These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23442819)

  • 21. Toolbox for Protein Structure Prediction.
    Roche DB; McGuffin LJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1369():363-77. PubMed ID: 26519323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Introducing "best single template" models as reference baseline for the Continuous Automated Model Evaluation (CAMEO).
    Haas J; Gumienny R; Barbato A; Ackermann F; Tauriello G; Bertoni M; Studer G; Smolinski A; Schwede T
    Proteins; 2019 Dec; 87(12):1378-1387. PubMed ID: 31571280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. CONFOLD2: improved contact-driven ab initio protein structure modeling.
    Adhikari B; Cheng J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Jan; 19(1):22. PubMed ID: 29370750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. QAcon: single model quality assessment using protein structural and contact information with machine learning techniques.
    Cao R; Adhikari B; Bhattacharya D; Sun M; Hou J; Cheng J
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Feb; 33(4):586-588. PubMed ID: 28035027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Princeton_TIGRESS 2.0: High refinement consistency and net gains through support vector machines and molecular dynamics in double-blind predictions during the CASP11 experiment.
    Khoury GA; Smadbeck J; Kieslich CA; Koskosidis AJ; Guzman YA; Tamamis P; Floudas CA
    Proteins; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1078-1098. PubMed ID: 28241391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How to choose templates for modeling of protein complexes: Insights from benchmarking template-based docking.
    Chakravarty D; McElfresh GW; Kundrotas PJ; Vakser IA
    Proteins; 2020 Aug; 88(8):1070-1081. PubMed ID: 31994759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. i3Drefine software for protein 3D structure refinement and its assessment in CASP10.
    Bhattacharya D; Cheng J
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e69648. PubMed ID: 23894517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Protein-fold recognition using an improved single-source K diverse shortest paths algorithm.
    Lhota J; Xie L
    Proteins; 2016 Apr; 84(4):467-72. PubMed ID: 26800480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. FALCON@home: a high-throughput protein structure prediction server based on remote homologue recognition.
    Wang C; Zhang H; Zheng WM; Xu D; Zhu J; Wang B; Ning K; Sun S; Li SC; Bu D
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Feb; 32(3):462-4. PubMed ID: 26454278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. BAliBASE 3.0: latest developments of the multiple sequence alignment benchmark.
    Thompson JD; Koehl P; Ripp R; Poch O
    Proteins; 2005 Oct; 61(1):127-36. PubMed ID: 16044462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. (PS)2: protein structure prediction server.
    Chen CC; Hwang JK; Yang JM
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2006 Jul; 34(Web Server issue):W152-7. PubMed ID: 16844981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. 3Drefine: consistent protein structure refinement by optimizing hydrogen bonding network and atomic-level energy minimization.
    Bhattacharya D; Cheng J
    Proteins; 2013 Jan; 81(1):119-31. PubMed ID: 22927229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A benchmark server using high resolution protein structure data, and benchmark results for membrane helix predictions.
    Rath EM; Tessier D; Campbell AA; Lee HC; Werner T; Salam NK; Lee LK; Church WB
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Mar; 14():111. PubMed ID: 23530628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. GalaxyWEB server for protein structure prediction and refinement.
    Ko J; Park H; Heo L; Seok C
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2012 Jul; 40(Web Server issue):W294-7. PubMed ID: 22649060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. MESSA: MEta-Server for protein Sequence Analysis.
    Cong Q; Grishin NV
    BMC Biol; 2012 Oct; 10():82. PubMed ID: 23031578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessment of template-based modeling of protein structure in CASP11.
    Modi V; Xu Q; Adhikari S; Dunbrack RL
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):200-20. PubMed ID: 27081927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. DOMAC: an accurate, hybrid protein domain prediction server.
    Cheng J
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2007 Jul; 35(Web Server issue):W354-6. PubMed ID: 17553833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Identification of similar regions of protein structures using integrated sequence and structure analysis tools.
    Peters B; Moad C; Youn E; Buffington K; Heiland R; Mooney S
    BMC Struct Biol; 2006 Mar; 6():4. PubMed ID: 16526955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. OXBench: a benchmark for evaluation of protein multiple sequence alignment accuracy.
    Raghava GP; Searle SM; Audley PC; Barber JD; Barton GJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2003 Oct; 4():47. PubMed ID: 14552658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. VoroMQA: Assessment of protein structure quality using interatomic contact areas.
    Olechnovič K; Venclovas Č
    Proteins; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1131-1145. PubMed ID: 28263393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.