These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23436912)
1. CodonPhyML: fast maximum likelihood phylogeny estimation under codon substitution models. Gil M; Zanetti MS; Zoller S; Anisimova M Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Jun; 30(6):1270-80. PubMed ID: 23436912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The genetic code can cause systematic bias in simple phylogenetic models. Whelan S Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2008 Dec; 363(1512):4003-11. PubMed ID: 18852102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An empirical examination of the utility of codon-substitution models in phylogeny reconstruction. Ren F; Tanaka H; Yang Z Syst Biol; 2005 Oct; 54(5):808-18. PubMed ID: 16243764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. SynPAM-a distance measure based on synonymous codon substitutions. Schneider A; Gonnet G; Cannarozzi G IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2007; 4(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 17975267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bayesian coestimation of phylogeny and sequence alignment. Lunter G; Miklós I; Drummond A; Jensen JL; Hein J BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():83. PubMed ID: 15804354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Codon substitution models based on residue similarity and their applications. Liu X; Liu H; Guo W; Yu K Gene; 2012 Nov; 509(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 22902303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Choosing appropriate substitution models for the phylogenetic analysis of protein-coding sequences. Shapiro B; Rambaut A; Drummond AJ Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Jan; 23(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 16177232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relating physicochemical properties of amino acids to variable nucleotide substitution patterns among sites. Yang Z Pac Symp Biocomput; 2000; ():81-92. PubMed ID: 10902158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. Goldman N; Yang Z Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Sep; 11(5):725-36. PubMed ID: 7968486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detecting the signatures of adaptive evolution in protein-coding genes. Bielawski JP Curr Protoc Mol Biol; 2013 Jan; Chapter 19():Unit 19.1.. PubMed ID: 23288462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An empirical assessment of long-branch attraction artefacts in deep eukaryotic phylogenomics. Brinkmann H; van der Giezen M; Zhou Y; Poncelin de Raucourt G; Philippe H Syst Biol; 2005 Oct; 54(5):743-57. PubMed ID: 16243762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Phylogenetic inference with weighted codon evolutionary distances. Criscuolo A; Michel CJ J Mol Evol; 2009 Apr; 68(4):377-92. PubMed ID: 19308635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating the robustness of phylogenetic methods to among-site variability in substitution processes. Holder MT; Zwickl DJ; Dessimoz C Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2008 Dec; 363(1512):4013-21. PubMed ID: 18852108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Maximum-Likelihood Tree Estimation Using Codon Substitution Models with Multiple Partitions. Zoller S; Boskova V; Anisimova M Mol Biol Evol; 2015 Aug; 32(8):2208-16. PubMed ID: 25911229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. DNA Sequences Are as Useful as Protein Sequences for Inferring Deep Phylogenies. Kapli P; Kotari I; Telford MJ; Goldman N; Yang Z Syst Biol; 2023 Nov; 72(5):1119-1135. PubMed ID: 37366056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]