627 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23432666)
1. A randomized controlled clinical multicenter trial comparing the clinical and histological performance of a new, modified polylactide-co-glycolide acid membrane to an expanded polytetrafluorethylene membrane in guided bone regeneration procedures.
Schneider D; Weber FE; Grunder U; Andreoni C; Burkhardt R; Jung RE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 23432666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Guided bone regeneration around endosseous implants with anorganic bovine bone mineral. A randomized controlled trial comparing bioabsorbable versus non-resorbable barriers.
Carpio L; Loza J; Lynch S; Genco R
J Periodontol; 2000 Nov; 71(11):1743-9. PubMed ID: 11128923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Expanded vs. dense polytetrafluoroethylene membranes in vertical ridge augmentation around dental implants: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.
Ronda M; Rebaudi A; Torelli L; Stacchi C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jul; 25(7):859-66. PubMed ID: 23560678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of rhBMP-2 around endosseous implants with and without membranes in the canine model.
Jones AA; Buser D; Schenk R; Wozney J; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2006 Jul; 77(7):1184-93. PubMed ID: 16805681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Bioresorbable barrier membranes for guided bone regeneration around dental implants].
Kohal RJ; Hürzeler MB
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2002; 112(12):1222-9. PubMed ID: 12585214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of regenerated buccal bone 5 years after simultaneous implant placement and guided bone regeneration procedures--a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
Jung RE; Benic GI; Scherrer D; Hämmerle CH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 24299007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non-resorbable membranes after 12-14 years.
Jung RE; Fenner N; Hämmerle CH; Zitzmann NU
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1065-73. PubMed ID: 22697628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical outcomes of GBR procedures to correct peri-implant dehiscences and fenestrations: a systematic review.
Chiapasco M; Zaniboni M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 4():113-23. PubMed ID: 19663958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Histological and clinical comparisons of guided tissue regeneration on dehisced hydroxylapatite-coated and titanium endosseous implant surfaces: a pilot study.
Zablotsky M; Meffert R; Caudill R; Evans G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(3):294-303. PubMed ID: 1667524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of allogeneic, freeze-dried, demineralized bone matrix on guided bone regeneration in supra-alveolar peri-implant defects in dogs.
Caplanis N; Sigurdsson TJ; Rohrer MD; Wikesjö UM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(5):634-42. PubMed ID: 9337024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Healing of dehiscence-type defects in implants placed together with different barrier membranes: a comparative clinical study.
Moses O; Pitaru S; Artzi Z; Nemcovsky CE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Apr; 16(2):210-9. PubMed ID: 15777331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. II. Histologic analysis.
Stentz WC; Mealey BL; Gunsolley JC; Waldrop TC
J Periodontol; 1997 Oct; 68(10):933-49. PubMed ID: 9358360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading.
Urban IA; Jovanovic SA; Lozada JL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):502-10. PubMed ID: 19587874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of a new cross-linked collagen membrane for the treatment of peri-implant dehiscence defects: a randomised controlled double-blinded clinical trial.
Annen BM; Ramel CF; Hämmerle CH; Jung RE
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2011; 4(2):87-100. PubMed ID: 21808759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Early loading of implants in vertically augmented bone with non-resorbable membranes and deproteinised anorganic bovine bone. An uncontrolled prospective cohort study.
Todisco M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2010; 3(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 20467598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing small buccal dehiscence defects around dental implants treated with guided bone regeneration or left for spontaneous healing.
Jung RE; Herzog M; Wolleb K; Ramel CF; Thoma DS; Hämmerle CH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Mar; 28(3):348-354. PubMed ID: 26923088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of guided bone regeneration and grafting on implants placed into immediate extraction sockets. An experimental study in dogs.
Kohal RJ; Mellas P; Hürzeler MB; Trejo PM; Morrison E; Caffesse RG
J Periodontol; 1998 Aug; 69(8):927-37. PubMed ID: 9736376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate a new membrane for guided bone regeneration around dental implants.
Jung RE; Hälg GA; Thoma DS; Hämmerle CH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 19191793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment of peri-implant defects with guided bone regeneration: a comparative clinical study with various membranes and bone grafts.
Lorenzoni M; Pertl C; Keil C; Wegscheider WA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(5):639-46. PubMed ID: 9796147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Immunohistochemical characterization of guided bone regeneration at a dehiscence-type defect using different barrier membranes: an experimental study in dogs.
Schwarz F; Rothamel D; Herten M; Wüstefeld M; Sager M; Ferrari D; Becker J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Apr; 19(4):402-15. PubMed ID: 18324961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
