These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23442026)
21. The Lombard Effect: From Acoustics to Neural Mechanisms. Luo J; Hage SR; Moss CF Trends Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 41(12):938-949. PubMed ID: 30115413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The perception of vocal signals by blue monkeys and grey-cheeked mangabeys. Brown CH Exp Biol; 1986; 45(3):145-65. PubMed ID: 3732496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Audio-vocal interaction in the pontine brainstem during self-initiated vocalization in the squirrel monkey. Hage SR; Jürgens U; Ehret G Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Jun; 23(12):3297-308. PubMed ID: 16820019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Acoustic communication in noise: regulation of call characteristics in a New World monkey. Brumm H; Voss K; Köllmer I; Todt D J Exp Biol; 2004 Jan; 207(Pt 3):443-8. PubMed ID: 14691092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The intelligibility of Lombard speech for non-native listeners. Cooke M; Lecumberri ML J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1120-9. PubMed ID: 22894231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of the starting point of the Lombard Effect. Bottalico P; Passione II; Graetzer S; Hunter EJ Acta Acust United Acust; 2017; 103(1):169-172. PubMed ID: 28959175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Convergence of calls as animals form social bonds, active compensation for noisy communication channels, and the evolution of vocal learning in mammals. Tyack PL J Comp Psychol; 2008 Aug; 122(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 18729661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Enhanced amplitude modulations contribute to the Lombard intelligibility benefit: Evidence from the Nijmegen Corpus of Lombard Speech. Bosker HR; Cooke M J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Feb; 147(2):721. PubMed ID: 32113258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Indicators of emotional arousal in vocal emissions of the humans and nonhuman mammals]. Volodin IA; Volodina EV; Gogoleva SS; Doronina LO Zh Obshch Biol; 2009; 70(3):210-24. PubMed ID: 19530598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Brown meagre vocalization rate increases during repetitive boat noise exposures: a possible case of vocal compensation. Picciulin M; Sebastianutto L; Codarin A; Calcagno G; Ferrero EA J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3118-24. PubMed ID: 23145597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Inhibiting the Lombard effect. Pick HL; Siegel GM; Fox PW; Garber SR; Kearney JK J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Feb; 85(2):894-900. PubMed ID: 2926004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Males increase call frequency, not intensity, in response to noise, revealing no Lombard effect in the little torrent frog. Zhao L; Sun X; Chen Q; Yang Y; Wang J; Ran J; Brauth SE; Tang Y; Cui J Ecol Evol; 2018 Dec; 8(23):11733-11741. PubMed ID: 30598771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Primate vocal communication: a useful tool for understanding human speech and language evolution? Fedurek P; Slocombe KE Hum Biol; 2011 Apr; 83(2):153-73. PubMed ID: 21615284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Dissimilarities in the vocal control over communication and echolocation calls in bats. Fenzl T; Schuller G Behav Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 182(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 17227683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of acoustic cue modifications on evoked vocal response to calls in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Vignal C; Mathevon N J Comp Psychol; 2011 May; 125(2):150-61. PubMed ID: 21341908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]