These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23428250)
21. Sutures versus staples for skin closure in orthopaedic surgery: meta-analysis. Smith TO; Sexton D; Mann C; Donell S BMJ; 2010 Mar; 340():c1199. PubMed ID: 20234041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Subcuticular sutures reduce surgical site infection after repeat liver resection: a matched cohort analysis. Yamazaki S; Takayama T; Matsuno Y; Mitsuka Y; Yoshida N; Moriguchi M; Higaki T Biosci Trends; 2021 Jan; 14(6):422-427. PubMed ID: 32999135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparative study of skin closure in hip surgery. Clayer M; Southwood RT Aust N Z J Surg; 1991 May; 61(5):363-5. PubMed ID: 2025190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A double-blinded randomised controlled trial - do subcuticular non-absorbable skin sutures have a better aesthetic outcome than skin staples in large wound closures? Agilinko J; Tan P GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW; 2019; 8():Doc16. PubMed ID: 31815085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Running closure of clean and contaminated abdominal wounds using a synthetic monofilament absorbable looped suture. Iwase K; Higaki J; Tanaka Y; Kondoh H; Yoshikawa M; Kamiike W Surg Today; 1999; 29(9):874-9. PubMed ID: 10489128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Experimental studies in swine for measurement of suture extrusion. Drake DB; Rodeheaver PF; Edlich RF; Rodeheaver GT J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2004; 14(3):251-9. PubMed ID: 15301668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of incision closures with subcuticular and percutaneous staples. Dresner HS; Hilger PA Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2009; 11(5):320-6. PubMed ID: 19797094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after open gastrointestinal surgery: a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Tsujinaka T; Yamamoto K; Fujita J; Endo S; Kawada J; Nakahira S; Shimokawa T; Kobayashi S; Yamasaki M; Akamaru Y; Miyamoto A; Mizushima T; Shimizu J; Umeshita K; Ito T; Doki Y; Mori M; Lancet; 2013 Sep; 382(9898):1105-12. PubMed ID: 24075050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Wound complications in joint arthroplasty: comparing traditional and modern methods of skin closure. Patel RM; Cayo M; Patel A; Albarillo M; Puri L Orthopedics; 2012 May; 35(5):e641-6. PubMed ID: 22588404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Skin closure with subcuticular absorbable staples after cesarean section is associated with decreased analgesic use. Nitsche J; Howell C; Howell T Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Apr; 285(4):979-83. PubMed ID: 22037686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Scientific basis for the selection of surgical staples and tissue adhesives for closure of skin wounds. Edlich RF; Gubler K; Stevens HS; Wallis AG; Clark JJ; Dahlstrom JJ; Rhoads SK; Long WB J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol; 2010; 29(4):327-37. PubMed ID: 21284596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Wound complications in obese women after cesarean: a comparison of staples versus subcuticular suture. Zaki MN; Truong M; Pyra M; Kominiarek MA; Irwin T J Perinatol; 2016 Oct; 36(10):819-22. PubMed ID: 27253895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Figueroa D; Jauk VC; Szychowski JM; Garner R; Biggio JR; Andrews WW; Hauth J; Tita AT Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 121(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23262925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Staples versus subcuticular suture for cesarean skin closure in obese women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Han D; Feng L; Xu L; Li C; Zhang Q J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Oct; 51(8):102420. PubMed ID: 35688324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery. Basha SL; Rochon ML; Quiñones JN; Coassolo KM; Rust OA; Smulian JC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 203(3):285.e1-8. PubMed ID: 20816153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Closure of laparotomy wounds: skin staples versus sutures. Ranaboldo CJ; Rowe-Jones DC Br J Surg; 1992 Nov; 79(11):1172-3. PubMed ID: 1467895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Randomized controlled trial comparing subcuticular absorbable suture with conventional interrupted suture for wound closure at elective operation of colon cancer. Tanaka A; Sadahiro S; Suzuki T; Okada K; Saito G Surgery; 2014 Mar; 155(3):486-92. PubMed ID: 24439741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Renal transplant incision closure using new absorbable subcuticular staple device. Tellis VA Clin Transplant; 2007; 21(3):410-2. PubMed ID: 17488393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Wound Complication Rates After Staples or Suture for Midline Vertical Skin Closure in Obese Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Kuroki LM; Mullen MM; Massad LS; Wu N; Liu J; Mutch DG; Powell MA; Hagemann AR; Thaker PH; McCourt CK; Novetsky AP Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 130(1):91-99. PubMed ID: 28594761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]