These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2343769)

  • 1. Processing dominance of global and local information in visual patterns.
    Luna D; Merino JM; Marcos-Ruiz R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1990 Mar; 73(2):131-43. PubMed ID: 2343769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do response time advantage and interference reflect the order of processing of global- and local-level information?
    Lamb MR; Robertson LC
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Sep; 46(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 2771617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What does the nature of the stimuli tell us about the Global Precedence Effect?
    Poirel N; Pineau A; Mellet E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 17240344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hemispheric local/global processing revisited.
    Polich J; Aguilar V
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1990 Jun; 74(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 2392956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Low-frequency filtering and the processing of local-global stimuli.
    Badcock JC; Whitworth FA; Badcock DR; Lovegrove WJ
    Perception; 1990; 19(5):617-29. PubMed ID: 2102996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of visual angle on global and local reaction times depends on the set of visual angles presented.
    Lamb MR; Robertson LC
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 May; 47(5):489-96. PubMed ID: 2349061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attentional zooming and the global-dominance phenomenon: effects of level-specific cueing and abrupt visual onset.
    Stoffer TH
    Psychol Res; 1994; 56(2):83-98. PubMed ID: 8153247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli by normal subjects: new data and a meta-analysis of previous studies.
    Van Kleeck MH
    Neuropsychologia; 1989; 27(9):1165-78. PubMed ID: 2812299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of good form and spatial frequency on global precedence.
    LaGasse LL
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Jan; 53(1):89-105. PubMed ID: 8433909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Global versus local processing: is there a hemispheric dichotomy?
    Boles DB
    Neuropsychologia; 1984; 22(4):445-55. PubMed ID: 6483171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of the similarity between target and global and local levels in hierarchical stimuli processing.
    Blanca MJ; Luna R; López-Montiel D; Zalabardo C; Rando B
    Psychol Res; 2002 May; 66(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 12132115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrophysiological correlates of hierarchical stimulus processing: dissociation between onset and later stages of global and local target processing.
    Heinze HJ; Münte TF
    Neuropsychologia; 1993 Aug; 31(8):841-52. PubMed ID: 8413904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attention and interference in the processing of global and local information: effects of unilateral temporal-parietal junction lesions.
    Lamb MR; Robertson LC; Knight RT
    Neuropsychologia; 1989; 27(4):471-83. PubMed ID: 2733820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cerebral asymmetry in visual attention.
    Palmer T; Tzeng OJ
    Brain Cogn; 1990 May; 13(1):46-58. PubMed ID: 2346639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial frequency and attention: effects of level-, target-, and location-repetition on the processing of global and local forms.
    Lamb MR; Yund EW
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Apr; 58(3):363-73. PubMed ID: 8935897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of spatial frequency on global precedence and hemispheric differences.
    Hübner R
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Feb; 59(2):187-201. PubMed ID: 9055615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Component mechanisms underlying the processing of hierarchically organized patterns: inferences from patients with unilateral cortical lesions.
    Lamb MR; Robertson LC; Knight RT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 May; 16(3):471-83. PubMed ID: 2140405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hemispheric differences in matching Stroop-type letter stimuli.
    Alivisatos B; Wilding J
    Cortex; 1982 Apr; 18(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 7187633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemispheric processing of global form, local form, and texture.
    Kimchi R; Merhav I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1991 Apr; 76(2):133-47. PubMed ID: 1862728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can certain stimulus characteristics influence the hemispheric differences in global and local processing?
    Blanca Mena MJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1992 May; 79(3):201-17. PubMed ID: 1642135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.