These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23441728)

  • 1. Regional air quality impacts of increased natural gas production and use in Texas.
    Pacsi AP; Alhajeri NS; Zavala-Araiza D; Webster MD; Allen DT
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Apr; 47(7):3521-7. PubMed ID: 23441728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Regional ozone impacts of increased natural gas use in the Texas power sector and development in the Eagle Ford shale.
    Pacsi AP; Kimura Y; McGaughey G; McDonald-Buller EC; Allen DT
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 49(6):3966-73. PubMed ID: 25723953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Atmospheric emissions and air quality impacts from natural gas production and use.
    Allen DT
    Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng; 2014; 5():55-75. PubMed ID: 24498952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implications of the recent reductions in natural gas prices for emissions of CO2 from the US power sector.
    Lu X; Salovaara J; McElroy MB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):3014-21. PubMed ID: 22321206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microscale air quality impacts of distributed power generation facilities.
    Olaguer EP; Knipping E; Shaw S; Ravindran S
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Aug; 66(8):795-806. PubMed ID: 27191342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ozone impacts of natural gas development in the Haynesville Shale.
    Kemball-Cook S; Bar-Ilan A; Grant J; Parker L; Jung J; Santamaria W; Mathews J; Yarwood G
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Dec; 44(24):9357-63. PubMed ID: 21086985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Air quality and health benefits from potential coal power plant closures in Texas.
    Strasert B; Teh SC; Cohan DS
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2019 Mar; 69(3):333-350. PubMed ID: 30339492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic Management of NOx and SO2 Emissions in the Texas and Mid-Atlantic Electric Power Systems and Implications for Air Quality.
    McDonald-Buller E; Kimura Y; Craig M; McGaughey G; Allen D; Webster M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Feb; 50(3):1611-9. PubMed ID: 26727552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Climate and environmental effects of electric vehicles versus compressed natural gas vehicles in China: a life-cycle analysis at provincial level.
    Huo H; Zhang Q; Liu F; He K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Feb; 47(3):1711-8. PubMed ID: 23276251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The London low emission zone baseline study.
    Kelly F; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Anderson HR; Barratt B; Beevers S; Cook D; Green D; Derwent D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Nov; (163):3-79. PubMed ID: 22315924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determining air quality and greenhouse gas impacts of hydrogen infrastructure and fuel cell vehicles.
    Stephens-Romero S; Carreras-Sospedra M; Brouwer J; Dabdub D; Samuelsen S
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Dec; 43(23):9022-9. PubMed ID: 19943683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling Emissions and Ozone Air Quality Impacts of Future Scenarios for Energy and Power Production in the Rocky Mountain States.
    Nsanzineza R; Capps SL; Milford JB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Jul; 53(13):7893-7902. PubMed ID: 31180656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of biogenic emissions with satellite-derived land use and land cover data for air quality modeling of Houston-Galveston ozone nonattainment area.
    Byun DW; Kim S; Czader B; Nowak D; Stetson S; Estes M
    J Environ Manage; 2005 Jun; 75(4):285-301. PubMed ID: 15854724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Atmospheric hydrocarbon emissions and concentrations in the barnett shale natural gas production region.
    Zavala-Araiza D; Sullivan DW; Allen DT
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 May; 48(9):5314-21. PubMed ID: 24712292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contributions of natural emissions to ozone and PM2.5 as simulated by the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model.
    Mueller SF; Mallard JW
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jun; 45(11):4817-23. PubMed ID: 21545154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical evaluation of the impact of shale gas activities on ozone pollution in North Texas.
    Ahmadi M; John K
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Dec; 536():457-467. PubMed ID: 26232756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles on ozone concentrations in Colorado.
    Brinkman GL; Denholm P; Hannigan MP; Milford JB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Aug; 44(16):6256-62. PubMed ID: 20704224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Demand response, behind-the-meter generation and air quality.
    Zhang X; Zhang KM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Feb; 49(3):1260-7. PubMed ID: 25556780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatially and Temporally Resolved Analysis of Environmental Trade-Offs in Electricity Generation.
    Peer RA; Garrison JB; Timms CP; Sanders KT
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Apr; 50(8):4537-45. PubMed ID: 26967826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implications of near-term coal power plant retirement for SO2 and NOX and life cycle GHG emissions.
    Venkatesh A; Jaramillo P; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(18):9838-45. PubMed ID: 22888978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.