77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23444659)
1. Study: using lower volumes of contrast media can produce reasonable quality CT studies.
Health Devices; 2012 Jul; 41(7):229-30. PubMed ID: 23444659
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Saving intravenously administered contrast media in CT diagnosis by using multi-phase pumps].
Loose R
Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Mar; 7(2):103. PubMed ID: 9172661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Contrast and cost savings by implementation of a multidose bulk IV contrast delivery system.
Routhier J; Piazzo K; Sodickson A
J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Apr; 8(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 21458765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating contrast agent waste and costs of weight-based CT contrast bolus protocols using single- or multiple-dose packaging.
Robinson JD; Mitsumori LM; Linnau KF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jun; 200(6):W617-20. PubMed ID: 23701092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost reduction in abdominal CT by weight-adjusted dose.
Arana E; Martí-Bonmatí L; Tobarra E; Sierra C
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jun; 70(3):507-11. PubMed ID: 18337042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of volume of low osmolality contrast medium needed for routine helical abdominal CT.
Megibow AJ; Jacob G; Heiken JP; Paulson EK; Hopper KD; Sica G; Saini S; Birnbaum BA; Redvanley R; Fishman EK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Mar; 176(3):583-9. PubMed ID: 11222185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Optimizing and adjusting the intravenous contrast medium in the CT diagnosis of the thorax].
Ehritt-Braun C; Ferstl F; Burger D; Krause W; Langer M
Rofo; 1994 Apr; 160(4):364-5. PubMed ID: 8161752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Value of intravenous injection of contrast media in thoracic computed tomography].
Beyer-Enke SA; Görich J; Müller M; Tüngerthal S; van Kaick G
Rontgenpraxis; 1988 Jun; 41(6):219-25. PubMed ID: 3388145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of X-ray tube parameters, iodine concentration, and patient size on image quality in pulmonary computed tomography angiography: a chest-phantom-study.
Szucs-Farkas Z; Verdun FR; von Allmen G; Mini RL; Vock P
Invest Radiol; 2008 Jun; 43(6):374-81. PubMed ID: 18496042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimization of contrast enhancement in thoracic MDCT.
Bae KT
Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Jan; 48(1):9-29. PubMed ID: 19995627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Chest MSCT acquisition and injection protocols.
Salgado RA; Spinhoven M; De Jongh K; Op de Beeck B; Corthouts B; Parizel PM
JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(2):97-9. PubMed ID: 17555068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selective use of low-osmolality contrast agents for i.v. urography and CT: safety and effect on cost.
Hunter TB; Dye J; Duval JF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):965-8. PubMed ID: 8092044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pulmonary nodules: Contrast-enhanced volumetric variation at different CT scan delays.
Rampinelli C; Raimondi S; Padrenostro M; De Fiori E; Meroni S; Veronesi G; Bellomi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jul; 195(1):149-54. PubMed ID: 20566809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness and patient tolerance of low-attenuation oral contrast material: milk versus VoLumen.
Koo CW; Shah-Patel LR; Baer JW; Frager DH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 May; 190(5):1307-13. PubMed ID: 18430848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Fundamental studies of x-ray computed tomography diagnosis].
Sako M
Rinsho Hoshasen; 1989 Sep; 34(10):1083-9. PubMed ID: 2689702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-Minimization Analysis of Multidose and Single-Dose Packaging of Contrast Media for Contrast-Enhanced CT: Results From Real-World Data in China.
Wei Y; He Z; Zhang C; Ming J; Fan Z; Ma F; Shi L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jul; 215(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 32208008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Low osmolar (non-ionic) contrast media versus high osmolar (ionic) contrast media in intravenous urography and enhanced computerized tomography: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Wangsuphachart S
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1991 Dec; 22(4):664-76. PubMed ID: 1820658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contrast Administration in CT: A Patient-Centric Approach.
Kalra MK; Becker HC; Enterline DS; Lowry CR; Molvin LZ; Singh R; Rybicki FJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Mar; 16(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 30082238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of contrast material on image noise and radiation dose in adult chest computed tomography using automatic exposure control: a comparative study between 16-, 64- and 128-slice CT.
Paul J; Schell B; Kerl JM; Maentele W; Vogl TJ; Bauer RW
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Aug; 79(2):e128-32. PubMed ID: 21640536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Safety summary: Computed tomography.
Health Devices; 2012 Jul; 41(7):228-9. PubMed ID: 23444658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]