These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23432403)

  • 1. A prospective observational study on 249 subcutaneous central vein access ports in a Swedish county hospital.
    Taxbro K; Berg S; Hammarskjöld F; Hanberger H; Malmvall BE
    Acta Oncol; 2013 Jun; 52(5):893-901. PubMed ID: 23432403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk of thrombosis and infections of central venous catheters and totally implanted access ports in patients treated for cancer.
    Beckers MM; Ruven HJ; Seldenrijk CA; Prins MH; Biesma DH
    Thromb Res; 2010 Apr; 125(4):318-21. PubMed ID: 19640573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Morbidity after insertion of totally implantable venous access ports in oncological patients: results of a retrospective clinical study.
    Aspalter M; Lechner M; Linni K; Hitzl W; Hölzenbein T; Ofner D; Emmanuel K
    Am Surg; 2014 Feb; 80(2):204-7. PubMed ID: 24480224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Polyurethane versus silicone catheters for central venous port devices implanted at the forearm.
    Wildgruber M; Lueg C; Borgmeyer S; Karimov I; Braun U; Kiechle M; Meier R; Koehler M; Ettl J; Berger H
    Eur J Cancer; 2016 May; 59():113-124. PubMed ID: 27023050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiologic placement of a low profile implantable venous access port in a pediatric population.
    Nosher JL; Bodner LJ; Ettinger LJ; Siegel RL; Gribbin C; Asch J; Drachtman RA
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(6):395-9. PubMed ID: 11907746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The late complications of totally implantable central venous access ports: the results from an Italian multicenter prospective observation study.
    Dal Molin A; Rasero L; Guerretta L; Perfetti E; Clerico M
    Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2011 Dec; 15(5):377-81. PubMed ID: 21167777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incidence of mechanical malfunction in low-profile subcutaneous implantable venous access devices in patients receiving chemotherapy for gynecologic malignancies.
    Subramaniam A; Kim KH; Bryant SA; Kimball KJ; Huh WK; Straughn JM; Estes JM; Alvarez RD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Oct; 123(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 21742372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiologic placement of subcutaneous infusion chest ports for long-term central venous access.
    Funaki B; Szymski GX; Hackworth CA; Rosenblum JD; Burke R; Chang T; Leef JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Nov; 169(5):1431-4. PubMed ID: 9353475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Insertion and management of long-term central venous devices: role of radiologic imaging techniques].
    Capaccioli L; Nistri M; Distante V; Rontini M; Manetti A; Stecco A
    Radiol Med; 1998 Oct; 96(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9972217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Follow-up of radiologically totally implanted central venous access ports of the upper arm: long-term complications in 127,750 catheter-days.
    Busch JD; Herrmann J; Heller F; Derlin T; Koops A; Adam G; Habermann CR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):447-52. PubMed ID: 22826411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Placement and management of long-term central venous access catheters and ports.
    Denny DF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Aug; 161(2):385-93. PubMed ID: 8333382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Totally implantable femoral vein catheters in cancer patients.
    Wolosker N; Yazbek G; Munia MA; Zerati AE; Langer M; Nishinari K
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Sep; 30(7):771-5. PubMed ID: 15296992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Totally implantable venous access ports: retrospective review of long-term complications in 81 patients.
    Bassi KK; Giri AK; Pattanayak M; Abraham SW; Pandey KK
    Indian J Cancer; 2012; 49(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 22842178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term results of radiologic placement of a central vein access device.
    Beheshti MV; Protzer WR; Tomlinson TL; Martinek E; Baatz LA; Collins MS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Mar; 170(3):731-4. PubMed ID: 9490964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Analysis of the survival of permanent vascular access ports].
    Rodríguez JA; Ferrer E; Olmos A; Codina S; Borrellas J; Piera L
    Nefrologia; 2001; 21(3):260-73. PubMed ID: 11471307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subcutaneously implanted central venous access devices in cancer patients: a prospective analysis.
    Schwarz RE; Groeger JS; Coit DG
    Cancer; 1997 Apr; 79(8):1635-40. PubMed ID: 9118051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Technical benefits and outcomes of modified upwardly created subcutaneous chest pockets for placing central venous ports: single-center experience.
    Lee SH; Chun HJ; Choi BG
    Acta Radiol; 2009 May; 50(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19267272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Subcutaneous chamber systems (ports) for long-term care in cancer patients].
    Hájek R; Sevcík P; Ondrásek J; Mayer J; Vásová I; Král Z; Tomíska M; Krahulcová E; Penka M; Kubesová H
    Vnitr Lek; 1995 Jan; 41(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 7716888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peripherally inserted central venous catheters. Low-risk alternatives for ongoing venous access.
    Merrell SW; Peatross BG; Grossman MD; Sullivan JJ; Harker WG
    West J Med; 1994 Jan; 160(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 8128698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do central venous catheters have advantages over arteriovenous fistulas or grafts?
    Quarello F; Forneris G; Borca M; Pozzato M
    J Nephrol; 2006; 19(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 16874685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.