These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23444659)

  • 1. Study: using lower volumes of contrast media can produce reasonable quality CT studies.
    Health Devices; 2012 Jul; 41(7):229-30. PubMed ID: 23444659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Saving intravenously administered contrast media in CT diagnosis by using multi-phase pumps].
    Loose R
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Mar; 7(2):103. PubMed ID: 9172661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrast and cost savings by implementation of a multidose bulk IV contrast delivery system.
    Routhier J; Piazzo K; Sodickson A
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Apr; 8(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 21458765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating contrast agent waste and costs of weight-based CT contrast bolus protocols using single- or multiple-dose packaging.
    Robinson JD; Mitsumori LM; Linnau KF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jun; 200(6):W617-20. PubMed ID: 23701092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost reduction in abdominal CT by weight-adjusted dose.
    Arana E; Martí-Bonmatí L; Tobarra E; Sierra C
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jun; 70(3):507-11. PubMed ID: 18337042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of volume of low osmolality contrast medium needed for routine helical abdominal CT.
    Megibow AJ; Jacob G; Heiken JP; Paulson EK; Hopper KD; Sica G; Saini S; Birnbaum BA; Redvanley R; Fishman EK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Mar; 176(3):583-9. PubMed ID: 11222185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Optimizing and adjusting the intravenous contrast medium in the CT diagnosis of the thorax].
    Ehritt-Braun C; Ferstl F; Burger D; Krause W; Langer M
    Rofo; 1994 Apr; 160(4):364-5. PubMed ID: 8161752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Value of intravenous injection of contrast media in thoracic computed tomography].
    Beyer-Enke SA; Görich J; Müller M; Tüngerthal S; van Kaick G
    Rontgenpraxis; 1988 Jun; 41(6):219-25. PubMed ID: 3388145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of X-ray tube parameters, iodine concentration, and patient size on image quality in pulmonary computed tomography angiography: a chest-phantom-study.
    Szucs-Farkas Z; Verdun FR; von Allmen G; Mini RL; Vock P
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Jun; 43(6):374-81. PubMed ID: 18496042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimization of contrast enhancement in thoracic MDCT.
    Bae KT
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Jan; 48(1):9-29. PubMed ID: 19995627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chest MSCT acquisition and injection protocols.
    Salgado RA; Spinhoven M; De Jongh K; Op de Beeck B; Corthouts B; Parizel PM
    JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(2):97-9. PubMed ID: 17555068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selective use of low-osmolality contrast agents for i.v. urography and CT: safety and effect on cost.
    Hunter TB; Dye J; Duval JF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):965-8. PubMed ID: 8092044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pulmonary nodules: Contrast-enhanced volumetric variation at different CT scan delays.
    Rampinelli C; Raimondi S; Padrenostro M; De Fiori E; Meroni S; Veronesi G; Bellomi M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jul; 195(1):149-54. PubMed ID: 20566809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness and patient tolerance of low-attenuation oral contrast material: milk versus VoLumen.
    Koo CW; Shah-Patel LR; Baer JW; Frager DH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 May; 190(5):1307-13. PubMed ID: 18430848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Fundamental studies of x-ray computed tomography diagnosis].
    Sako M
    Rinsho Hoshasen; 1989 Sep; 34(10):1083-9. PubMed ID: 2689702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-Minimization Analysis of Multidose and Single-Dose Packaging of Contrast Media for Contrast-Enhanced CT: Results From Real-World Data in China.
    Wei Y; He Z; Zhang C; Ming J; Fan Z; Ma F; Shi L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jul; 215(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 32208008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Low osmolar (non-ionic) contrast media versus high osmolar (ionic) contrast media in intravenous urography and enhanced computerized tomography: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Wangsuphachart S
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1991 Dec; 22(4):664-76. PubMed ID: 1820658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contrast Administration in CT: A Patient-Centric Approach.
    Kalra MK; Becker HC; Enterline DS; Lowry CR; Molvin LZ; Singh R; Rybicki FJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Mar; 16(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 30082238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of contrast material on image noise and radiation dose in adult chest computed tomography using automatic exposure control: a comparative study between 16-, 64- and 128-slice CT.
    Paul J; Schell B; Kerl JM; Maentele W; Vogl TJ; Bauer RW
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Aug; 79(2):e128-32. PubMed ID: 21640536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safety summary: Computed tomography.
    Health Devices; 2012 Jul; 41(7):228-9. PubMed ID: 23444658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.