355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23440730)
1. Annual number of lung cancer deaths potentially avertable by screening in the United States.
Ma J; Ward EM; Smith R; Jemal A
Cancer; 2013 Apr; 119(7):1381-5. PubMed ID: 23440730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and Validation of Risk Models to Select Ever-Smokers for CT Lung Cancer Screening.
Katki HA; Kovalchik SA; Berg CD; Cheung LC; Chaturvedi AK
JAMA; 2016 Jun; 315(21):2300-11. PubMed ID: 27179989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Applying the National Lung Screening Trial eligibility criteria to the US population: what percent of the population and of incident lung cancers would be covered?
Pinsky PF; Berg CD
J Med Screen; 2012 Sep; 19(3):154-6. PubMed ID: 23060474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lung Cancer Risk and Demographic Characteristics of Current 20-29 Pack-year Smokers: Implications for Screening.
Pinsky PF; Kramer BS
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Nov; 107(11):. PubMed ID: 26483244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lung cancer screening using low-dose CT: the current national landscape.
Eberth JM; Qiu R; Adams SA; Salloum RG; Bell N; Arrington AK; Linder SK; Munden RF
Lung Cancer; 2014 Sep; 85(3):379-84. PubMed ID: 25088660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing Lung Cancer Screening Strategies in a Nationally Representative US Population Using Transportability Methods for the National Lung Cancer Screening Trial.
Robertson SE; Joyce NR; Steingrimsson JA; Stuart EA; Aberle DR; Gatsonis CA; Dahabreh IJ
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Jan; 7(1):e2346295. PubMed ID: 38289605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the Benefits and Harms of Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Meza R; Jeon J; Toumazis I; Ten Haaf K; Cao P; Bastani M; Han SS; Blom EF; Jonas DE; Feuer EJ; Plevritis SK; de Koning HJ; Kong CY
JAMA; 2021 Mar; 325(10):988-997. PubMed ID: 33687469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance and Cost-Effectiveness of Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening Scenarios in a Population-Based Setting: A Microsimulation Modeling Analysis in Ontario, Canada.
Ten Haaf K; Tammemägi MC; Bondy SJ; van der Aalst CM; Gu S; McGregor SE; Nicholas G; de Koning HJ; Paszat LF
PLoS Med; 2017 Feb; 14(2):e1002225. PubMed ID: 28170394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of the cancer risk management model lung cancer screening module.
Flanagan WM; Evans WK; Fitzgerald NR; Goffin JR; Miller AB; Wolfson MC
Health Rep; 2015 May; 26(5):11-8. PubMed ID: 25993046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of CT screening in the National Lung Screening Trial.
Black WC; Gareen IF; Soneji SS; Sicks JD; Keeler EB; Aberle DR; Naeim A; Church TR; Silvestri GA; Gorelick J; Gatsonis C;
N Engl J Med; 2014 Nov; 371(19):1793-802. PubMed ID: 25372087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comorbidities, smoking status, and life expectancy among individuals eligible for lung cancer screening.
Howard DH; Richards TB; Bach PB; Kegler MC; Berg CJ
Cancer; 2015 Dec; 121(24):4341-7. PubMed ID: 26372542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography: costs, national expenditures, and cost-effectiveness.
Goulart BH; Bensink ME; Mummy DG; Ramsey SD
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2012 Feb; 10(2):267-75. PubMed ID: 22308519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of lung cancer screening tests in the United States: results from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey.
Doria-Rose VP; White MC; Klabunde CN; Nadel MR; Richards TB; McNeel TS; Rodriguez JL; Marcus PM
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2012 Jul; 21(7):1049-59. PubMed ID: 22573798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimation of cigarette smoking-attributable morbidity in the United States.
Rostron BL; Chang CM; Pechacek TF
JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Dec; 174(12):1922-8. PubMed ID: 25317719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Meeting the cervical cancer screening needs of underserved women: the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 2004-2006.
Tangka FK; O'Hara B; Gardner JG; Turner J; Royalty J; Shaw K; Sabatino S; Hall IJ; Coates RJ
Cancer Causes Control; 2010 Jul; 21(7):1081-90. PubMed ID: 20361353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of HPV testing, HPV vaccine development, and changing screening frequency on national Pap test volume: projections from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS).
Eltoum IA; Roberson J
Cancer; 2007 Feb; 111(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 17262799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening for lung cancer: it works, but does it really work?
Silvestri GA
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Oct; 155(8):537-9. PubMed ID: 21893614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Association of Inclusion of More Black Individuals in Lung Cancer Screening With Reduced Mortality.
Prosper AE; Inoue K; Brown K; Bui AAT; Aberle D; Hsu W
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Aug; 4(8):e2119629. PubMed ID: 34427681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computed tomography screening for lung cancer: results of ten years of annual screening and validation of cosmos prediction model.
Veronesi G; Maisonneuve P; Rampinelli C; Bertolotti R; Petrella F; Spaggiari L; Bellomi M
Lung Cancer; 2013 Dec; 82(3):426-30. PubMed ID: 24099665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
