These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23434342)

  • 21. Effect of 2 different thoracolumbar orthoses on the stability of the spine during various body movements.
    Kienle A; Saidi S; Oberst M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Aug; 38(17):E1082-9. PubMed ID: 23644685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine.
    Singh K; Vaccaro AR; Kim J; Lorenz EP; Lim TH; An HS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):2352-8; discussion 2358. PubMed ID: 14560082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a locked plate and wedged graft effectively stabilizes flexion-distraction stage-3 injury in the lower cervical spine: a biomechanical study.
    Paxinos O; Ghanayem AJ; Zindrick MR; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Hadjipavlou A; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(1):E9-15. PubMed ID: 19127153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effectiveness of Adjustable Cervical Orthoses and Modular Cervical Thoracic Orthoses in Restricting Neck Motion: A Comparative In vivo Biomechanical Study.
    Gao F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Oct; 40(19):E1046-51. PubMed ID: 26076435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of the Sheffield Support Snood, an innovative cervical orthosis designed for people affected by neck muscle weakness.
    Pancani S; Rowson J; Tindale W; Heron N; Langley J; McCarthy AD; Quinn A; Reed H; Stanton A; Shaw PJ; McDermott CJ; Mazzà C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Feb; 32():201-6. PubMed ID: 26673978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of the flat torso versus the elevated torso shoulder pad removal techniques in a cadaveric cervical spine instability model.
    Horodyski M; DiPaola CP; DiPaola MJ; Conrad BP; Del Rossi G; Rechtine GR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(7):687-91. PubMed ID: 19333100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the Minerva cervicothoracic orthosis.
    Sharpe KP; Rao S; Ziogas A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Jul; 20(13):1475-9. PubMed ID: 8623066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of efficacy and 3D kinematic characteristics of cervical orthoses.
    Zhang S; Wortley M; Clowers K; Krusenklaus JH
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Mar; 20(3):264-9. PubMed ID: 15698698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Axial load-dependent cervical spinal alterations during simulated upright posture: a comparison of healthy controls and patients with cervical degenerative disease.
    Kimura S; Hesselink JR; Garfin SR; Kawaji Y; Hasegawa K; Hargens AR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Feb; 2(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 15739524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Disc replacement adjacent to cervical fusion: a biomechanical comparison of hybrid construct versus two-level fusion.
    Lee MJ; Dumonski M; Phillips FM; Voronov LI; Renner SM; Carandang G; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Nov; 36(23):1932-9. PubMed ID: 21289581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation for multilevel cervical arthrodesis: an in vitro human cadaveric study of the operative and adjacent segment kinematics.
    Dmitriev AE; Kuklo TR; Lehman RA; Rosner MK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):E188-96. PubMed ID: 17413459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effectiveness of various cervical orthoses. An in vivo comparison of the mechanical stability provided by several widely used models.
    Sandler AJ; Dvorak J; Humke T; Grob D; Daniels W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Jul; 21(14):1624-9. PubMed ID: 8839463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Effect of Cricoid Pressure on the Unstable Cervical Spine.
    Prasarn ML; Horodyski M; Schneider P; Wendling A; Hagberg CA; Rechtine GR
    J Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 50(3):427-32. PubMed ID: 26475486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of the kinematic features between the in vivo active and passive flexion-extension of the subaxial cervical spine and their biomechanical implications.
    Hsu WH; Chen YL; Lui TN; Chen TY; Hsu YH; Lin CL; Ming-Lun T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(8):630-8. PubMed ID: 21178845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cervical spine motion in manual versus Jackson table turning methods in a cadaveric global instability model.
    DiPaola MJ; DiPaola CP; Conrad BP; Horodyski M; Del Rossi G; Sawers A; Bloch D; Rechtine GR
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):273-80. PubMed ID: 18525488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An in vitro model of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Melnyk AD; Kingwell SP; Zhu Q; Chak JD; Cripton PA; Fisher CG; Dvorak MF; Oxland TR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(14):E870-7. PubMed ID: 23558441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Understanding whiplash injury and prevention mechanisms using a human model of the neck.
    Ivancic PC; Xiao M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 Jul; 43(4):1392-9. PubMed ID: 21545871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Role of age and injury mechanism on cervical spine injury tolerance from head contact loading.
    Yoganandan N; Chirvi S; Voo L; Pintar FA; Banerjee A
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(2):165-172. PubMed ID: 28738168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparing cervical spine motion with different halo devices in a cadaveric cervical instability model.
    DiPaola CP; Sawers A; Conrad BP; Horodyski M; DiPaola MJ; Del Rossi G; Rechtine GR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 19139664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.