These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23435968)

  • 1. Research ethics committee auditing: the experience of a university hospital.
    Marchetti D; Spagnolo A; Cicerone M; Cascini F; La Monaca G; Spagnolo AG
    HEC Forum; 2013 Sep; 25(3):257-68. PubMed ID: 23435968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 'Screening audit' as a quality assurance tool in good clinical practice compliant research environments.
    Park S; Nam CM; Park S; Noh YH; Ahn CR; Yu WS; Kim BK; Kim SM; Kim JS; Rha SY
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Apr; 19(1):30. PubMed ID: 29699559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Regulatory, scientific, and ethical issues arising from institutional activity in one of the 90 Italian Research Ethics Committees.
    Benfatto G; ; ; Drago F
    BMC Med Ethics; 2021 Apr; 22(1):40. PubMed ID: 33827541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Above reproach: developing a comprehensive ethics and compliance program.
    Yuspeh A; Whalen K; Cecelic J; Clifton S; Cobb L; Eddy M; Fainter J; Packard J; Postal S; Steakley J; Waddey P
    Front Health Serv Manage; 1999; 16(2):3-38. PubMed ID: 10787844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethical procedures and patient consent differ in Europe.
    Stamer UM; Naef N; Porz R; Stuber F; Leva B; Meissner W; Fletcher D;
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Feb; 32(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 25503525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality consciousness...auditing for HIPAA Privacy Compliance.
    LePar K
    J Nurs Care Qual; 2004; 19(2):105-13; quiz 114-5. PubMed ID: 15077827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterization of Factors Predicting a Favorable Opinion of Research Applications Submitted for an Ethical Review Process.
    Mirpuri E; García-Álvarez L; Acín-Gericó MT; Bartolomé B; Delgado Bolton RC; San-Martín M; Vivanco L
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2022; 9():878786. PubMed ID: 35783641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethical review: Standardizing procedures and local shaping of ethical review practices.
    Jaspers P; Houtepen R; Horstman K
    Soc Sci Med; 2013 Dec; 98():311-8. PubMed ID: 23921211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is auditor financial decision-making affected by prior audit report information? A behavioral approach.
    Muñoz-Izquierdo N; Camacho-Miñano MD; Sánchez-Martín MD; Pascual-Ezama D
    Heliyon; 2024 May; 10(10):e30971. PubMed ID: 38803947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ethical consideration of the research proposal and the informed-consent process: An online survey of researchers and ethics committee members in Thailand.
    Kaewkungwal J; Adams P
    Account Res; 2019 Apr; 26(3):176-197. PubMed ID: 30987450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An Evaluation of the Middle East Research Training Initiative Tool in Assessing Effective Functioning of Research Ethics Committees.
    Jaoko W; Bukusi E; Davis AM
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Oct; 11(4):357-363. PubMed ID: 27580742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditing of clinical research ethics in a children's and women's academic hospital.
    Bortolussi R; Nicholson D
    Clin Invest Med; 2002 Jun; 25(3):83-8. PubMed ID: 12137256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Familiar ethical issues amplified: how members of research ethics committees describe ethical distinctions between disaster and non-disaster research.
    Tansey CM; Anderson J; Boulanger RF; Eckenwiler L; Pringle J; Schwartz L; Hunt M
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Jun; 18(1):44. PubMed ID: 28659166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ethics is everybody's business, especially in regard to confidentiality.
    Fletcher JC
    J Clin Ethics; 1991; 2(1):30-1. PubMed ID: 11642911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A 12-year audit of IRB decisions.
    Grodin MA; Zaharoff BE; Kaminow PV
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1986 Mar; 12(3):82-6. PubMed ID: 3085041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acceptability and profile of the clinical drug trials underway in Finnish university hospitals in the 1990s: applications reviewed by ethics committees.
    Keinonen T; Nieminen S; Saareks V; Saano V; Ylitalo P
    Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol; 2001 Sep; 23(7):415-23. PubMed ID: 11771857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating ethics committees: a view from the outside.
    Hoffmann DE
    Milbank Q; 1993; 71(4):677-701. PubMed ID: 8246852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of clinical trials by Ethics Committees in Germany: experience of applicants with the review of requests for opinion of the Ethics Committees - results of a survey among members of the German Association of Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies (VFA).
    Russ H; Busta S; Riedel A; Zöllner G; Jost B
    Ger Med Sci; 2009 Jul; 7():Doc07. PubMed ID: 19675747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consent requirements for research with human tissue: Swiss ethics committee members disagree.
    Colledge F; De Massougnes S; Elger B
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Nov; 19(1):93. PubMed ID: 30477493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.