These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2343740)

  • 21. Prediction of amalgam restoration longevity.
    Smales RJ; Webster DA; Leppard PI; Dawson AS
    J Dent; 1991 Feb; 19(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 2016424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Survival of ART and amalgam restorations in permanent teeth of children after 6.3 years.
    Frencken JE; Taifour D; van 't Hof MA
    J Dent Res; 2006 Jul; 85(7):622-6. PubMed ID: 16798862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis.
    Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An evaluation of replacement rates for posterior resin-based composite and amalgam restorations in U.S. Navy and marine corps recruits.
    Simecek JW; Diefenderfer KE; Cohen ME
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb; 140(2):200-9; quiz 249. PubMed ID: 19188417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Multilevel survival analysis of amalgam restorations amongst RAF personnel.
    Gilthorpe MS; Mayhew MT; Bulman JS
    Community Dent Health; 2002 Mar; 19(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 11922409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Survival predictions of amalgam restorations.
    Smales RJ; Webster DA; Leppard PI
    J Dent; 1991 Oct; 19(5):272-7. PubMed ID: 1806592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Long-term survival of extensive amalgams and posterior crowns.
    Smales RJ; Hawthorne WS
    J Dent; 1997; 25(3-4):225-7. PubMed ID: 9175349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Study regarding coronal fracture probability in posterior amalgam restorations].
    Andrian S; Iovan G; Oncea C; Teodorovici P; Hasna M
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2006; 110(3):692-7. PubMed ID: 17571568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. No evidence that bonding is needed for amalgam restorations.
    Keenan JR; Veitz-Keenan A
    Evid Based Dent; 2017 Jun; 18(2):45. PubMed ID: 28642569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Teeth with large amalgam restorations and crowns: factors affecting the receipt of subsequent treatment after 10 years.
    Kolker JL; Damiano PC; Caplan DJ; Armstrong SR; Dawson DV; Jones MP; Flach SD; Warren JJ; Kuthy RA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Jun; 136(6):738-48; quiz 805-6. PubMed ID: 16022038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. 12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Loomans BA; Huysmans MC
    J Dent Res; 2010 Oct; 89(10):1063-7. PubMed ID: 20660797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of restorative material on the survival rate of restorations in primary molars.
    Papathanasiou AG; Curzon ME; Fairpo CG
    Pediatr Dent; 1994; 16(4):282-8. PubMed ID: 7937261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Long-term clinical evaluation of fracture and pulp injury following glass-ionomer cement or composite resin applied as a base filling in teeth restored with amalgam.
    De C Luz MA; Ciaramicoli-Rodrigues MT; Garone Netto N; De Lima AC
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Jul; 28(7):634-9. PubMed ID: 11422695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Titanium posts and bonded amalgam core longevity: A 22-year clinical survival retrospective study.
    Caserío Valea M; Alonso de la Peña V
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Feb; 148(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 27863694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Amalgam or composite resin? Factors influencing the choice of restorative material.
    Correa MB; Peres MA; Peres KG; Horta BL; Barros AD; Demarco FF
    J Dent; 2012 Sep; 40(9):703-10. PubMed ID: 22546263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Longevity of conventional and bonded (sealed) amalgam restorations in a private general dental practice.
    Bonsor SJ; Chadwick RG
    Br Dent J; 2009 Jan; 206(2):E3; discussion 88-9. PubMed ID: 19148188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Survival analysis of complete veneer crowns vs. multisurface restorations: a dental school patient population.
    Janus CE; Unger JW; Best AM
    J Dent Educ; 2006 Oct; 70(10):1098-104. PubMed ID: 17021290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The longevity of resin-based composite restorations in posterior teeth.
    Hondrum SO
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(4):398-404. PubMed ID: 11199613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure.
    Hickel R; Manhart J
    J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(1):45-64. PubMed ID: 11317384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Amalgam type, adhesive system, and storage period as influencing factors on microleakage of amalgam restorations.
    Ziskind D; Venezia E; Kreisman I; Mass E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Sep; 90(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 12942059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.