These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23432659)

  • 1. Using reinforcement learning to examine dynamic attention allocation during reading.
    Liu Y; Reichle ED; Gao DG
    Cogn Sci; 2013; 37(8):1507-40. PubMed ID: 23432659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using reinforcement learning to understand the emergence of "intelligent" eye-movement behavior during reading.
    Reichle ED; Laurent PA
    Psychol Rev; 2006 Apr; 113(2):390-408. PubMed ID: 16637766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Eye movements and parafoveal preview of compound words: does morpheme order matter?
    Angele B; Rayner K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):505-26. PubMed ID: 22712548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading.
    Rayner K; Juhasz BJ; Brown SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):230-45. PubMed ID: 17311490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using E-Z reader to examine word skipping during reading.
    Reichle ED; Drieghe D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1311-20. PubMed ID: 23206168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An Analysis of the Time Course of Lexical Processing During Reading.
    Sheridan H; Reichle ED
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Apr; 40(3):522-53. PubMed ID: 25939443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading.
    Reichle ED; Warren T; McConnell K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 19145006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using eye movements to understand the leakage of information during Chinese reading.
    Liu Y; Reichle ED
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2323-2329. PubMed ID: 29696594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing an assumption of the E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control during reading: using event-related potentials to examine the familiarity check.
    Reichle ED; Tokowicz N; Liu Y; Perfetti CA
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Jul; 48(7):993-1003. PubMed ID: 21261631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading.
    Yan M; Kliegl R; Shu H; Pan J; Zhou X
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1669-76. PubMed ID: 20731511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inhibitory neighbor priming effects in eye movements during reading.
    Paterson KB; Liversedge SP; Davis CJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 19145008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Task effects on eye movements during reading.
    Kaakinen JK; Hyönä J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 20854008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal overlap in the linguistic processing of successive words in reading: reply to Pollatsek, Reichle, and Rayner (2006a).
    Inhoff AW; Radach R; Eiter B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1490-5. PubMed ID: 17154788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Non-canonical reading: reply to Rayner, Pollatsek, Liversedge and Reichle (2008).
    Kennedy A; Pynte J
    Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(14):1916-8. PubMed ID: 19154753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Skipped words and fixated words are processed differently during reading.
    Eskenazi MA; Folk JR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Apr; 22(2):537-42. PubMed ID: 24972648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The time course of word frequency and case alternation effects on fixation times in reading: evidence for lexical control of eye movements.
    Reingold EM; Yang J; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1677-83. PubMed ID: 20731513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using E-Z Reader to examine the concurrent development of eye-movement control and reading skill.
    Reichle ED; Liversedge SP; Drieghe D; Blythe HI; Joseph HS; White SJ; Rayner K
    Dev Rev; 2013 Jun; 33(2):110-149. PubMed ID: 24058229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using E-Z Reader to examine the consequences of fixation-location measurement error.
    Reichle ED; Drieghe D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jan; 41(1):262-70. PubMed ID: 24933699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Understanding the visual constraints on lexical processing: New empirical and simulation results.
    Veldre A; Reichle ED; Yu L; Andrews S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Mar; 152(3):693-722. PubMed ID: 36107696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.