426 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23429611)
1. Rebound tonometer: ideal tonometer for measurement of accurate intraocular pressure.
Suman S; Agrawal A; Pal VK; Pratap VB
J Glaucoma; 2014 Dec; 23(9):633-7. PubMed ID: 23429611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Icare PRO Rebound Tonometer, Tomey FT-1000 Noncontact Tonometer, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Healthy Subjects.
Güler M; Bilak Ş; Bilgin B; Şimşek A; Çapkin M; Hakim Reyhan A
J Glaucoma; 2015; 24(8):613-8. PubMed ID: 25264986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature radius on the intraocular pressure as measured by different tonometers: noncontact and goldmann applanation tonometers.
Harada Y; Hirose N; Kubota T; Tawara A
J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):619-25. PubMed ID: 19092456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of central corneal thickness on intraocular pressure and comparison of Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Mansoori T; Balakrishna N
Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Mar; 101(2):206-212. PubMed ID: 29044716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Influence of Corneal Biomechanical Properties on Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using a Rebound Self-tonometer.
Brown L; Foulsham W; Pronin S; Tatham AJ
J Glaucoma; 2018 Jun; 27(6):511-518. PubMed ID: 29557828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationship of central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure by iCare rebound tonometer.
Rao A; Kumar M; Prakash B; Varshney G
J Glaucoma; 2014 Aug; 23(6):380-4. PubMed ID: 23221904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements and assessment of intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility with the portable ICare rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.
Salim S; Du H; Wan J
J Glaucoma; 2013; 22(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 23542696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure using Corvis ST and comparison of the Corvis ST, noncontact tonometer, and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.
Nakao Y; Kiuchi Y; Okumichi H
PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238395. PubMed ID: 32966284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group.
Chen M; Zhang L; Xu J; Chen X; Gu Y; Ren Y; Wang K
BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):225. PubMed ID: 31726999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparability of Icare Pro Rebound Tonometer with Goldmann Applanation and Noncontact Tonometer in a Wide Range of Intraocular Pressure and Central Corneal Thickness.
Tamçelik N; Atalay E; Cicik E; Özkök A
Ophthalmic Res; 2015; 54(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 26022193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Three Different Tonometers in Eyes with Angle Closure.
Lee TE; Yoo C; Kim YY
Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Feb; 96(2):124-129. PubMed ID: 30589761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The difference in intraocular pressure readings between 3 applanation tonometers is independent of central corneal thickness, in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes.
Baily C; Dooley I; Collins N; Hickey-Dwyer M
J Glaucoma; 2014 Dec; 23(9):620-3. PubMed ID: 23429625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new tonometer--the Corvis ST tonometer: clinical comparison with noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers.
Hong J; Xu J; Wei A; Deng SX; Cui X; Yu X; Sun X
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 54(1):659-65. PubMed ID: 23307970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of a New Rebound Self-tonometer, Icare HOME: Comparison With Goldmann Applanation Tonometer.
Takagi D; Sawada A; Yamamoto T
J Glaucoma; 2017 Jul; 26(7):613-618. PubMed ID: 28369004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare
Valero B; Fénolland JR; Rosenberg R; Sendon D; Mesnard C; Sigaux M; Giraud JM; Renard JP
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec; 40(10):865-875. PubMed ID: 29174296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repeatability and accuracy of applanation resonance tonometry in healthy subjects and patients with glaucoma.
Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Brusini P
Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Feb; 92(1):e66-73. PubMed ID: 23837834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of intraocular pressure values obtained using a Goldmann applanation tonometer and a handheld version of applanation resonance tonometer: A preliminary report.
Mulak M; Czak WA; Mimier M; Kaczmarek R
Adv Clin Exp Med; 2018 Apr; 27(4):481-485. PubMed ID: 29558028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature on the intraocular pressure measurement by Goldmann applanation tonometer and ocular blood flow pneumatonometer.
Saleh TA; Adams M; McDermott B; Claridge KG; Ewings P
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 34(6):516-20. PubMed ID: 16925697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing applanation tonometry and rebound tonometry in glaucomatous and ocular hypertensive eyes.
Marini M; Da Pozzo S; Accardo A; Canziani T
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 20890884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.
Brusini P; Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Parisi L
J Glaucoma; 2006 Jun; 15(3):213-7. PubMed ID: 16778643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
