110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23444418)
1. Research council failed to clearly communicate its open access policy, say peers.
Mayor S
BMJ; 2013 Feb; 346():f1277. PubMed ID: 23444418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access.
Beall J
Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):179. PubMed ID: 22972258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Rich nations are feeding research predators.
Vogel L
CMAJ; 2017 Oct; 189(42):E1322-E1323. PubMed ID: 29061861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The crisis in scholarly publishing: open access to the rescue?
Oren GA
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18347450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Expanding access to published research: open access and self-archiving.
Mower A; Youngkin ME
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 18347463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Connections between open access publishing and access to gray literature.
Banks M
J Med Libr Assoc; 2004 Apr; 92(2):164-6. PubMed ID: 15088074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A suggested code of conduct for editors of peer-reviewed journals.
Glover D
J Wound Care; 2006 Feb; 15(2):85-6. PubMed ID: 16521599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. ["Predatory publishers"].
Olsson H
Lakartidningen; 2012 Nov 21-27; 109(47):2136. PubMed ID: 23330475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Open access mandate threatens dissemination of scientific information.
McMullan E
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 18347464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Research for all.
Fletcher J
CMAJ; 2012 Oct; 184(15):1657. PubMed ID: 23071375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Widening access to research publications.
Sandall J
Midwifery; 2012 Dec; 28(6):727. PubMed ID: 23206415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Three cheers for peers.
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Fraud: just say no!
Blaustein JD
Endocrinology; 2010 Jan; 151(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20028876
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Peers under pressure.
Dalton R
Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6852):102-4. PubMed ID: 11557944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Confusion surrounds UK policy on open access publishing, review finds.
Limb M
BMJ; 2015 Mar; 350():h1710. PubMed ID: 25817633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Life begins again at age 126!
Pietrini P; Ghelarducci B
Arch Ital Biol; 2008 Mar; 146(1):2p preceding 1. PubMed ID: 18666443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. What has Science's open-access sting taught us about the quality of peer review?
Tatalović M
Bosn J Basic Med Sci; 2013 Nov; 13(4):209-11. PubMed ID: 24427852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Peer review. The millennium engima: more is less.
Gordon LH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Sep; 82(9):1361-2. PubMed ID: 11005535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Open access publishing, NIH policy and the Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine.
Quan SF
J Clin Sleep Med; 2005 Jul; 1(3):233-4. PubMed ID: 17566181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Role of Mainstream Publishers in Eliminating the Threat of Predatory Publishing.
Chandrakumar A; 't Jong GW; Klassen TP
Can J Diabetes; 2018 Oct; 42(5):457-458. PubMed ID: 30268229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
