These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23437634)
1. When do I quit? The search termination problem in visual search. Wolfe JM Nebr Symp Motiv; 2012; 59():183-208. PubMed ID: 23437634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Overcoming hurdles in translating visual search research between the lab and the field. Clark K; Cain MS; Adamo SH; Mitroff SR Nebr Symp Motiv; 2012; 59():147-81. PubMed ID: 23437633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. When is it time to move to the next map? Optimal foraging in guided visual search. Ehinger KA; Wolfe JM Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2135-51. PubMed ID: 27192994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks. Wolfe JM; Horowitz TS; Van Wert MJ; Kenner NM; Place SS; Kibbi N J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Nov; 136(4):623-38. PubMed ID: 17999575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual Perception: How Better Imaging Can Make Things Worse. Wolfe JM Curr Biol; 2021 Mar; 31(5):R246-R248. PubMed ID: 33689722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting Airport Screening Officers' Visual Search Competency With a Rapid Assessment. Mitroff SR; Ericson JM; Sharpe B Hum Factors; 2018 Mar; 60(2):201-211. PubMed ID: 29193997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection measures for visual inspection of X-ray images of passenger baggage. Sterchi Y; Hättenschwiler N; Schwaninger A Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1297-1311. PubMed ID: 30684203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of local prevalence and explicit expectations on search termination times. Ishibashi K; Kita S; Wolfe JM Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jan; 74(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 22006528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Visual search behavior and performance in luggage screening: effects of time pressure, automation aid, and target expectancy. Rieger T; Heilmann L; Manzey D Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Feb; 6(1):12. PubMed ID: 33630179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Even in correctable search, some types of rare targets are frequently missed. Van Wert MJ; Horowitz TS; Wolfe JM Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):541-53. PubMed ID: 19304645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A diffusion model analysis of target detection in near-threshold visual search. Corbett EA; Smith PL Cogn Psychol; 2020 Aug; 120():101289. PubMed ID: 32203747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Serial vs. parallel models of attention in visual search: accounting for benchmark RT-distributions. Moran R; Zehetleitner M; Liesefeld HR; Müller HJ; Usher M Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1300-1315. PubMed ID: 26635097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Face detection differs from categorization: evidence from visual search in natural scenes. Bindemann M; Lewis MB Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Dec; 20(6):1140-5. PubMed ID: 23645414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual Search: How Do We Find What We Are Looking For? Wolfe JM Annu Rev Vis Sci; 2020 Sep; 6():539-562. PubMed ID: 32320631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perceptual training for visual search. Schuster D; Rivera J; Sellers BC; Fiore SM; Jentsch F Ergonomics; 2013; 56(7):1101-15. PubMed ID: 23650877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]