264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23429677)
21. Influence of cervical total disc replacement on motion in the target and adjacent segments.
Vogt M; Mehren C; Hackenbroch C; Wilke HJ
Spine J; 2024 Jul; 24(7):1313-1322. PubMed ID: 38301903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of hybrid constructs with 2-level artificial disc replacement and 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for surgical reconstruction of the cervical spine: a kinematic study in whole cadavers.
Liu B; Zeng Z; Hoof TV; Kalala JP; Liu Z; Wu B
Med Sci Monit; 2015 Apr; 21():1031-7. PubMed ID: 25853772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Study of Cobb Angular Velocity in Cervical Spine during Dynamic Extension-Flexion.
Ren D; Hu Z; Yuan W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41(7):E410-5. PubMed ID: 26583468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effect of cervical intervertebral disc degeneration on the motion path of instantaneous center of rotation at degenerated and adjacent segments: A finite element analysis.
Sang D; Du CF; Wu B; Cai XY; Cui W; Yuchi CX; Rong T; Sang H; Liu B
Comput Biol Med; 2021 Jul; 134():104426. PubMed ID: 33979732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.
Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Motion changes in adjacent segments due to moderate and severe degeneration in C5-C6 disc: a poroelastic C3-T1 finite element model study.
Hussain M; Natarajan RN; An HS; Andersson GB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(9):939-47. PubMed ID: 20375779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The move-C cervical artificial disc can restore intact range of motion and 3-D kinematics.
Vogt M; Zengerle L; Jonas R; Wilke HJ
Spine J; 2024 Feb; 24(2):340-351. PubMed ID: 37660895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. In vivo 3D kinematic changes in the cervical spine after laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Nagamoto Y; Iwasaki M; Sugiura T; Fujimori T; Matsuo Y; Kashii M; Sakaura H; Ishii T; Murase T; Yoshikawa H; Sugamoto K
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):417-24. PubMed ID: 24926932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison between sheep and human cervical spines: an anatomic, radiographic, bone mineral density, and biomechanical study.
Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Scholz M; Schnake K; Lucke M; Schröder R; Mittlmeier T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 May; 26(9):1028-37. PubMed ID: 11337621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Three-dimensional motion analysis of the cervical spine for comparison of anterior cervical decompression and fusion versus artificial disc replacement in 17 patients: clinical article.
McDonald CP; Chang V; McDonald M; Ramo N; Bey MJ; Bartol S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Mar; 20(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 24359000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Total Disk Replacement Adjacent to a Multilevel Fusion in the Cervical Spine: A Biomechanical Motion Analysis.
Segal DN; Grabel ZJ; Wilson JM; Milby AH; Shi WJ; Hutton WC; Rhee JM
World Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 122():e881-e889. PubMed ID: 30391767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparative Study Between M6-C and Mobi-C Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement: Biomechanical Outcomes and Comparison with Normative Data.
Pham M; Phan K; Teng I; Mobbs RJ
Orthop Surg; 2018 May; 10(2):84-88. PubMed ID: 29878713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Artificial disc replacement combined with fusion versus two-level fusion in cervical two-level disc disease.
Shin DA; Yi S; Yoon DH; Kim KN; Shin HC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(11):1153-9; discussion 1160-1. PubMed ID: 19444062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Biomechanical evaluation of adjacent segment degeneration after one- or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty: A finite element analysis.
Hua W; Zhi J; Wang B; Ke W; Sun W; Yang S; Li L; Yang C
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Jun; 189():105352. PubMed ID: 31991316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Kinematics of cervical segments C5/C6 in axial rotation before and after total disc arthroplasty.
Wachowski MM; Weiland J; Wagner M; Gezzi R; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Nägerl H
Eur Spine J; 2017 Sep; 26(9):2425-2433. PubMed ID: 28378073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation for multilevel cervical arthrodesis: an in vitro human cadaveric study of the operative and adjacent segment kinematics.
Dmitriev AE; Kuklo TR; Lehman RA; Rosner MK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):E188-96. PubMed ID: 17413459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Disc replacement adjacent to cervical fusion: a biomechanical comparison of hybrid construct versus two-level fusion.
Lee MJ; Dumonski M; Phillips FM; Voronov LI; Renner SM; Carandang G; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Nov; 36(23):1932-9. PubMed ID: 21289581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessing
Tan CH; Patwardhan A; Thani N
J Spine Surg; 2023 Mar; 9(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 37038416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. In vivo analysis of cervical kinematics after implantation of a minimally constrained cervical artificial disc replacement.
Koller H; Meier O; Zenner J; Mayer M; Hitzl W
Eur Spine J; 2013 Apr; 22(4):747-58. PubMed ID: 23179982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
