These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23444759)

  • 41. Foley catheter versus intravaginal prostaglandins E2 for cervical ripening in women at term with an unfavorable cervix: a randomized controlled trial.
    Barda G; Ganer Herman H; Sagiv R; Bar J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Oct; 31(20):2777-2781. PubMed ID: 28764579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Intravaginal glyceryl trinitrate and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
    Nunes FP; Campos AP; Pedroso SR; Leite CF; Avillez TP; Rodrigues RD; Meirinho M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 194(4):1022-6. PubMed ID: 16580291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparison of labour induction with misoprostol and dinoprostone and characterization of uterine response based on electrohysterogram.
    Benalcazar-Parra C; Monfort-Orti R; Ye-Lin Y; Prats-Boluda G; Alberola-Rubio J; Perales A; Garcia-Casado J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 May; 32(10):1586-1594. PubMed ID: 29251182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Two dosing regimens for preinduction cervical priming with intravaginal dinoprostone pessary: a randomised clinical trial.
    Tan LK; Tay SK
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Sep; 106(9):907-12. PubMed ID: 10492100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Randomized trial between two active labor management protocols in the presence of an unfavorable cervix.
    Bolnick JM; Velazquez MD; Gonzalez JL; Rappaport VJ; McIlwain-Dunivan G; Rayburn WF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 190(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 14749647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A randomized trial comparing vaginal and cervical prostaglandin gel for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Irion O; Pedrazzoli J; Mermillod B
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jan; 91(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 9464723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. In vivo controlled release of PGE2 from a vaginal insert (0.8 mm, 10 mg) during induction of labour.
    Lyrenäs S; Clason I; Ulmsten U
    BJOG; 2001 Feb; 108(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 11236117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
    Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW
    BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Cervical Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial].
    Oliveira MV; Oberst PV; Leite GK; Aguemi A; Kenj G; Leme VD; Sass N
    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2010 Jul; 32(7):346-51. PubMed ID: 21152844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Use of misoprostol for cervical ripening.
    Katz VL; Farmer RM; Dean CA; Carpenter ME
    South Med J; 2000 Sep; 93(9):881-4. PubMed ID: 11005347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Meyer M; Pflum J; Howard D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Cervical ripening and induction of labor by prostaglandin E2: a comparison between intracervical gel and vaginal pessary.
    D'Aniello G; Bocchi C; Florio P; Ignacchiti E; Guidoni CG; Centini G; Cito G; Picciolini E; Severi FM; Petraglia F
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2003 Sep; 14(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 14694970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Uterine hyperstimulation following cervix ripening with dinoprostone in a vaginal insert system].
    Brouwers JM; Briët JW; Brouwers JR
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2004 Jun; 148(26):1300-3. PubMed ID: 15279216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Second dose of PGE
    Mohr-Sasson A; Schiff E; Sindel O; Suday RR; Kalter-Farber A; Mashiach R; Yinon Y; Dulitzki M; Sivan E; Mazaki-Tovi S
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Sep; 30(17):2074-2077. PubMed ID: 27633399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Impact of prolonged dinoprostone cervical ripening on the rate of artificial induction of labor: a prospective study of 330 patients.
    Denoual-Ziad C; Aicardi-Nicolas S; Creveuil C; Gaillard C; Dreyfus M; Benoist G
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Mar; 41(3):370-6. PubMed ID: 25331791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Pregnancy outcomes after failed cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 followed by Foley balloon catheter.
    Mizrachi Y; Levy M; Weiner E; Bar J; Barda G; Kovo M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Oct; 29(19):3229-33. PubMed ID: 26572735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Double-balloon catheter vs. dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix.
    Du C; Liu Y; Liu Y; Ding H; Zhang R; Tan J
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jun; 291(6):1221-7. PubMed ID: 25408273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Labor induction with prostaglandin E1 misoprostol compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a randomized trial.
    Sanchez-Ramos L; Peterson DE; Delke I; Gaudier FL; Kaunitz AM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Mar; 91(3):401-5. PubMed ID: 9491868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Labor induction in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix: double balloon catheter versus dinoprostone.
    Suffecool K; Rosenn BM; Kam S; Mushi J; Foroutan J; Herrera K
    J Perinat Med; 2014 Mar; 42(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 24096438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.