595 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23433706)
1. A modified Vancouver Scar Scale linked with TBSA (mVSS-TBSA): Inter-rater reliability of an innovative burn scar assessment method.
Gankande TU; Wood FM; Edgar DW; Duke JM; DeJong HM; Henderson AE; Wallace HJ
Burns; 2013 Sep; 39(6):1142-9. PubMed ID: 23433706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of scar assessments performed with an integrated skin testing device - the DermaLab Combo(®).
Gankande TU; Duke JM; Danielsen PL; DeJong HM; Wood FM; Wallace HJ
Burns; 2014 Dec; 40(8):1521-9. PubMed ID: 24630817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determination of inter-rater reliability in pediatric burn scar assessment using a modified version of the Vancouver Scar Scale.
Forbes-Duchart L; Marshall S; Strock A; Cooper JE
J Burn Care Res; 2007; 28(3):460-7. PubMed ID: 17438503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interpretation of the DermaLab Combo® pigmentation and vascularity measurements in burn scar assessment: an exploratory analysis.
Gankande TU; Duke JM; Wood FM; Wallace HJ
Burns; 2015 Sep; 41(6):1176-85. PubMed ID: 25703660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigating the intra- and inter-rater reliability of a panel of subjective and objective burn scar measurement tools.
Lee KC; Bamford A; Gardiner F; Agovino A; Ter Horst B; Bishop J; Sitch A; Grover L; Logan A; Moiemen NS
Burns; 2019 Sep; 45(6):1311-1324. PubMed ID: 31327551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of tissue ultrasound palpation system (TUPS) in objective scar evaluation.
Lau JC; Li-Tsang CW; Zheng YP
Burns; 2005 Jun; 31(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 15896506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative measurement of hypertrophic scar: interrater reliability and concurrent validity.
Nedelec B; Correa JA; Rachelska G; Armour A; LaSalle L
J Burn Care Res; 2008; 29(3):501-11. PubMed ID: 18388576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Scarbase Duo(®): Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and validity of a compact dual scar assessment tool.
Fell M; Meirte J; Anthonissen M; Maertens K; Pleat J; Moortgat P
Burns; 2016 Mar; 42(2):336-44. PubMed ID: 26774602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modified Vancouver Scar Scale score is linked with quality of life after burn.
Finlay V; Burrows S; Kendell R; Berghuber A; Chong V; Tan J; Edgar DW; Wood F
Burns; 2017 Jun; 43(4):741-746. PubMed ID: 28034668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative measurement of hypertrophic scar: intrarater reliability, sensitivity, and specificity.
Nedelec B; Correa JA; Rachelska G; Armour A; LaSalle L
J Burn Care Res; 2008; 29(3):489-500. PubMed ID: 18388577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability and Photographic Equivalency of the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale, an Outcome Measure for Postoperative Scars.
Kantor J
JAMA Dermatol; 2017 Jan; 153(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 27806156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Intra-rater reliability and validity of ultrasonography in the evaluation of hypertrophic scars caused by burns.
Lee SY; Cho YS; Kim L; Joo SY; Seo CH
Burns; 2023 Mar; 49(2):344-352. PubMed ID: 35459576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of the predictors of hypertrophic scarring pain and neuropathic pain after burn.
Shu F; Liu H; Lou X; Zhou Z; Zhao Z; Liu Y; Bai X; Luo P; Zheng Y; Xiao S; Xia Z
Burns; 2022 Sep; 48(6):1425-1434. PubMed ID: 34670714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Scoring reading parameters: An inter-rater reliability study using the MNREAD chart.
Baskaran K; Macedo AF; He Y; Hernandez-Moreno L; Queirós T; Mansfield JS; Calabrèse A
PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0216775. PubMed ID: 31173587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective, before-after cohort study to assess the efficacy of laser therapy on hypertrophic burn scars.
Hultman CS; Edkins RE; Wu C; Calvert CT; Cairns BA
Ann Plast Surg; 2013 May; 70(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 23542846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inter-rater reliability of the French version of the core index for melancholia.
Thuile J; Even C; Friedman S; Guelfi JD
J Affect Disord; 2005 Oct; 88(2):193-208. PubMed ID: 16122809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasound is a reproducible and valid tool for measuring scar height in children with burn scars: A cross-sectional study of the psychometric properties and utility of the ultrasound and 3D camera.
Simons M; Kee EG; Kimble R; Tyack Z
Burns; 2017 Aug; 43(5):993-1001. PubMed ID: 28238405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliable scar scoring system to assess photographs of burn patients.
Mecott GA; Finnerty CC; Herndon DN; Al-Mousawi AM; Branski LK; Hegde S; Kraft R; Williams FN; Maldonado SA; Rivero HG; Rodriguez-Escobar N; Jeschke MG
J Surg Res; 2015 Dec; 199(2):688-97. PubMed ID: 26092214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability testing of a new scar assessment tool, Matching Assessment of Scars and Photographs (MAPS).
Masters M; McMahon M; Svens B
J Burn Care Rehabil; 2005; 26(3):273-84. PubMed ID: 15879752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Identification of factors predicting scar outcome after burn in adults: A prospective case-control study.
Wallace HJ; Fear MW; Crowe MM; Martin LJ; Wood FM
Burns; 2017 Sep; 43(6):1271-1283. PubMed ID: 28420569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
