These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23437633)

  • 1. Overcoming hurdles in translating visual search research between the lab and the field.
    Clark K; Cain MS; Adamo SH; Mitroff SR
    Nebr Symp Motiv; 2012; 59():147-81. PubMed ID: 23437633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Context matters: the structure of task goals affects accuracy in multiple-target visual search.
    Clark K; Cain MS; Adcock RA; Mitroff SR
    Appl Ergon; 2014 May; 45(3):528-33. PubMed ID: 23957930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When do I quit? The search termination problem in visual search.
    Wolfe JM
    Nebr Symp Motiv; 2012; 59():183-208. PubMed ID: 23437634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A little bit of history repeating: Splitting up multiple-target visual searches decreases second-target miss errors.
    Cain MS; Biggs AT; Darling EF; Mitroff SR
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2014 Jun; 20(2):112-25. PubMed ID: 24708353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Examining perceptual and conceptual set biases in multiple-target visual search.
    Biggs AT; Adamo SH; Dowd EW; Mitroff SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):844-55. PubMed ID: 25678271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting Airport Screening Officers' Visual Search Competency With a Rapid Assessment.
    Mitroff SR; Ericson JM; Sharpe B
    Hum Factors; 2018 Mar; 60(2):201-211. PubMed ID: 29193997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Different predictors of multiple-target search accuracy between nonprofessional and professional visual searchers.
    Biggs AT; Mitroff SR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(7):1335-48. PubMed ID: 24266390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Generalized "satisfaction of search": adverse influences on dual-target search accuracy.
    Fleck MS; Samei E; Mitroff SR
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Mar; 16(1):60-71. PubMed ID: 20350044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Great expectations: minor differences in initial instructions have a major impact on visual search in the absence of feedback.
    Cox PH; Kravitz DJ; Mitroff SR
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Mar; 6(1):19. PubMed ID: 33740159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anticipatory anxiety hinders detection of a second target in dual-target search.
    Cain MS; Dunsmoor JE; LaBar KS; Mitroff SR
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Jul; 22(7):866-71. PubMed ID: 21670427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prevalence effects in newly trained airport checkpoint screeners: trained observers miss rare targets, too.
    Wolfe JM; Brunelli DN; Rubinstein J; Horowitz TS
    J Vis; 2013 Dec; 13(3):33. PubMed ID: 24297778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The developmental origins of naïve psychology in infancy.
    Poulin-Dubois D; Brooker I; Chow V
    Adv Child Dev Behav; 2009; 37():55-104. PubMed ID: 19673160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences in multiple-target visual search performance between non-professional and professional searchers due to decision-making criteria.
    Biggs AT; Mitroff SR
    Br J Psychol; 2015 Nov; 106(4):551-63. PubMed ID: 25266971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Specific-token effects in screening tasks: possible implications for aviation security.
    Smith JD; Redford JS; Washburn DA; Taglialatela LA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1171-85. PubMed ID: 16393038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual search behavior and performance in luggage screening: effects of time pressure, automation aid, and target expectancy.
    Rieger T; Heilmann L; Manzey D
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Feb; 6(1):12. PubMed ID: 33630179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Airport Security Screener Problem-Solving Knowledge and Implications.
    Swann L; Popovic V; Blackler A; Thompson H
    Hum Factors; 2020 Dec; 62(8):1265-1285. PubMed ID: 31557055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual Perception: How Better Imaging Can Make Things Worse.
    Wolfe JM
    Curr Biol; 2021 Mar; 31(5):R246-R248. PubMed ID: 33689722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A bayesian optimal foraging model of human visual search.
    Cain MS; Vul E; Clark K; Mitroff SR
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Sep; 23(9):1047-54. PubMed ID: 22868494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nature of expertise in searching mammograms for breast masses.
    Nodine CF; Kundel HL; Lauver SC; Toto LC
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Dec; 3(12):1000-6. PubMed ID: 9017014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The ultra-rare-item effect: visual search for exceedingly rare items is highly susceptible to error.
    Mitroff SR; Biggs AT
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Jan; 25(1):284-9. PubMed ID: 24270463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.