57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2343087)
1. [Diagnosis of the aortocoronary bypass--a comparison of MRT and CT].
Sandring KH; Lüning M; Förster A; Müller C
Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1990; 31(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 2343087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The value of CT and MRT in assessing aortocoronary venous bypasses in comparison with coronary angiography].
Wicke K; Mühlberger V; Judmaier W; Moes N; zur Nedden D
Rofo; 1991 Mar; 154(3):306-9. PubMed ID: 1849300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of coronary artery bypass graft patency as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.
Jenkins JP; Love HG; Foster CJ; Isherwood I; Rowlands DJ
Br J Radiol; 1988 Jan; 61(721):2-4. PubMed ID: 3258170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Evaluating the function of aortocoronary bypasses with magnetic resonance tomography].
Strametz JR; Mayr H; Imhof H; Glogar D
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1991; 103(17):536-8. PubMed ID: 1949814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Noninvasive assessment of aortocoronary bypass using magnetic resonance tomography].
Theissen P; Sechtem U; Langkamp S; Jungehülsing M; Hilger HH; Schicha H
Nuklearmedizin; 1989 Dec; 28(6):234-42. PubMed ID: 2608447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The value of spiral computed tomography in the imaging of aortocoronary bypass vessels].
Steiner P; Phillips F; Stiel G; Schuchert A; Rust C; Hauger B; Bücheler E
Rofo; 1994 Jan; 160(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 8305687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Multi-slice CT of aortocoronary venous bypasses and mammary artery bypasses: evaluation of bypasses and their anastomoses].
Fröhner S; Wagner M; Schmitt R; Brunn J; Müller M; Christopoulos G; Coblenz G; Kerber S; Urbanski P
Rontgenpraxis; 2002; 54(5):163-73. PubMed ID: 12051077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparison between angiographic and computed tomographic imaging of aortocoronary bypasses in 100 patients].
Mühlberger V; Knapp E; zur Nedden D; Braunsteiner H
Rofo; 1985 Apr; 142(4):406-10. PubMed ID: 2986217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [The value of nuclear magnetic resonance tomography in evaluating the patency of aortocoronary bypass grafts].
Knoll P; Bonatti G; Pitscheider W; Psenner K; Erlicher A; Zammarchi A; Crepaz R
Z Kardiol; 1994 Jun; 83(6):439-45. PubMed ID: 8067046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cine computed tomographic evaluation of aortocoronary bypass graft patency.
Bateman TM; Gray RJ; Whiting JS; Matloff JM; Berman DS; Forrester JS
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1986 Sep; 8(3):693-8. PubMed ID: 3489022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Results of computed tomographic control of the course of aortocoronary bypass patency].
Schulz HG; Neugebauer A; Lasek G; Trenckmann H; Emmrich K
Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1985; 26(3):367-73. PubMed ID: 3875118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting of the left internal thoracic artery by means of magnetic resonance imaging.
Stauder NI; Fenchel M; Stauder H; Küttner A; Scheule AM; Kramer U; Claussen CD; Miller S
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Mar; 129(3):607-14. PubMed ID: 15746745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Capacities of multidetector spiral computed tomography in the planning and postoperative examination of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery].
Nikonova ME; Fedotenkov IS; Shiriaev AA; Akchurin RS
Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2012; (1):28-33. PubMed ID: 22679811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Imaging of aortocoronary bypasses with intravenous digital subtraction angiography].
Sievert H; Rauber K; Kunkel B; Schork A; Satter P; Riemann H; Kaltenbach M; Kober G
Z Kardiol; 1987 Dec; 76(12):733-6. PubMed ID: 3326312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Non-selective digital subtraction angiography of aortocoronary bypasses].
Harder T; Steudel A; Mohr F; Schüller J
Rofo; 1991 Jan; 154(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 1846686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Magnetic resonance with the spin-echo technic in the noninvasive evaluation of the patency of aortocoronary bypasses: preliminary data].
Knoll P; Bonatti G; Pitscheider W; Psenner K; Erlicher A; Crepaz R; Zammarchi A; Gostner P; Braito E
G Ital Cardiol; 1993 Mar; 23(3):239-46. PubMed ID: 8325459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Control of the patency of coronary artery bypasses with contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography].
Brenner P; Wintersperger BJ; Agirov V; Kreuzer E; Reiser M; Reichart B
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1998; 115():1308-11. PubMed ID: 9931867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computed tomography angiography of coronary artery bypass grafts: robustness in emergency and clinical routine settings.
Heye T; Kauczor HU; Szabo G; Hosch W
Acta Radiol; 2014 Mar; 55(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 23908242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Cystic lesion in the topography of occluded aortocoronary saphenous vein bypass].
Krupiński M; Urbańczyk-Zawadzka M; Banyś RP; Irzyk M; Laskowicz B; Urbanik A
Przegl Lek; 2013; 70(5):351-2. PubMed ID: 23944109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multislice CT evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patients.
Gilkeson RC; Markowitz AH
J Thorac Imaging; 2007 Feb; 22(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 17325577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
