These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23436139)

  • 21. Impact of female-oriented cigarette packaging in the United States.
    Hammond D; Doxey J; Daniel S; Bansal-Travers M
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2011 Jul; 13(7):579-88. PubMed ID: 21486994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The impact of cigarette pack shape, size and opening: evidence from tobacco company documents.
    Kotnowski K; Hammond D
    Addiction; 2013 Sep; 108(9):1658-68. PubMed ID: 23600674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Is consumer response to plain/standardised tobacco packaging consistent with framework convention on tobacco control guidelines? A systematic review of quantitative studies.
    Stead M; Moodie C; Angus K; Bauld L; McNeill A; Thomas J; Hastings G; Hinds K; O'Mara-Eves A; Kwan I; Purves RI; Bryce SL
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e75919. PubMed ID: 24146791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cigarette pack design and perceptions of risk among UK adults and youth.
    Hammond D; Dockrell M; Arnott D; Lee A; McNeill A
    Eur J Public Health; 2009 Dec; 19(6):631-7. PubMed ID: 19726589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Do larger pictorial health warnings diminish the need for plain packaging of cigarettes?
    Wakefield M; Germain D; Durkin S; Hammond D; Goldberg M; Borland R
    Addiction; 2012 Jun; 107(6):1159-67. PubMed ID: 22372966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of cigarillo packaging elements on young adult perceptions of product flavor, taste, smell, and appeal.
    Meernik C; Ranney LM; Lazard AJ; Kim K; Queen TL; Avishai A; Boynton MH; Sheeran PJ; Goldstein AO
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0196236. PubMed ID: 29672604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of dissuasive packaging on young adult smokers.
    Hoek J; Wong C; Gendall P; Louviere J; Cong K
    Tob Control; 2011 May; 20(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 20966135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impact of smokeless tobacco packaging on perceptions and beliefs among youth, young adults, and adults in the U.S: findings from an internet-based cross-sectional survey.
    Adkison SE; Bansal-Travers M; Smith DM; O'Connor RJ; Hyland AJ
    Harm Reduct J; 2014 Jan; 11():2. PubMed ID: 24433301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Young adult smokers' perceptions of plain packs, numbered packs and pack inserts in Turkey: a focus group study.
    Mucan B; Moodie C
    Tob Control; 2018 Nov; 27(6):631-636. PubMed ID: 29123023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The impact of cigarette pack design, descriptors, and warning labels on risk perception in the U.S.
    Bansal-Travers M; Hammond D; Smith P; Cummings KM
    Am J Prev Med; 2011 Jun; 40(6):674-82. PubMed ID: 21565661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effectiveness of text versus pictorial health warning labels and predictors of support for plain packaging of tobacco products within the European Union.
    Agaku IT; Filippidis FT; Vardavas CI
    Eur Addict Res; 2015; 21(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 25402440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Graphic warning labels on plain cigarette packs: will they make a difference to adolescents?
    McCool J; Webb L; Cameron LD; Hoek J
    Soc Sci Med; 2012 Apr; 74(8):1269-73. PubMed ID: 22385817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of first exposure to plain cigarette packaging on smoking behaviour and attitudes: a randomised controlled study.
    Maynard OM; Leonards U; Attwood AS; Bauld L; Hogarth L; Munafò MR
    BMC Public Health; 2015 Mar; 15():240. PubMed ID: 25880278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of premium vs masked cigarette brand names on the experienced taste of a cigarette after tobacco plain packaging in Australia: an experimental study.
    Skaczkowski G; Durkin S; Kashima Y; Wakefield M
    BMC Public Health; 2018 Mar; 18(1):295. PubMed ID: 29526164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cigarette brand variant portfolio strategy and the use of colour in a darkening market.
    Greenland SJ
    Tob Control; 2015 Mar; 24(e1):e65-71. PubMed ID: 23988859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perceptions of plain packaging and health warning labels for cannabis among young adults: findings from an experimental study.
    Mutti-Packer S; Collyer B; Hodgins DC
    BMC Public Health; 2018 Dec; 18(1):1361. PubMed ID: 30526539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cigarette pack labelling in 12 countries at different levels of economic development.
    Mir H; Buchanan D; Gilmore A; McKee M; Yusuf S; Chow CK
    J Public Health Policy; 2011 May; 32(2):146-64. PubMed ID: 21368847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Smokers' reactions to the new larger health warning labels on plain cigarette packs in Australia: findings from the ITC Australia project.
    Yong HH; Borland R; Hammond D; Thrasher JF; Cummings KM; Fong GT
    Tob Control; 2016 Mar; 25(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 25700365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Young smokers and non-smokers perceptions of typical users of plain vs. branded cigarette packs: a between-subjects experimental survey.
    Lund I; Scheffels J
    BMC Public Health; 2013 Oct; 13():1005. PubMed ID: 24156515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Can Removing Tar Information From Cigarette Packages Reduce Smokers' Misconceptions About Low-Tar Cigarettes? An Experiment From One of the World's Lowest Tar Yield Markets, South Korea.
    Paek HJ; Dewhirst T; Hove T
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2020 May; 22(6):990-996. PubMed ID: 30726984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.