151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23431234)
1. Breast density legislation.
Hall FM
Radiology; 2013 Mar; 266(3):997-8. PubMed ID: 23431234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Response.
Lee CI; Bassett LW; Lehman CD
Radiology; 2013 Mar; 266(3):999-1000. PubMed ID: 23550288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Response.
Hooley RJ; Greenberg K; Stackhouse RM; Geisel J; Butler R; Philpotts LE
Radiology; 2013 Mar; 266(3):998-9. PubMed ID: 23550287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast density legislation and opportunities for patient-centered outcomes research.
Lee CI; Bassett LW; Lehman CD
Radiology; 2012 Sep; 264(3):632-6. PubMed ID: 22919037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast Density Legislation: More Evidence is Needed.
Whitman GJ; Woodtichartpreecha P
Breast J; 2016 Sep; 22(5):491-2. PubMed ID: 27571966
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Density and breast cancer risk.
Harvey JA; Yaffe MJ; D'Orsi C; Sickles EA
Radiology; 2013 May; 267(2):657-8. PubMed ID: 23610099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast cancer survival in MR imaging-enabled screening.
Levman JE
Radiology; 2013 Jun; 267(3):967-8. PubMed ID: 23704295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Response.
D'Orsi C; Sickles EA
Radiology; 2013 May; 267(2):658-9. PubMed ID: 23741743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Response.
D'Orsi C; Sickles EA
Radiology; 2013 Jun; 267(3):968. PubMed ID: 23844423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. To seek perfection or not? That is the question.
D'Orsi CJ; Sickles EA
Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 22929336
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Dense breasts: a review of reporting legislation and available supplemental screening options.
Ho JM; Jafferjee N; Covarrubias GM; Ghesani M; Handler B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Aug; 203(2):449-56. PubMed ID: 25055284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measuring the Effect of Breast Density Legislation on a State's Patients.
Radiol Technol; 2016 Nov; 88(2):189CT-192CT. PubMed ID: 27837145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Experience with a quality control system for mammography in a private practice setting].
Krohn BR
Radiologe; 2003 Apr; 43(4):306-9. PubMed ID: 12721647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE
Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Divide Between Breast Density Notification Laws and Evidence-Based Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening: Legislating Practice.
Haas JS; Kaplan CP
JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Sep; 175(9):1439-40. PubMed ID: 26147642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant mammary lesions with special regard to the BI-RADS((R)) classification system in mammography].
Boehm T; Garzoli E; Marincek B
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2002; 42(4):191-200. PubMed ID: 12373023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast imaging in general practice.
Houssami N; Brennan M; French J; Fitzgerald P
Aust Fam Physician; 2005 Jun; 34(6):467-73. PubMed ID: 15931406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance imaging and breast ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammographic screening in high-risk patients.
Le-Petross HT; Shetty MK
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2011 Aug; 32(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 21782116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer due to mammography screening.
Zahl PH
Ann Intern Med; 2012 Aug; 157(3):220-1; author reply 221-2. PubMed ID: 22868851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer due to mammography screening.
Haldorsen T; Tretli S; Ursin G
Ann Intern Med; 2012 Aug; 157(3):220; author reply 221-2. PubMed ID: 22868850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
