These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23436139)

  • 1. The effects of variant descriptors on the potential effectiveness of plain packaging.
    Borland R; Savvas S
    Tob Control; 2014 Jan; 23(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 23436139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of stick design features on perceptions of characteristics of cigarettes.
    Borland R; Savvas S
    Tob Control; 2013 Sep; 22(5):331-7. PubMed ID: 22396209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of structural packaging design on young adult smokers' perceptions of tobacco products.
    Borland R; Savvas S; Sharkie F; Moore K
    Tob Control; 2013 Mar; 22(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 22166265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consumer perceptions of cigarette pack design in France: a comparison of regular, limited edition and plain packaging.
    Gallopel-Morvan K; Moodie C; Hammond D; Eker F; Beguinot E; Martinet Y
    Tob Control; 2012 Sep; 21(5):502-6. PubMed ID: 21998127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. US Smokers' Beliefs, Experiences and Perceptions of Different Cigarette Variants Before and After the FSPTCA Ban on Misleading Descriptors Such as "Light," "Mild," or "Low".
    Yong HH; Borland R; Cummings KM; Lindblom EN; Li L; Bansal-Travers M; O'Connor RJ; Elton-Marshall T; Thrasher JF; Hammond D; Thompson ME; Partos TR
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2016 Nov; 18(11):2115-2123. PubMed ID: 27083215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of brand variants on smokers' choice behaviours and risk perceptions.
    Hoek J; Gendall P; Eckert C; Kemper J; Louviere J
    Tob Control; 2016 Mar; 25(2):160-5. PubMed ID: 25808667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cigarette design and marketing features are associated with increased smoking susceptibility and perception of reduced harm among smokers in 27 EU countries.
    Agaku IT; Omaduvie UT; Filippidis FT; Vardavas CI
    Tob Control; 2015 Dec; 24(e4):e233-40. PubMed ID: 25335899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deadly in pink: the impact of cigarette packaging among young women.
    Doxey J; Hammond D
    Tob Control; 2011 Sep; 20(5):353-60. PubMed ID: 21478476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How does increasingly plainer cigarette packaging influence adult smokers' perceptions about brand image? An experimental study.
    Wakefield MA; Germain D; Durkin SJ
    Tob Control; 2008 Dec; 17(6):416-21. PubMed ID: 18827035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of health-oriented descriptors on combustible cigarette and electronic cigarette packaging: an experiment among adult smokers in the United States.
    Sanders-Jackson A; Tan ASL; Yie K
    Tob Control; 2018 Sep; 27(5):534-541. PubMed ID: 28983071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptions of plain packaging among young adult roll-your-own smokers in France: a naturalistic approach.
    Gallopel-Morvan K; Moodie C; Eker F; Beguinot E; Martinet Y
    Tob Control; 2015 Mar; 24(e1):e39-44. PubMed ID: 24920573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of cigarette branding and plain packaging on female youth in the United Kingdom.
    Hammond D; Daniel S; White CM
    J Adolesc Health; 2013 Feb; 52(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 23332478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Survey of descriptors on cigarette packs: still misleading consumers?
    Peace J; Wilson N; Hoek J; Edwards R; Thomson G
    N Z Med J; 2009 Sep; 122(1303):90-6. PubMed ID: 19851423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adolescent perceptions of dissuasive sticks: a web survey among 16-20 year olds in Norway.
    Lund I; Scheffels J
    BMC Public Health; 2018 Aug; 18(1):974. PubMed ID: 30081848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of premium versus value brand names on the smoking experience in a plain packaging environment: an experimental study.
    Skaczkowski G; Durkin S; Kashima Y; Wakefield M
    BMJ Open; 2017 Jan; 7(1):e014099. PubMed ID: 28093441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adolescents' perceptions of cigarette brand image: does plain packaging make a difference?
    Germain D; Wakefield MA; Durkin SJ
    J Adolesc Health; 2010 Apr; 46(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 20307829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Young adult smokers' perceptions of plain packaging: a pilot naturalistic study.
    Moodie C; Mackintosh AM; Hastings G; Ford A
    Tob Control; 2011 Sep; 20(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 21752795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cigarette packaging: Youth perceptions of "natural" cigarettes, filter references, and contraband tobacco.
    Czoli CD; Hammond D
    J Adolesc Health; 2014 Jan; 54(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 24012064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of female-oriented cigarette packaging in the United States.
    Hammond D; Doxey J; Daniel S; Bansal-Travers M
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2011 Jul; 13(7):579-88. PubMed ID: 21486994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is consumer response to plain/standardised tobacco packaging consistent with framework convention on tobacco control guidelines? A systematic review of quantitative studies.
    Stead M; Moodie C; Angus K; Bauld L; McNeill A; Thomas J; Hastings G; Hinds K; O'Mara-Eves A; Kwan I; Purves RI; Bryce SL
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e75919. PubMed ID: 24146791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.