contrast sensitivity and glare in patients with 20/50 or better Snellen acuity.
    Pfoff DS; Werner JS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1994 Nov; 20(6):620-5. PubMed ID: 7837072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Optical defocus: differential effects on size and contrast letter recognition thresholds.
    Rabin J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1994 Feb; 35(2):646-8. PubMed ID: 8113015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Measurement of visual acuity with two different charts; a comparison of results and repeatability in patients with cataract.
    van den Brom HJ; Kooijman AC; Blanksma LJ; van Rij G
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1995; 90(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 8549244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Contour interaction for high and low contrast optotypes in normal and amblyopic observers.
    Simmers AJ; Gray LS; McGraw PV; Winn B
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1999 May; 19(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 10627844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The SKILL Card. An acuity test of reduced luminance and contrast. Smith-Kettlewell Institute Low Luminance.
    Haegerstrom-Portnoy G; Brabyn J; Schneck ME; Jampolsky A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Jan; 38(1):207-18. PubMed ID: 9008645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Contrast sensitivity for letter optotypes vs. gratings under conditions biased toward parvocellular and magnocellular pathways.
    McAnany JJ; Alexander KR
    Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(10):1574-84. PubMed ID: 16213001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The use of computerized contrast sensitivity, Arden gratings and low contrast letter charts in the assessment of amblyopia.
    Brown VA; Doran RM; Woodhouse JM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1987; 7(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 3658423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.