These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23428722)

  • 1. [Why is the scientometric gap widening? Deterioration of the scientific parameters of surgical specialties].
    Harsányi L; Weltner J; Zaránd A
    Magy Seb; 2013 Feb; 66(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 23428722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [To the Editors: Comment on Harsányi et al., "Why is the scientometric gap widening? Deterioration of the scientific parameters of surgical specialties in Hungary"].
    Dubecz A
    Magy Seb; 2013 Oct; 66(5):280. PubMed ID: 24344386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [To the Editor-in-Chief: Contribution to the topic discussed by Harsányi et al., "Why is the scientometric gap widening? Deterioration of the scientific parameters of surgical specialties in Hungary"].
    Lázár G
    Magy Seb; 2013 Oct; 66(5):279-80. PubMed ID: 24144823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The impact of a journal. Comment on the report by L.Harsányi et al. "Why is the scientometric gap widening? Deterioration of the scientific parameters of surgical specialties"].
    Kotsis L
    Magy Seb; 2013 Jun; 66(3):178. PubMed ID: 23905229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comment on the report by L.Harsányi et al. "Why is the scientometric gap widening? Deterioration of the scientific parameters of surgical specialties"].
    Horváth OP
    Magy Seb; 2013 Jun; 66(3):177-8. PubMed ID: 23782607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [To the Editors: The impact of surgery journals. Comment on the report by Harsányi et al., "Why is the scientometric gap widening? Deterioration of the scientific parameters of surgical specialties."].
    Gaál C
    Magy Seb; 2013 Aug; 66(4):198. PubMed ID: 24171233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [From the medieval manuscript copiers to the world wide web or how much does distance distort? Reply to the comment of Dr. Csaba Gaál on our article "Why is the scientometric gap widening? Deterioration of the scientific parameters of surgical specialties."].
    Harsányi L; Weltner J; Zaránd A
    Magy Seb; 2013 Aug; 66(4):198-9. PubMed ID: 24171234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [A game without rules: the impact factor system].
    Heindel W; Adam G; Hamm B; Schild HH; Schiller U
    Rofo; 2013 Aug; 185(8):697-8. PubMed ID: 23900939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Research in urologic university clinics. Assessment of current status and perspectives].
    Miller K; Krause H
    Urologe A; 2006 Sep; 45 Suppl 4():15-9. PubMed ID: 16865381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The future of clinical research.
    Vaitukaitis JL
    Clin Res; 1991 Apr; 39(2):145-56. PubMed ID: 2044346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A commentary on misuses of the impact factor.
    Wróblewski AK
    Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2008; 56(6):355-6. PubMed ID: 19043674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality and reporting of trial design in scientific papers in Anaesthesia over 25 years.
    Langford RA; Huang GH; Leslie K
    Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 19032695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The European Heart Journal on the move: can scientific publishing be further improved?
    Lüscher TF; Gersh B; Hindricks G; Landmesser U; Nallamothu B; Ruschitzka F; Wijns W
    Eur Heart J; 2013 Feb; 34(6):409-15. PubMed ID: 23132609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Journal of Pediatric Psychology (JPP), 2003 2007: Editor's Vale Dictum.
    Brown RT
    J Pediatr Psychol; 2007; 32(10):1165-78. PubMed ID: 18073236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Urgent reforms needed to revive impact factor of India's medical journals.
    Agoramoorthy G
    Indian J Med Res; 2008 Apr; 127(4):410-2. PubMed ID: 18577802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Focal points of research].
    Zenner HP
    HNO; 2005 Aug; 53(8):681. PubMed ID: 16021406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Too much reaction and very little action.
    Habal MB
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):697-708. PubMed ID: 23714860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Editorial: an age of enlightenment or information overload?
    Davis TR
    J Hand Surg Br; 2004 Dec; 29(6):521-9. PubMed ID: 15542210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Evaluation of scientific publications and professional life of a scientist].
    Reverter Masià J
    Nutr Hosp; 2012; 27(4):1368-9. PubMed ID: 23165589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scientific publishing: who will pay for open access?
    Butler D
    Nature; 2003 Oct; 425(6958):554-5. PubMed ID: 14534559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.