These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. [Image quality measurements on x-ray image-enhanced television links]. Mohr M Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1986; 27(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 3961144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques]. Busch HP Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Quality assurance in dental radiography: intra-oral image quality analysis. Bolas A; Fitzgerald M J Ir Dent Assoc; 2008 Dec-2009 Jan; 54(6):274-8. PubMed ID: 19189748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Spatial resolution of digital systems: is the visual determination with a lead bar pattern meaningful?]. Neitzel U Rofo; 2003 Dec; 175(12):1724-7. PubMed ID: 14661146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Optimizing digital radiography of children. Willis CE Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):266-73. PubMed ID: 19345030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Some considerations about developments of rural digital X-ray radiography systems]. Cui GZ Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2008 Nov; 32(6):431-3. PubMed ID: 19253577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Obstacles remain on road to digital mammography. Johnson M Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; Suppl Digital():D19-21. PubMed ID: 10724731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. PACS: radiology in the digital world. Rogers LF AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Sep; 177(3):499. PubMed ID: 11517037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose. Seibert JA Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 18849693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Reject analysis in direct digital radiography. Andersen ER; Jorde J; Taoussi N; Yaqoob SH; Konst B; Seierstad T Acta Radiol; 2012 Mar; 53(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 22287147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The current status of full-field digital mammography quality control. Williams MB; Goodale PJ; Butler PF J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Dec; 1(12):936-51. PubMed ID: 17411736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An alternative method for noise analysis using pixel variance as part of quality control procedures on digital mammography systems. Bouwman R; Young K; Lazzari B; Ravaglia V; Broeders M; van Engen R Phys Med Biol; 2009 Nov; 54(22):6809-22. PubMed ID: 19847017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [The measurement of the dynamic range of digital systems for visualizing x-ray images]. Kozlovskiĭ EB Med Tekh; 2000; (5):26-8. PubMed ID: 11076361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. DR and CR: Recent advances in technology. Schaefer-Prokop CM; De Boo DW; Uffmann M; Prokop M Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 19695809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]