94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23435117)
1. Does random tree puzzle produce Yule-Harding trees in the many-taxon limit?
Zhu S; Steel M
Math Biosci; 2013 May; 243(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 23435117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Random Tree-Puzzle leads to the Yule-Harding distribution.
Vinh le S; Fuehrer A; von Haeseler A
Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Feb; 28(2):873-7. PubMed ID: 20705907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Theoretical foundation of the balanced minimum evolution method of phylogenetic inference and its relationship to weighted least-squares tree fitting.
Desper R; Gascuel O
Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Mar; 21(3):587-98. PubMed ID: 14694080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On cherry and pitchfork distributions of random rooted and unrooted phylogenetic trees.
Choi KP; Thompson A; Wu T
Theor Popul Biol; 2020 Apr; 132():92-104. PubMed ID: 32135170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The most parsimonious tree for random data.
Fischer M; Galla M; Herbst L; Steel M
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2014 Nov; 80():165-8. PubMed ID: 25079136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On asymptotic joint distributions of cherries and pitchforks for random phylogenetic trees.
Choi KP; Kaur G; Wu T
J Math Biol; 2021 Sep; 83(4):40. PubMed ID: 34554333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Root location in random trees: a polarity property of all sampling consistent phylogenetic models except one.
Steel M
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2012 Oct; 65(1):345-8. PubMed ID: 22772025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On joint subtree distributions under two evolutionary models.
Wu T; Choi KP
Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Apr; 108():13-23. PubMed ID: 26607430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On statistical tests of phylogenetic tree imbalance: the Sackin and other indices revisited.
Blum MG; François O
Math Biosci; 2005 Jun; 195(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 15893336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Equality of Shapley value and fair proportion index in phylogenetic trees.
Fuchs M; Jin EY
J Math Biol; 2015 Nov; 71(5):1133-47. PubMed ID: 25487179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Majority rule has transition ratio 4 on Yule trees under a 2-state symmetric model.
Mossel E; Steel M
J Theor Biol; 2014 Nov; 360():315-318. PubMed ID: 25108194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Topology and inference for Yule trees with multiple states.
Popovic L; Rivas M
J Math Biol; 2016 Nov; 73(5):1251-1291. PubMed ID: 27009067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the convergence of the maximum likelihood estimator for the transition rate under a 2-state symmetric model.
Ho LST; Dinh V; Matsen FA; Suchard MA
J Math Biol; 2020 Mar; 80(4):1119-1138. PubMed ID: 31754778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Maximum parsimony on subsets of taxa.
Fischer M; Thatte BD
J Theor Biol; 2009 Sep; 260(2):290-3. PubMed ID: 19538973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ancestral state estimation and taxon sampling density.
Salisbury BA; Kim J
Syst Biol; 2001 Aug; 50(4):557-64. PubMed ID: 12116653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating species trees using approximate Bayesian computation.
Fan HH; Kubatko LS
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2011 May; 59(2):354-63. PubMed ID: 21397706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gene tree distributions under the coalescent process.
Degnan JH; Salter LA
Evolution; 2005 Jan; 59(1):24-37. PubMed ID: 15792224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Probability distributions of ancestries and genealogical distances on stochastically generated rooted binary trees.
Mulder WH
J Theor Biol; 2011 Jul; 280(1):139-45. PubMed ID: 21527261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distances that perfectly mislead.
Huson DH; Steel M
Syst Biol; 2004 Apr; 53(2):327-32. PubMed ID: 15205056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating trees from filtered data: identifiability of models for morphological phylogenetics.
Allman ES; Holder MT; Rhodes JA
J Theor Biol; 2010 Mar; 263(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 20004210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
