189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2343324)
1. [Removal torques of small screws of steel and titanium with different surfaces].
Eulenberger J; Steinemann SG
Unfallchirurg; 1990 Mar; 93(3):96-9. PubMed ID: 2343324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of surface topography on removal of cortical bone screws in a novel sheep model.
Pearce AI; Pearce SG; Schwieger K; Milz S; Schneider E; Archer CW; Richards RG
J Orthop Res; 2008 Oct; 26(10):1377-83. PubMed ID: 18464266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Titanium, steel and their combination in bone surgery].
Rüedi Th; Perren SM; Pohler O; Riede U
Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1975; Suppl():395-8. PubMed ID: 1207267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A quantitative comparison of machined commercially pure titanium and titanium-aluminum-vanadium implants in rabbit bone.
Johansson CB; Han CH; Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 9638001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia.
Cordioli G; Majzoub Z; Piattelli A; Scarano A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 11055134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does surface anodisation of titanium implants change osseointegration and make their extraction from bone any easier?
Langhoff JD; Mayer J; Faber L; Kaestner SB; Guibert G; Zlinszky K; Auer JA; von Rechenberg B
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2008; 21(3):202-10. PubMed ID: 18536845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical and histomorphometric study on the bone-screw interface of bioactive ceramic-coated titanium screws.
Lee JH; Ryu HS; Lee DS; Hong KS; Chang BS; Lee CK
Biomaterials; 2005 Jun; 26(16):3249-57. PubMed ID: 15603820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preloads generated with repeated tightening in three types of screws used in dental implant assemblies.
Byrne D; Jacobs S; O'Connell B; Houston F; Claffey N
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 16681498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the soft tissue interface at titanium implants with different surface treatments: experimental study on rabbits.
Ungersböck A; Pohler O; Perren SM
Biomed Mater Eng; 1994; 4(4):317-25. PubMed ID: 7950879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pedicle screw surface coatings improve fixation in nonfusion spinal constructs.
Upasani VV; Farnsworth CL; Tomlinson T; Chambers RC; Tsutsui S; Slivka MA; Mahar AT; Newton PO
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(4):335-43. PubMed ID: 19182704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanical and histological analysis of bone-pedicle screw interface in vivo: titanium versus stainless steel.
Sun C; Huang G; Christensen FB; Dalstra M; Overgaard S; Bünger C
Chin Med J (Engl); 1999 May; 112(5):456-60. PubMed ID: 11593519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone.
Wennerberg A; Ektessabi A; Albrektsson T; Johansson C; Andersson B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 9274077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stainless steel screws coated with bisphosphonates gave stronger fixation and more surrounding bone. Histomorphometry in rats.
Wermelin K; Suska F; Tengvall P; Thomsen P; Aspenberg P
Bone; 2008 Feb; 42(2):365-71. PubMed ID: 18055289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bone tissue response to commercially pure titanium implants blasted with fine and coarse particles of aluminum oxide.
Wennerberg A; Albrektsson T; Andersson B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 8820121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screw fixation of the syndesmosis: a cadaver model comparing stainless steel and titanium screws and three and four cortical fixation.
Beumer A; Campo MM; Niesing R; Day J; Kleinrensink GJ; Swierstra BA
Injury; 2005 Jan; 36(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 15589915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of the torque applied to bone screws by trauma surgeons. Comparisons based on years of experience and material of implant construction.
McGuire RA; St John KR; Agnew SG
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 1995 Mar; 24(3):254-6. PubMed ID: 7773668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Increasing bending strength of tibial locking screws: mechanical tests and finite element analyses.
Chao CK; Hsu CC; Wang JL; Lin J
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Jan; 22(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 16959388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A torque removal study on the primary stability of orthodontic titanium screw mini-implants in the cortical bone of dog femurs.
Okazaki J; Komasa Y; Sakai D; Kamada A; Ikeo T; Toda I; Suwa F; Inoue M; Etoh T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jul; 37(7):647-50. PubMed ID: 18554870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of materials for fixation implants on local infection. An experimental study of steel versus titanium DCP in rabbits.
Arens S; Schlegel U; Printzen G; Ziegler WJ; Perren SM; Hansis M
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1996 Jul; 78(4):647-51. PubMed ID: 8682836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability and morphology) of titanium and dental implant removal torque.
Elias CN; Oshida Y; Lima JH; Muller CA
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2008 Jul; 1(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 19627788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
