These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23433101)

  • 1. Everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in heart transplantation: a randomized, multicenter trial.
    Eisen HJ; Kobashigawa J; Starling RC; Pauly DF; Kfoury A; Ross H; Wang SS; Cantin B; Van Bakel A; Ewald G; Hirt S; Lehmkuhl H; Keogh A; Rinaldi M; Potena L; Zuckermann A; Dong G; Cornu-Artis C; Lopez P
    Am J Transplant; 2013 May; 13(5):1203-16. PubMed ID: 23433101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Everolimus with reduced cyclosporine versus MMF with standard cyclosporine in de novo heart transplant recipients.
    Lehmkuhl HB; Arizon J; Viganò M; Almenar L; Gerosa G; Maccherini M; Varnous S; Musumeci F; Hexham JM; Mange KC; Livi U;
    Transplantation; 2009 Jul; 88(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 19584690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Everolimus (Certican) 12-month safety and efficacy versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant recipients.
    Vítko S; Margreiter R; Weimar W; Dantal J; Viljoen HG; Li Y; Jappe A; Cretin N;
    Transplantation; 2004 Nov; 78(10):1532-40. PubMed ID: 15599319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lower incidence of cytomegalovirus infection with everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo cardiac transplant recipients: a randomized, multicenter study.
    Viganò M; Dengler T; Mattei MF; Poncelet A; Vanhaecke J; Vermes E; Kleinloog R; Li Y; Gezahegen Y; Delgado JF;
    Transpl Infect Dis; 2010 Feb; 12(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 19744284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A 1-year randomized controlled study of everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil with reduced-dose cyclosporine in maintenance heart transplant recipients.
    Bara C; Dengler T; Hack MA; Ladenburger S; Lehmkuhl HB
    Transplant Proc; 2013; 45(6):2387-92. PubMed ID: 23953553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective clinical trial comparing two immunosuppressive regimens, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus everolimus and low-dose cyclosporine, in de novo renal transplant recipients: results at 6 months follow-up.
    Favi E; Citterio F; Spagnoletti G; Gargiulo A; Delreno F; Romagnoli J; Castagneto M
    Transplant Proc; 2009 May; 41(4):1152-5. PubMed ID: 19460503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in the prevention of rejection in de novo renal transplant recipients: a 3-year randomized, multicenter, phase III study.
    Lorber MI; Mulgaonkar S; Butt KM; Elkhammas E; Mendez R; Rajagopalan PR; Kahan B; Sollinger H; Li Y; Cretin N; Tedesco H;
    Transplantation; 2005 Jul; 80(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 16041270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-year efficacy and safety results from a study of everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant patients.
    Vítko S; Margreiter R; Weimar W; Dantal J; Kuypers D; Winkler M; Øyen O; Viljoen HG; Filiptsev P; Sadek S; Li Y; Cretin N; Budde K;
    Am J Transplant; 2005 Oct; 5(10):2521-30. PubMed ID: 16162203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Everolimus initiation and early calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal in heart transplant recipients: a randomized trial.
    Andreassen AK; Andersson B; Gustafsson F; Eiskjaer H; Radegran G; Gude E; Jansson K; Solbu D; Sigurdardottir V; Arora S; Dellgren G; Gullestad L;
    Am J Transplant; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1828-38. PubMed ID: 25041227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy by intravascular ultrasound in heart transplant patients: substudy from the Everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil randomized, multicenter trial.
    Kobashigawa JA; Pauly DF; Starling RC; Eisen H; Ross H; Wang SS; Cantin B; Hill JA; Lopez P; Dong G; Nicholls SJ;
    JACC Heart Fail; 2013 Oct; 1(5):389-99. PubMed ID: 24621971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Renal function at two years in liver transplant patients receiving everolimus: results of a randomized, multicenter study.
    Saliba F; De Simone P; Nevens F; De Carlis L; Metselaar HJ; Beckebaum S; Jonas S; Sudan D; Fischer L; Duvoux C; Chavin KD; Koneru B; Huang MA; Chapman WC; Foltys D; Dong G; Lopez PM; Fung J; Junge G;
    Am J Transplant; 2013 Jul; 13(7):1734-45. PubMed ID: 23714399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Economic evaluation of everolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine in de novo heart transplantation.
    Annemans L; Lemkuhl H; Tenderich G; Schulz U; Yang XL; Ricci JF; Hetzer R
    Transplant Proc; 2007 Dec; 39(10):3306-12. PubMed ID: 18089377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus Plus Low-Dose Tacrolimus Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil Plus Standard-Dose Tacrolimus in De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients: 12-Month Data.
    Qazi Y; Shaffer D; Kaplan B; Kim DY; Luan FL; Peddi VR; Shihab F; Tomlanovich S; Yilmaz S; McCague K; Patel D; Mulgaonkar S
    Am J Transplant; 2017 May; 17(5):1358-1369. PubMed ID: 27775865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cyclosporine lowering with everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in heart transplant recipients: long-term follow-up of the SHIRAKISS randomized, prospective study.
    Potena L; Prestinenzi P; Bianchi IG; Masetti M; Romani P; Magnani G; Fallani F; Coccolo F; Russo A; Ponticelli C; Rapezzi C; Grigioni F; Branzi A
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2012 Jun; 31(6):565-70. PubMed ID: 22341702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An open-label, randomized trial indicates that everolimus with tacrolimus or cyclosporine is comparable to standard immunosuppression in de novo kidney transplant patients.
    Sommerer C; Suwelack B; Dragun D; Schenker P; Hauser IA; Witzke O; Hugo C; Kamar N; Merville P; Junge M; Thaiss F; Nashan B;
    Kidney Int; 2019 Jul; 96(1):231-244. PubMed ID: 31027892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safety and efficacy of the early introduction of everolimus with reduced-exposure cyclosporine a in de novo kidney recipients.
    Oh CK; Huh KH; Ha J; Kim YH; Kim YL; Kim YS
    Transplantation; 2015 Jan; 99(1):180-6. PubMed ID: 24983307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Everolimus Initiation With Early Calcineurin Inhibitor Withdrawal in De Novo Heart Transplant Recipients: Long-term Follow-up From the Randomized SCHEDULE Study.
    Gustafsson F; Andreassen AK; Andersson B; Eiskjær H; Rådegran G; Gude E; Jansson K; Solbu D; Karason K; Arora S; Dellgren G; Gullestad L;
    Transplantation; 2020 Jan; 104(1):154-164. PubMed ID: 30893292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection in primary cadaveric renal allograft recipients. U.S. Renal Transplant Mycophenolate Mofetil Study Group.
    Sollinger HW
    Transplantation; 1995 Aug; 60(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 7645033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil vs. cyclosporine plus everolimus in deceased donor kidney transplant recipients: three-yr results of a single-center prospective clinical trial.
    Favi E; Spagnoletti G; Salerno MP; Pedroso JA; Romagnoli J; Citterio F
    Clin Transplant; 2013; 27(4):E359-67. PubMed ID: 23710603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Observational study with everolimus (Certican) in combination with low-dose cyclosporine in de novo heart transplant recipients.
    Lehmkuhl HB; Mai D; Dandel M; Knosalla C; Hiemann NE; Grauhan O; Huebler M; Pasic M; Weng Y; Meyer R; Rothenburger M; Hummel M; Hetzer R
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2007 Jul; 26(7):700-4. PubMed ID: 17613400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.