These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23444082)

  • 1. Can attentional control settings be maintained for two color-location conjunctions? Evidence from an RSVP task.
    Irons JL; Remington RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):862-75. PubMed ID: 23444082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An inability to set independent attentional control settings by hemifield.
    Becker MW; Ravizza SM; Peltier C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2640-52. PubMed ID: 26220268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiple attentional control settings at distinct locations without the confounding of repetition priming.
    Cho SA; Cho YS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1718-1730. PubMed ID: 29959663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The attentional blink freezes spatial attention allocation to targets, not distractors: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Pomerleau VJ; Fortier-Gauthier U; Corriveau I; McDonald JJ; Dell'Acqua R; Jolicœur P
    Brain Res; 2014 Apr; 1559():33-45. PubMed ID: 24607298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. All set, indeed! N2pc components reveal simultaneous attentional control settings for multiple target colors.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1215-30. PubMed ID: 26950386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The perceptual enhancement by spatial attention is impaired during the attentional blink.
    Bae E; Jung S; Han SW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Oct; 190():150-158. PubMed ID: 30119048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Previous attentional set can induce an attentional blink with task-irrelevant initial targets.
    Thompson C; Underwood G; Crundall D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Dec; 60(12):1603-9. PubMed ID: 17853197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unexpected abrupt onsets can override a top-down set for color.
    Folk CL; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):1153-65. PubMed ID: 26030438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interactions between space-based and feature-based attention.
    Leonard CJ; Balestreri A; Luck SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 25285472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attentional engagement is not sufficient to prevent spatial capture.
    Zivony A; Lamy D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jan; 76(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 24043565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Zooming in on the cause of the perceptual load effect in the go/no-go paradigm.
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1072-87. PubMed ID: 26820251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Category-based attentional capture can be influenced by color- and shape-dimensions independently in the conjunction search task.
    Wu X; Wang X; Saab R; Jiang Y
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Apr; 57(4):e13526. PubMed ID: 31953842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distinct roles of the intraparietal sulcus and temporoparietal junction in attentional capture from distractor features: An individual differences approach.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 74():50-62. PubMed ID: 25724234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. No commonality between attentional capture and attentional blink.
    Kawahara JI; Kihara K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):991-1008. PubMed ID: 21113860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. All set! Evidence of simultaneous attentional control settings for multiple target colors.
    Irons JL; Folk CL; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):758-75. PubMed ID: 22201470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prior entry and temporal attention: cueing affects order errors in RSVP.
    Hilkenmeier F; Olivers CN; Scharlau I
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):180-90. PubMed ID: 22082215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Overt attention in contextual cuing of visual search is driven by the attentional set, but not by the predictiveness of distractors.
    Beesley T; Hanafi G; Vadillo MA; Shanks DR; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):707-721. PubMed ID: 29608077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Probability cueing of singleton-distractor locations in visual search: Priority-map- versus dimension-based inhibition?
    Zhang B; Allenmark F; Liesefeld HR; Shi Z; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1146-1163. PubMed ID: 31144860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.