These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2343824)

  • 21. Immediate and 24-h blood pressure-lowering effects of arm crank exercise in patients with traumatic lower-limb amputation: a randomized cross-over study.
    Paula-Ribeiro M; Martinez DG; Lima JRP; Laterza MC
    Blood Press Monit; 2018 Apr; 23(2):64-70. PubMed ID: 29227294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Regulating exercise intensity using ratings of perceived exertion during arm and leg ergometry.
    Kang J; Chaloupka EC; Mastrangelo MA; Donnelly MS; Martz WP; Robertson RJ
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1998 Aug; 78(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 9721003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The influence of crank configuration on muscle activity and torque production during arm crank ergometry.
    Smith PM; Chapman ML; Hazlehurst KE; Goss-Sampson MA
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2008 Aug; 18(4):598-605. PubMed ID: 17337211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Brachial blood pressure monitoring versus ankle monitoring during colonoscopy.
    Wilkes JM; DiPalma JA
    South Med J; 2004 Oct; 97(10):939-41. PubMed ID: 15558917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of forearm and upper arm blood pressures.
    Singer AJ; Kahn SR; Thode HC; Hollander JE
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 1999; 3(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 10225644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Systolic blood pressure at rest and during submaximal and maximal exercise on ergometer bicycle. The value of automatic and auscultatory determination].
    Petersen JR; Drabaek H; Mehlsen J; Haedersdal C; Møller ML
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1993 Mar; 155(9):631-5. PubMed ID: 8447031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Three methods of taking the brachial systolic pressure to measure the ankle/brachial index: which one is best?
    O'Flynn I
    J Vasc Nurs; 1993 Sep; 11(3):71-5. PubMed ID: 8286273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Validity and reliability of central blood pressure estimated by upper arm oscillometric cuff pressure.
    Climie RE; Schultz MG; Nikolic SB; Ahuja KD; Fell JW; Sharman JE
    Am J Hypertens; 2012 Apr; 25(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 22223041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Differences in blood pressure values by simultaneous auscultation of Korotkoff sounds inside the cuff and in the antecubital fossa.
    Weber F; Anlauf M; Hirche H; Roggenbuck U; Philipp T
    J Hum Hypertens; 1999 Oct; 13(10):695-700. PubMed ID: 10516740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of cuff-wrapping methods for the determination of ankle blood pressure.
    Takahashi O; Shimbo T; Rahman M; Okamoto S; Tanaka Y; Fukui T
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Feb; 11(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 16410737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Plasma cytokine and exertional responses in relation to exercise intensity and volume of exercising muscle mass during arm-crank ergometry.
    Paulson TA; Goosey-Tolfrey VL; Leicht CA; Bishop NC
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2015 Aug; 40(8):782-7. PubMed ID: 26176236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Discrepancies between direct and indirect blood pressure measurements using various recommendations for arm cuff selection.
    Clark JA; Lieh-Lai MW; Sarnaik A; Mattoo TK
    Pediatrics; 2002 Nov; 110(5):920-3. PubMed ID: 12415030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Association between an elevated inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference, the ankle-brachial index, and mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus.
    Ena J; Pérez-Martín S; Argente CR; Lozano T
    Clin Investig Arterioscler; 2020; 32(3):94-100. PubMed ID: 32044138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ankle to arm index following maximal exercise in normal subjects and athletes.
    Desvaux B; Abraham P; Colin D; Leftheriotis G; Saumet JL
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1996 Jul; 28(7):836-9. PubMed ID: 8832537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of varying cuff position on recording ankle systolic blood pressure.
    Anderson I
    J Wound Care; 2002 May; 11(5):185-9. PubMed ID: 12055944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Suitability of the forearm for non-invasive blood pressure measurement in children.
    Greaney D; Nakhjavani S; Desmond F; Tormey M; Dawkins I; O'Hare B
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2017 Nov; 27(11):1125-1130. PubMed ID: 29030927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of aortic and brachial cuff pressures in flat supine and lateral recumbent positions.
    Newton KM
    Heart Lung; 1981; 10(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 6912233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intra-arterial and cuff blood pressure responses during incremental cycle ergometry.
    Robinson TE; Sue DY; Huszczuk A; Weiler-Ravell D; Hansen JE
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1988 Apr; 20(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 3367749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of three blood pressure methods used for determining ankle/brachial index in patients with intermittent claudication.
    Gardner AW; Montgomery PS
    Angiology; 1998 Sep; 49(9):723-8. PubMed ID: 9756423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Validation of a method for determination of the ankle-brachial index in the seated position.
    Gornik HL; Garcia B; Wolski K; Jones DC; Macdonald KA; Fronek A
    J Vasc Surg; 2008 Nov; 48(5):1204-10. PubMed ID: 18829231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.