These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23436786)

  • 21. Distinct prioritization of visual working memory representations for search and for recall.
    Dube B; Al-Aidroos N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1253-1261. PubMed ID: 30644056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Not all information in visual working memory is forgotten equally.
    Moen KC; Guevara Pinto JD; Papesh MH; Beck MR
    Conscious Cogn; 2019 Sep; 74():102782. PubMed ID: 31336214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Refreshing memory traces: thinking of an item improves retrieval from visual working memory.
    Souza AS; Rerko L; Oberauer K
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():20-31. PubMed ID: 25557544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Orienting Attention to Auditory and Visual Short-term Memory: The Roles of Age, Hearing Loss, and Cognitive Status.
    Garami L; Chow R; Fakuade A; Swaminathan S; Alain C
    Exp Aging Res; 2020; 46(1):22-38. PubMed ID: 31750789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Forget Me if You Can: Attentional capture by to-Be-remembered and to-Be-forgotten visual stimuli.
    Sasin E; Morey CC; Nieuwenstein M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Oct; 24(5):1643-1650. PubMed ID: 28074450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Neural Consequences of Attentional Prioritization of Internal Representations in Visual Working Memory.
    Sahan MI; Sheldon AD; Postle BR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 May; 32(5):917-944. PubMed ID: 31851592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Distributing versus focusing attention in visual short-term memory.
    Makovsik T; Jiang YV
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Dec; 14(6):1072-8. PubMed ID: 18229477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. On the fate of non-cued mental representations in visuo-spatial working memory: Evidence by a retro-cuing paradigm.
    Schneider D; Mertes C; Wascher E
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 293():114-24. PubMed ID: 26196953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Visual Short-Term Memory Activity in Parietal Lobe Reflects Cognitive Processes beyond Attentional Selection.
    Sheremata SL; Somers DC; Shomstein S
    J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 38(6):1511-1519. PubMed ID: 29311140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The separable effects of feature precision and item load in visual short-term memory.
    Lilburn SD; Smith PL; Sewell DK
    J Vis; 2019 Jan; 19(1):2. PubMed ID: 30630190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance.
    van Moorselaar D; Battistoni E; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():1-10. PubMed ID: 25428708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Orienting attention within visual short-term memory: development and mechanisms.
    Shimi A; Nobre AC; Astle D; Scerif G
    Child Dev; 2014; 85(2):578-92. PubMed ID: 23937596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Neural mechanisms by which attention modulates the comparison of remembered and perceptual representations.
    Kuo BC; Astle DE
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e86666. PubMed ID: 24466193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory.
    Dube B; Lumsden A; Al-Aidroos N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):641-646. PubMed ID: 30276638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of visual short-term memory load and attentional demand on the contrast response function.
    Konstantinou N; Lavie N
    J Vis; 2020 Oct; 20(10):6. PubMed ID: 33007080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Selective maintenance in visual working memory does not require sustained visual attention.
    Hollingworth A; Maxcey-Richard AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):1047-58. PubMed ID: 23067118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Temporal-contextual processing in working memory: evidence from delayed cued recall and delayed free recall tests.
    Loaiza VM; McCabe DP
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Feb; 40(2):191-203. PubMed ID: 21948350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Retro-Cue Benefit for Verbal Material and Its Influence on the Probability of Intrusions Under Dual-Task Conditions.
    Krefeld-Schwalb A
    Exp Psychol; 2018 May; 65(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 29905113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Splitting attention across the two visual fields in visual short-term memory.
    Delvenne JF; Holt JL
    Cognition; 2012 Feb; 122(2):258-63. PubMed ID: 22113121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The development of retro-cue benefits with extensive practice: Implications for capacity estimation and attentional states in visual working memory.
    Zerr P; Gayet S; van den Esschert F; Kappen M; Olah Z; Van der Stigchel S
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jul; 49(5):1036-1049. PubMed ID: 33616865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.