409 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23428438)
1. The effects of visual realism on search tasks in mixed reality simulation.
Lee C; Rincon GA; Meyer G; Höllerer T; Bowman DA
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2013 Apr; 19(4):547-56. PubMed ID: 23428438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of the MR simulation approach for evaluating the effects of immersion on visual analysis of volume data.
Laha B; Bowman DA; Schiffbauer JD
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2013 Apr; 19(4):529-38. PubMed ID: 23428436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimation of detection thresholds for redirected walking techniques.
Steinicke F; Bruder G; Jerald J; Frenz H; Lappe M
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2010; 16(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 19910658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Building virtual reality fMRI paradigms: a framework for presenting immersive virtual environments.
Mueller C; Luehrs M; Baecke S; Adolf D; Luetzkendorf R; Luchtmann M; Bernarding J
J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Aug; 209(2):290-8. PubMed ID: 22759716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of a data management tool for investigating multivariate space and free will experiences in virtual reality.
Morie JF; Iyer K; Luigi DP; Williams J; Dozois A; Rizzo AS
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2005 Sep; 30(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 16167194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CAVE and fishtank virtual-reality displays: a qualitative and quantitative comparison.
Demiralp C; Jackson CD; Karelitz DB; Zhang S; Laidlaw DH
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2006; 12(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 16640246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Kinematic evaluation of virtual walking trajectories.
Cirio G; Olivier AH; Marchal M; Pettré J
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2013 Apr; 19(4):671-80. PubMed ID: 23428452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating display fidelity and interaction fidelity in a virtual reality game.
McMahan RP; Bowman DA; Zielinski DJ; Brady RB
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2012 Apr; 18(4):626-33. PubMed ID: 22402690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Egocentric depth judgments in optical, see-through augmented reality.
Swan JE; Jones A; Kolstad E; Livingston MA; Smallman HS
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2007; 13(3):429-42. PubMed ID: 17356211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of immersion on visual analysis of volume data.
Laha B; Sensharma K; Schiffbauer JD; Bowman DA
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2012 Apr; 18(4):597-606. PubMed ID: 22402687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Geometric calibration of head-mounted displays and its effects on distance estimation.
Kellner F; Bolte B; Bruder G; Rautenberg U; Steinicke F; Lappe M; Koch R
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2012 Apr; 18(4):589-96. PubMed ID: 22402686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Attributes of subtle cues for facilitating visual search in augmented reality.
Lu W; Duh HB; Feiner S; Zhao Q
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2014 Mar; 20(3):404-12. PubMed ID: 24434221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Drumming in immersive virtual reality: the body shapes the way we play.
Kilteni K; Bergstrom I; Slater M
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2013 Apr; 19(4):597-605. PubMed ID: 23428444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Towards Virtual VATS, Face, and Construct Evaluation for Peg Transfer Training of Box, VR, AR, and MR Trainer.
Qin Z; Tai Y; Xia C; Peng J; Huang X; Chen Z; Li Q; Shi J
J Healthc Eng; 2019; 2019():6813719. PubMed ID: 30723539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Naïve realism: folk fallacies in the design and use of visual displays.
Smallman HS; Cook MB
Top Cogn Sci; 2011 Jul; 3(3):579-608. PubMed ID: 25164404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of sound on visual fidelity perception in stereoscopic 3-D.
Rojas D; Kapralos B; Hogue A; Collins K; Nacke L; Cristancho S; Conati C; Dubrowski A
IEEE Trans Cybern; 2013 Dec; 43(6):1572-83. PubMed ID: 24122614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Usability Comparisons of Head-Mounted vs. Stereoscopic Desktop Displays in a Virtual Reality Environment with Pain Patients.
Tong X; Gromala D; Gupta D; Squire P
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 220():424-31. PubMed ID: 27046617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator.
Botden SM; Buzink SN; Schijven MP; Jakimowicz JJ
World J Surg; 2007 Apr; 31(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 17361356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The German VR Simulation Realism Scale--psychometric construction for virtual reality applications with virtual humans.
Poeschl S; Doering N
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 191():33-7. PubMed ID: 23792838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of the evoked potential P3 component for control in a virtual apartment.
Bayliss JD
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Jun; 11(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 12899249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
