264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23429677)
1. Motion path of the instant center of rotation in the cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension: implications for artificial disc design and evaluation of motion quality after arthrodesis.
Anderst W; Baillargeon E; Donaldson W; Lee J; Kang J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(10):E594-601. PubMed ID: 23429677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Six-degrees-of-freedom cervical spine range of motion during dynamic flexion-extension after single-level anterior arthrodesis: comparison with asymptomatic control subjects.
Anderst WJ; Lee JY; Donaldson WF; Kang JD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Mar; 95(6):497-506. PubMed ID: 23515984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Longitudinal Study of the Six Degrees of Freedom Cervical Spine Range of Motion During Dynamic Flexion, Extension, and Rotation After Single-level Anterior Arthrodesis.
Anderst WJ; West T; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Nov; 41(22):E1319-E1327. PubMed ID: 27831986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical motion segment percent contributions to flexion-extension during continuous functional movement in control subjects and arthrodesis patients.
Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Apr; 38(9):E533-9. PubMed ID: 23370681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Continuous cervical spine kinematics during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.
Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
Spine J; 2014 Jul; 14(7):1221-7. PubMed ID: 24210579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity, reliability and accuracy of the instant center of rotation calculation in the cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.
Baillargeon E; Anderst WJ
J Biomech; 2013 Feb; 46(4):670-6. PubMed ID: 23317757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vivo cervical facet joint capsule deformation during flexion-extension.
Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Apr; 39(8):E514-20. PubMed ID: 24480943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Locating the Instant Center of Rotation in the Subaxial Cervical Spine with Biplanar Fluoroscopy during
Kim SH; Ham DW; Lee JI; Park SW; Ko MJ; Koo SB; Song KS
Clin Orthop Surg; 2019 Dec; 11(4):482-489. PubMed ID: 31788173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Motion response of a polycrystalline diamond adaptive axis of rotation cervical total disc arthroplasty.
Havey RM; Khayatzadeh S; Voronov LI; Blank KR; Carandang G; Harding DP; Patwardhan AG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Feb; 62():34-41. PubMed ID: 30665037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
Sasso RC; Best NM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dimensional changes of the neuroforamina in subaxial cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.
Mao H; Driscoll SJ; Li JS; Li G; Wood KB; Cha TD
Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4):540-6. PubMed ID: 26681352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional intervertebral kinematics in the healthy young adult cervical spine during dynamic functional loading.
Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
J Biomech; 2015 May; 48(7):1286-93. PubMed ID: 25814180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic foraminal dimensions during neck extension and rotation in fusion and artificial disc replacement: an observational study.
Yeni YN; Baumer T; Oravec D; Basheer A; McDonald CP; Bey MJ; Bartol SW; Chang V
Spine J; 2018 Apr; 18(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 28882520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intervertebral kinematics of the cervical spine before, during, and after high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation.
Anderst WJ; Gale T; LeVasseur C; Raj S; Gongaware K; Schneider M
Spine J; 2018 Dec; 18(12):2333-2342. PubMed ID: 30142458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of pathology and one-level versus two-level arthrodesis on cervical spine intervertebral helical axis of motion.
LeVasseur CM; Pitcairn SW; Shaw JD; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Anderst WJ
J Biomech; 2022 Mar; 133():110960. PubMed ID: 35074698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In Vivo Changes in Dynamic Adjacent Segment Motion 1 Year After One and Two-Level Cervical Arthrodesis.
LeVasseur CM; Pitcairn SW; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS; Shaw JD; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Anderst WJ
Ann Biomed Eng; 2022 Jul; 50(7):871-881. PubMed ID: 35397715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical disc deformation during flexion-extension in asymptomatic controls and single-level arthrodesis patients.
Anderst W; Donaldson W; Lee J; Kang J
J Orthop Res; 2013 Dec; 31(12):1881-9. PubMed ID: 23861160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adjacent-level range of motion and intradiscal pressure after posterior cervical decompression and fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Kretzer RM; Hsu W; Hu N; Umekoji H; Jallo GI; McAfee PC; Tortolani PJ; Cunningham BW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):E778-85. PubMed ID: 22228326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In Vivo Evidence of Early Instability and Late Stabilization in Motion Segments Immediately Superior to Anterior Cervical Arthrodesis.
Chen SR; LeVasseur CM; Pitcairn S; Munsch MA; Couch BK; Kanter AS; Okonkwo DO; Shaw JD; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Anderst WJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Sep; 47(17):1234-1240. PubMed ID: 35794796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
