These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23431859)

  • 1. When is the sterilisation of an intellectually disabled child "therapeutic"? A practical analysis of the legal requirement to seek court authorisation.
    Naik L
    J Law Med; 2012 Dec; 20(2):453-63. PubMed ID: 23431859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The family v. the family court: sterilisation issues.
    Petersen K
    Aust J Public Health; 1992 Jun; 16(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 1391164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. "Forced sterilisation": clarifying and challenging intuitions and models.
    Parker M
    J Law Med; 2013 Mar; 20(3):512-27. PubMed ID: 23600186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treatment for gender dysphoria in children: the new legal, ethical and clinical landscape.
    Smith MK; Mathews B
    Med J Aust; 2015 Feb; 202(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 25627744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The right to procreate: intellectual disability and the law.
    Mair ML
    Aust Coll Midwives Inc J; 1992 Dec; 5(4):16-20. PubMed ID: 1290418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Medically necessary sterilization of a minor with intellectual disability: a case report and historical perspective.
    Sowa NA; Rosenstein DL
    N C Med J; 2015; 76(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 25621486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Australian children living with gender dysphoria: does the Family Court have a role to play?
    Kelly F
    J Law Med; 2014 Sep; 22(1):105-20. PubMed ID: 25341322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sterilization and medical treatment of the mentally disabled: some legal and ethical reflections.
    Rivet M
    Med Law; 1990; 9(5):1150-71. PubMed ID: 2126840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sterilisation of intellectually disabled minors.
    Freckelton I
    J Law Med; 2007 Feb; 14(3):299-305. PubMed ID: 17355093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In re Jane, 22 December 1988.
    Australia. Family Court
    Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():21-2. PubMed ID: 12289416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sterilisation of the intellectually disabled: the need for legislative reform.
    Blackwood J
    Aust J Fam Law; 1991 Aug; 5(2):138-70. PubMed ID: 16086479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative approaches to the nonconsensual sterilization of the mentally retarded.
    Price DP
    Med Law; 1990; 9(3):940-9. PubMed ID: 2122162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attorney-General (QLD) v. Parents, In re S.
    Australia. Family Court
    Fed Law Rep; 1989 Nov; 98():41-56. PubMed ID: 12041104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Re Jane.
    Australia. Family Court
    Fed Law Rep; 1988 Dec; 94():1-31. PubMed ID: 12041105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Non-consensual sterilization of the adult with learning disabilities.
    Knifton C
    Br J Nurs; 1998 Oct 22-Nov 11; 7(19):1172-6. PubMed ID: 9866467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The legal situation concerning the sterilization of mentally handicapped persons].
    Braun M; Miess D; Sibinger J; Engelmann U
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2003 Jun; 128(25-26):1412-4. PubMed ID: 12813677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Managing ethically questionable parental requests: growth suppression and manipulation of puberty.
    Isaacs D; Tobin B; Hamblin J; Slaytor E; Donaghue KC; Munns C; Kilham HA
    J Paediatr Child Health; 2011 Sep; 47(9):581-4. PubMed ID: 21951436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revisiting the legal standards that govern requests to sterilize profoundly incompetent children: in light of the "Ashley Treatment," is a new standard appropriate?
    Ryan C
    Fordham Law Rev; 2008 Oct; 77(1):287-326. PubMed ID: 18985934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Re Elizabeth (Ross, Jones J.).
    Australia. Family Court
    Fed Law Rep; 1989; 96():248-67. PubMed ID: 17001809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hobson's choice: reproductive choices for women with learning disabilities.
    Keywood K
    Med Law; 1998; 17(2):149-65. PubMed ID: 9757730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.