289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23436858)
1. Vascular diameter measurement in CT angiography: comparison of model-based iterative reconstruction and standard filtered back projection algorithms in vitro.
Suzuki S; Machida H; Tanaka I; Ueno E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):652-7. PubMed ID: 23436858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement of vascular wall attenuation: comparison of CT angiography using model-based iterative reconstruction with standard filtered back-projection algorithm CT in vitro.
Suzuki S; Machida H; Tanaka I; Ueno E
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3348-53. PubMed ID: 22436433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diameter measurement of vascular model on CT angiography using model-based iterative reconstruction: effect of tube current on accuracy.
Suzuki S; Machida H; Tanaka I; Fukui R; Ueno E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Feb; 202(2):437-42. PubMed ID: 24450689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study.
Deák Z; Grimm JM; Treitl M; Geyer LL; Linsenmaier U; Körner M; Reiser MF; Wirth S
Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 23169793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Submillisievert chest CT with filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction techniques.
Padole A; Singh S; Ackman JB; Wu C; Do S; Pourjabbar S; Khawaja RD; Otrakji A; Digumarthy S; Shepard JA; Kalra M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):772-81. PubMed ID: 25247943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm for measurement of vascular diameter on computed tomographic angiography in vitro.
Suzuki S; Nishiyama Y; Kuwahara S; Hikosaka S; Monma K; Odagiri H
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 23493226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.
Singh S; Kalra MK; Do S; Thibault JB; Pien H; O'Connor OJ; Blake MA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 22592622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Precision and accuracy in CT attenuation measurement of vascular wall using region-of-interest supported by differentiation curve.
Suzuki S; Kidouchi T; Kuwahara S; Vembar M; Takei R; Yamamoto A
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):757-61. PubMed ID: 21300506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms.
Richard S; Husarik DB; Yadava G; Murphy SN; Samei E
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4115-22. PubMed ID: 22830744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CT Dose Reduction for Visceral Adipose Tissue Measurement: Effects of Model-Based and Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstructions and Filtered Back Projection.
Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Niijima Y; Hashimoto M; Yamada M; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):W677-83. PubMed ID: 26001256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography.
Chang W; Lee JM; Lee K; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Han JK; Choi BI
Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):598-606. PubMed ID: 23511193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CT of the chest with model-based, fully iterative reconstruction: comparison with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
Ichikawa Y; Kitagawa K; Nagasawa N; Murashima S; Sakuma H
BMC Med Imaging; 2013 Aug; 13():27. PubMed ID: 23927627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Image comparative assessment using iterative reconstructions: clinical comparison of low-dose abdominal/pelvic computed tomography between adaptive statistical, model-based iterative reconstructions and traditional filtered back projection in 65 patients.
Vardhanabhuti V; Riordan RD; Mitchell GR; Hyde C; Roobottom CA
Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):209-16. PubMed ID: 24368613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultra-low-dose CT of the lung: effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality.
Yanagawa M; Gyobu T; Leung AN; Kawai M; Kawata Y; Sumikawa H; Honda O; Tomiyama N
Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):695-703. PubMed ID: 24713541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of pure and hybrid iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: image quality assessment in the cervicothoracic region.
Katsura M; Sato J; Akahane M; Matsuda I; Ishida M; Yasaka K; Kunimatsu A; Ohtomo K
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Feb; 82(2):356-60. PubMed ID: 23199752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correction of photon attenuation and collimator response for a body-contouring SPECT/CT imaging system.
Seo Y; Wong KH; Sun M; Franc BL; Hawkins RA; Hasegawa BH
J Nucl Med; 2005 May; 46(5):868-77. PubMed ID: 15872362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of the CT Parameters to Suppress Renal Cysts Pseudoenhancement Effect: Influence of the Virtual Monochromatic Spectral Images, the Model-based Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm and the Aperture Size in Phantom Model].
Sugisawa K; Ichikawa K; Minamishima K; Hasegawa M; Yamada Y; Jinzaki M
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2017; 73(8):636-645. PubMed ID: 28824087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Model-based iterative reconstruction for improvement of low-contrast detectability in liver CT at reduced radiation dose: ex-vivo experience.
Husarik DB; Alkadhi H; Puippe GD; Reiner CS; Chuck NC; Morsbach F; Szucs-Farkas Z; Schindera ST
Clin Radiol; 2015 Apr; 70(4):366-72. PubMed ID: 25554541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of automated CT angiography measurement of vascular diameter in phantoms: effect of size of display field of view, density of contrast medium, and wall thickness.
Suzuki S; Furui S; Kaminaga T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jun; 184(6):1940-4. PubMed ID: 15908558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction (MBIR) for the Reduction of Metal Artifacts on CT.
Boudabbous S; Arditi D; Paulin E; Syrogiannopoulou A; Becker C; Montet X
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Aug; 205(2):380-5. PubMed ID: 26204291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
