These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23435851)

  • 21. The impact of combined sewer outflows on urban water quality: Spatio-temporal patterns of fecal coliform in indianapolis.
    Orr I; Mazari K; Shukle JT; Li R; Filippelli GM
    Environ Pollut; 2023 Jun; 327():121531. PubMed ID: 37004861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fecal coliform modeling under two flow scenarios in St. Louis Bay of Mississippi.
    Liu Z; Hashim NB; Kingery WL; Huddleston DH
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2010; 45(3):282-91. PubMed ID: 20390869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Geographical variation in ribotype profiles of Escherichia coli isolates from humans, swine, poultry, beef, and dairy cattle in Florida.
    Scott TM; Parveen S; Portier KM; Rose JB; Tamplin ML; Farrah SR; Koo A; Lukasik J
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2003 Feb; 69(2):1089-92. PubMed ID: 12571033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Determining the primary sources of fecal pollution using microbial source tracking assays combined with land-use information in the Edwards Aquifer.
    Hinojosa J; Green J; Estrada F; Herrera J; Mata T; Phan D; Pasha ABMT; Matta A; Johnson D; Kapoor V
    Water Res; 2020 Oct; 184():116211. PubMed ID: 32721766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Enterococcal Concentrations in a Coastal Ecosystem Are a Function of Fecal Source Input, Environmental Conditions, and Environmental Sources.
    Rothenheber D; Jones S
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 84(17):. PubMed ID: 30006393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Identifying the primary sources of fecal contamination along the beaches and rivers of Trinidad.
    Bridgemohan RSH; Bachoon DS; Wang Y; Bridgemohan P; Mutiti C; Ramsubhag A
    J Water Health; 2020 Apr; 18(2):229-238. PubMed ID: 32300095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Microbial source tracking in a rural watershed dominated by cattle.
    Graves AK; Hagedorn C; Brooks A; Hagedorn RL; Martin E
    Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3729-39. PubMed ID: 17582454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Identification of source of faecal pollution of Tirumanimuttar River, Tamilnadu, India using microbial source tracking.
    Murugan K; Prabhakaran P; Al-Sohaibani S; Sekar K
    Environ Monit Assess; 2012 Oct; 184(10):6001-12. PubMed ID: 22016043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Human-Associated Lachnospiraceae Genetic Markers Improve Detection of Fecal Pollution Sources in Urban Waters.
    Feng S; Bootsma M; McLellan SL
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Jul; 84(14):. PubMed ID: 29728386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fecal contamination in shallow temperate estuarine lagoon: Source of the pollution and environmental factors.
    Kataržytė M; Mėžinė J; Vaičiūtė D; Liaugaudaitė S; Mukauskaitė K; Umgiesser G; Schernewski G
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2018 Aug; 133():762-772. PubMed ID: 30041374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A geospatial analysis of land use and stormwater management on fecal coliform contamination in North Carolina streams.
    Vitro KA; BenDor TK; Jordanova TV; Miles B
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 603-604():709-727. PubMed ID: 28359567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Climate relationships to fecal bacterial densities in Maryland shellfish harvest waters.
    Leight AK; Hood R; Wood R; Brohawn K
    Water Res; 2016 Feb; 89():270-81. PubMed ID: 26689664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Investigation of relationships between fecal contamination, cattle grazing, human recreation, and microbial source tracking markers in a mixed-land-use rangeland watershed.
    Joseph N; Lucas J; Viswanath N; Findlay R; Sprinkle J; Strickland MS; Winford E; Kolok AS
    Water Res; 2021 Apr; 194():116921. PubMed ID: 33609910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Temporal genetic variability and host sources of Escherichia coli associated with fecal pollution from domesticated animals in the shellfish culture environment of Xiangshan Bay, East China Sea.
    Fu LL; Shuai JB; Wang Y; Ma HJ; Li JR
    Environ Pollut; 2011 Oct; 159(10):2808-14. PubMed ID: 21645948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Application of an integrated community analysis approach for microbial source tracking in a coastal creek.
    Cao Y; Van De Werfhorst LC; Sercu B; Murray JL; Holden PA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Sep; 45(17):7195-201. PubMed ID: 21786742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Simulating fecal coliform bacteria loading from an urbanizing watershed.
    Im S; Brannan KM; Mostaghimi S; Cho J
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2004; 39(3):663-79. PubMed ID: 15055933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Uneven genotypic diversity of
    Garabetian F; Vitte I; Sabourin A; Moussard H; Jouanillou A; Mornet L; Lesne M; Lyautey E
    Can J Microbiol; 2020 Dec; 66(12):698-712. PubMed ID: 32730720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Human and animal microbial source tracking in a tropical river with multiple land use activities.
    Kongprajug A; Chyerochana N; Somnark P; Leelapanang Kampaengthong P; Mongkolsuk S; Sirikanchana K
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2019 May; 222(4):645-654. PubMed ID: 30686524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Direct comparison of four bacterial source tracking methods and use of composite data sets.
    Casarez EA; Pillai SD; Mott JB; Vargas M; Dean KE; Di Giovanni GD
    J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Aug; 103(2):350-64. PubMed ID: 17650195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of bacterial indicators and methods in rural surface waters.
    Kloot RW; Radakovich B; Huang X; Brantley DD
    Environ Monit Assess; 2006 Oct; 121(1-3):275-87. PubMed ID: 16741789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.