These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23437634)

  • 21. The attentional template in high and low similarity search: Optimal tuning or tuning to relations?
    Hamblin-Frohman Z; Becker SI
    Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104732. PubMed ID: 33862440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Visual search for rare targets: distracter tuning as a mechanism for learning from repeated target-absent searches.
    Levin DT; Angelone BL; Beck MR
    Br J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 102(3):313-27. PubMed ID: 21751991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Visual search errors are persistent in a laboratory analog of the incidental finding problem.
    Nartker MS; Alaoui-Soce A; Wolfe JM
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Jul; 5(1):32. PubMed ID: 32728864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Visual search in scenes involves selective and nonselective pathways.
    Wolfe JM; Võ ML; Evans KK; Greene MR
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2011 Feb; 15(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 21227734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Context matters: the structure of task goals affects accuracy in multiple-target visual search.
    Clark K; Cain MS; Adcock RA; Mitroff SR
    Appl Ergon; 2014 May; 45(3):528-33. PubMed ID: 23957930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Age, target-distractor similarity, and visual search.
    Scialfa CT; Esau SP; Joffe KM
    Exp Aging Res; 1998; 24(4):337-58. PubMed ID: 9783154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A little bit of history repeating: Splitting up multiple-target visual searches decreases second-target miss errors.
    Cain MS; Biggs AT; Darling EF; Mitroff SR
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2014 Jun; 20(2):112-25. PubMed ID: 24708353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Visual skills in airport-security screening.
    McCarley JS; Kramer AF; Wickens CD; Vidoni ED; Boot WR
    Psychol Sci; 2004 May; 15(5):302-6. PubMed ID: 15102138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The target effect: visual memory for unnamed search targets.
    Thomas MD; Williams CC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2090-104. PubMed ID: 24684498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Hybrid foraging search in younger and older age.
    Wiegand I; Seidel C; Wolfe J
    Psychol Aging; 2019 Sep; 34(6):805-820. PubMed ID: 31414857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The impact of Relative Prevalence on dual-target search for threat items from airport X-ray screening.
    Godwin HJ; Menneer T; Cave KR; Helman S; Way RL; Donnelly N
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 20129597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Time Course of Target Template Activation Processes during Preparation for Visual Search.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(44):9527-9538. PubMed ID: 30242053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Looking ahead: When do you find the next item in foraging visual search?
    Kosovicheva A; Alaoui-Soce A; Wolfe JM
    J Vis; 2020 Feb; 20(2):3. PubMed ID: 32040162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Great expectations: minor differences in initial instructions have a major impact on visual search in the absence of feedback.
    Cox PH; Kravitz DJ; Mitroff SR
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Mar; 6(1):19. PubMed ID: 33740159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perceptual information and attentional constraints in visual search of collision events.
    Andersen GJ; Kim RD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Oct; 27(5):1039-56. PubMed ID: 11642694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The cost of search for multiple targets: effects of practice and target similarity.
    Menneer T; Cave KR; Donnelly N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Jun; 15(2):125-39. PubMed ID: 19586251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Missed targets are more frequent than false alarms: a model for error rates in visual search.
    Zenger B; Fahle M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Dec; 23(6):1783-91. PubMed ID: 9425680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Specific-token effects in screening tasks: possible implications for aviation security.
    Smith JD; Redford JS; Washburn DA; Taglialatela LA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1171-85. PubMed ID: 16393038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Different predictors of multiple-target search accuracy between nonprofessional and professional visual searchers.
    Biggs AT; Mitroff SR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(7):1335-48. PubMed ID: 24266390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Competitive guided search: meeting the challenge of benchmark RT distributions.
    Moran R; Zehetleitner M; Müller HJ; Usher M
    J Vis; 2013 Jul; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 23887047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.