These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23431845)

  • 1. Ethics committees in New Zealand.
    Gillett G; Douglass A
    J Law Med; 2012 Dec; 20(2):266-72. PubMed ID: 23431845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An unfortunate experiment? The future of ethical review in New Zealand.
    McMillan J; Bowyer L
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2014 Jul; 23(3):268-71. PubMed ID: 24866915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Translating ethics into law: duties of care in health research involving humans.
    Zimmerman SV
    Health Law Rev; 2005; 13(2-3):13-8. PubMed ID: 16459410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. NZ medicine after Cartwright.
    Gillett G
    BMJ; 1990 Apr; 300(6729):892-4. PubMed ID: 11642768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A welcome guide for evaluating medical research involving human subjects].
    Borst-Eilers E
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 May; 147(19):898-900. PubMed ID: 12768802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recurrent issues in the review of medical research on human subjects.
    Moore DL
    Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1991; 1():1-33. PubMed ID: 16296123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two models of ethics committees.
    Clarke S
    J Bioeth Inq; 2005; 2(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 16025620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human research ethics committees: examining their roles and practices.
    Guillemin M; Gillam L; Rosenthal D; Bolitho A
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2012 Jul; 7(3):38-49. PubMed ID: 22850142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The long arm of administrative law: applying administrative law principles to research ethics boards.
    Hadskis M; Carver P
    Health Law Rev; 2005; 13(2-3):19-32. PubMed ID: 16459411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. University's Multiple Project Assurance (MPA) could be renewed for only short periods of time.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jul; 15(7):5-6. PubMed ID: 12199226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Research oversight through new lenses: the consortium to examine clinical research ethics.
    Sugarman J; Eckenwiler LA; Emanuel EJ
    IRB; 2003; 25(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 12833899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Introduction to special issue of Accountability in Research on the review and approval of biomedical research proposals: a call for a centralized national human research protections system.
    Mann H; Shamoo AE
    Account Res; 2006; 13(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 16770856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ethical oversight of research in developing countries.
    Kass N; Dawson L; Loyo-Berrios NI
    IRB; 2003; 25(2):1-10. PubMed ID: 12833901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unequal protection for patient rights: the divide between university and health ethics committees.
    Tolich M; Baldwin KM
    J Bioeth Inq; 2005; 2(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 16025617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ethics committees in the United States.
    Capron AM
    Not Polit; 2002; 18(67):87-94. PubMed ID: 15282924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auckland hospital ethical committee: the first three years.
    Richmond DE
    N Z Med J; 1977 Jul; 86(591):10-2. PubMed ID: 271855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SACHRP recommendations for review of children's research requiring DHHS secretary's approval.
    Fisher CB; Kornetsky SZ
    IRB; 2005; 27(3):8-10. PubMed ID: 16021795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New Zealand's ethics committees.
    Moore A
    N Z Bioeth J; 2004 Jun; 5(2):3. PubMed ID: 15597495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ethical issues: the multi-centre low-risk ethics/governance review process and AMOSS.
    Vaughan G; Pollock W; Peek MJ; Knight M; Ellwood D; Homer CS; Pulver LJ; McLintock C; Ho MT; Sullivan EA
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Apr; 52(2):195-203. PubMed ID: 22188386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The conduct of Canadian researchers and institutional review boards regarding substituted consent for research.
    Bravo G; Dubois MF; Paquet M
    IRB; 2004; 26(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 15281211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.