These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23433492)

  • 1. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation for refractory angina (RASCAL study): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.
    Eldabe S; Raphael J; Thomson S; Manca A; de Belder M; Aggarwal R; Banks M; Brookes M; Merotra S; Adeniba R; Davies E; Taylor RS
    Trials; 2013 Feb; 14():57. PubMed ID: 23433492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Refractory Angina (RASCAL Study): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Eldabe S; Thomson S; Duarte R; Brookes M; deBelder M; Raphael J; Davies E; Taylor R
    Neuromodulation; 2016 Jan; 19(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 26387883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does a Screening Trial for Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Pain of Neuropathic Origin have Clinical Utility and Cost-Effectiveness? (TRIAL-STIM Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Eldabe S; Gulve A; Thomson S; Baranidharan G; Duarte R; Jowett S; Sandhu H; Chadwick R; Brookes M; Tariq A; Earle J; Bell J; Kansal A; Rhodes S; Taylor RS
    Trials; 2018 Nov; 19(1):633. PubMed ID: 30446003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of economic effectiveness in treatment of neuropathic pain and refractory angina pectoris using spinal cord stimulation.
    Harat A; Sokal P; Zieliński P; Harat M; Rusicka T; Herbowski L
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2012; 21(5):653-63. PubMed ID: 23356203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spinal cord stimulation for refractory angina pectoris: a retrospective analysis of efficacy and cost-benefit.
    Yu W; Maru F; Edner M; Hellström K; Kahan T; Persson H
    Coron Artery Dis; 2004 Feb; 15(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 15201618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hospital utilization and costs for spinal cord stimulation compared with enhanced external counterpulsation for refractory angina pectoris.
    Bondesson SM; Jakobsson U; Edvinsson L; Hallberg IR
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Feb; 19(1):139-47. PubMed ID: 22040457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multicentre, double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial of 10 khz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation for chronic neuropathic low back pain (MODULATE-LBP): a trial protocol.
    Al-Kaisy A; Royds J; Palmisani S; Pang D; Wesley S; Taylor RS; Cook A; Eldabe S; McCracken L; Duarte R; Fairbank J
    Trials; 2020 Jan; 21(1):111. PubMed ID: 31992344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spinal cord stimulation for predominant low back pain in failed back surgery syndrome: study protocol for an international multicenter randomized controlled trial (PROMISE study).
    Rigoard P; Desai MJ; North RB; Taylor RS; Annemans L; Greening C; Tan Y; Van den Abeele C; Shipley J; Kumar K
    Trials; 2013 Nov; 14():376. PubMed ID: 24195916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Design and rationale of the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris (SCRAP) trial.
    Vervaat FE; van der Gaag A; Smetsers C; Barneveld PC; Van't Veer M; Teeuwen K; van Suijlekom H; Dekker L; Wijnbergen IF
    Clin Cardiol; 2023 Jun; 46(6):689-697. PubMed ID: 37013654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preoperative behavioural intervention to reduce drinking before elective orthopaedic surgery: the PRE-OP BIRDS feasibility RCT.
    Snowden C; Lynch E; Avery L; Haighton C; Howel D; Mamasoula V; Gilvarry E; McColl E; Prentis J; Gerrand C; Steel A; Goudie N; Howe N; Kaner E
    Health Technol Assess; 2020 Mar; 24(12):1-176. PubMed ID: 32131964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhanced External Counterpulsation (EECP): An Evidence-Based Analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2006; 6(5):1-70. PubMed ID: 23074496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Chuna manual therapy versus conventional usual care for nonacute low back pain: study protocol for a pilot multicenter, pragmatic randomized controlled trial (pCRN study).
    Shin BC; Kim MR; Cho JH; Jung JY; Kim KW; Lee JH; Nam K; Lee MH; Hwang EH; Heo KH; Kim N; Ha IH
    Trials; 2017 Jan; 18(1):26. PubMed ID: 28095892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A phase II, sham-controlled, double-blinded study testing the safety and efficacy of the coronary sinus reducer in patients with refractory angina: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Jolicœur EM; Banai S; Henry TD; Schwartz M; Doucet S; White CJ; Edelman E; Verheye S
    Trials; 2013 Feb; 14():46. PubMed ID: 23413981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Emadi A; Chua JV; Talwani R; Bentzen SM; Baddley J
    Trials; 2020 Oct; 21(1):897. PubMed ID: 33115543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The feasibility of a randomized controlled trial of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer--the ROMIO (Randomized Oesophagectomy: Minimally Invasive or Open) study: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Avery KN; Metcalfe C; Berrisford R; Barham CP; Donovan JL; Elliott J; Falk SJ; Goldin R; Hanna G; Hollowood AA; Krysztopik R; Noble S; Sanders G; Streets CG; Titcomb DR; Wheatley T; Blazeby JM
    Trials; 2014 Jun; 15():200. PubMed ID: 24888266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of spinal cord stimulation as an adjunct therapy for chronic refractory angina pectoris.
    Imran TF; Malapero R; Qavi AH; Hasan Z; de la Torre B; Patel YR; Yong RJ; Djousse L; Gaziano JM; Gerhard-Herman MD
    Int J Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 227():535-542. PubMed ID: 27836302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of refractory angina: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
    Taylor RS; De Vries J; Buchser E; Dejongste MJ
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2009 Mar; 9():13. PubMed ID: 19320999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health screening clinic to reduce absenteeism and presenteeism among NHS Staff: eTHOS a pilot RCT.
    Adams R; Jordan RE; Maher A; Adab P; Barrett T; Bevan S; Cooper L; DuRand I; Edwards F; Hardy P; Harris C; Heneghan NR; Jolly K; Jowett S; Marshall T; O'Hara M; Poyner C; Rai K; Rickards H; Riley R; Ives N; Sadhra S; Tearne S; Walters G; Sapey E
    Health Soc Care Deliv Res; 2024 Aug; 12(23):1-105. PubMed ID: 39192689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An open label, single-centre, randomized trial of spinal cord stimulation vs. percutaneous myocardial laser revascularization in patients with refractory angina pectoris: the SPiRiT trial.
    McNab D; Khan SN; Sharples LD; Ryan JY; Freeman C; Caine N; Tait S; Hardy I; Schofield PM
    Eur Heart J; 2006 May; 27(9):1048-53. PubMed ID: 16554313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pre-consultation educational group intervention to improve shared decision-making in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.
    Platt J; Baxter N; Jones J; Metcalfe K; Causarano N; Hofer SO; O'Neill A; Cheng T; Starenkyj E; Zhong T
    Trials; 2013 Jul; 14():199. PubMed ID: 23829442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.