These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23433947)

  • 1. Mock juror sensitivity to forensic evidence in drug facilitated sexual assaults.
    Schuller RA; Ryan A; Krauss D; Jenkins G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2013; 36(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 23433947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of negative forensic evidence on mock jurors' perceptions of a trial of drug-facilitated sexual assault.
    Jenkins G; Schuller RA
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Aug; 31(4):369-80. PubMed ID: 17211690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of expert witness testimony and complainant cognitive statements on mock jurors' perceptions of rape trial testimony.
    Ryan N; Westera N
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(5):693-705. PubMed ID: 31984046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Expert testimony influences juror decisions in criminal trials involving recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse.
    Khurshid A; Jacquin KM
    J Child Sex Abus; 2013; 22(8):949-67. PubMed ID: 24283545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neuroimage evidence and the insanity defense.
    Schweitzer NJ; Saks MJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(4):592-607. PubMed ID: 21744379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mock juror perception of sexual assault nurse examiner testimony.
    Wasarhaley NE; Simcic TA; Golding JM
    Violence Vict; 2012; 27(4):500-11. PubMed ID: 22978071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of acknowledging mock jurors' feelings on affective and cognitive biases: it depends on the sample.
    McCabe JG; Krauss DA
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):331-57. PubMed ID: 21766326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The credibility of recovered memory testimony: exploring the effects of alleged victim and perpetrator gender.
    Bornstein BH; Muller SL
    Child Abuse Negl; 2001 Nov; 25(11):1415-26. PubMed ID: 11766008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relations among mock jurors' attitudes, trial evidence, and their selections of an insanity defense verdict: a path analytic approach.
    Poulson RL; Brondino MJ; Brown H; Braithwaite RL
    Psychol Rep; 1998 Feb; 82(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9520530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Slater Method.
    Wall BW; Krupp BH
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):525-6. PubMed ID: 14974810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Expert testimony and the effects of a biological approach, psychopathy, and juror attitudes in cases of insanity.
    Rendell JA; Huss MT; Jensen ML
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(3):411-25. PubMed ID: 20014145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A meta-analysis of the emotional victim effect for female adult rape complainants: Does complainant distress influence credibility?
    Nitschke FT; McKimmie BM; Vanman EJ
    Psychol Bull; 2019 Oct; 145(10):953-979. PubMed ID: 31282696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Commentary: evidence-based practice and forensic psychiatry.
    Schneider RD
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):503-8. PubMed ID: 20018998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of psychiatry in death penalty defense.
    Beck JC
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(4):453-63. PubMed ID: 8054675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of rehabilitative voir dire on juror bias and decision making.
    Crocker CB; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Jun; 34(3):212-26. PubMed ID: 19644740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Who needs capacity?
    Buchanan A
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 40():1-5. PubMed ID: 25939285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of rational and experiential information processing of expert testimony in death penalty cases.
    Krauss DA; Lieberman JD; Olson J
    Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(6):801-22. PubMed ID: 15568199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Confessions and expert testimony.
    Weiss KJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 14974801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A neurolaw perspective on psychiatric assessments of criminal responsibility: decision-making, mental disorder, and the brain.
    Meynen G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2013; 36(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 23433730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Mental state and the criminal responsibility--legal regulations and medical criteria in Poland and other countries].
    Bolechała F
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2009; 59(4):309-19. PubMed ID: 20860304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.