These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2344539)

  • 1. Health checks in general practice: another example of inverse care?
    Waller D; Agass M; Mant D; Coulter A; Fuller A; Jones L
    BMJ; 1990 Apr; 300(6732):1115-8. PubMed ID: 2344539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Registration health checks: inverse care in the inner city?
    Griffiths C; Cooke S; Toon P
    Br J Gen Pract; 1994 May; 44(382):201-4. PubMed ID: 8204332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors affecting response to an invitation to attend for a health check.
    Thorogood M; Coulter A; Jones L; Yudkin P; Muir J; Mant D
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1993 Jun; 47(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 8350036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective study of predictors of attendance for breast screening in inner London.
    Sutton S; Bickler G; Sancho-Aldridge J; Saidi G
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1994 Feb; 48(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 8138773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lifestyle advice in general practice: rates recalled by patients.
    Silagy C; Muir J; Coulter A; Thorogood M; Yudkin P; Roe L
    BMJ; 1992 Oct; 305(6858):871-4. PubMed ID: 1422405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prevalence of risk factors for heart disease in OXCHECK trial: implications for screening in primary care. Imperial Cancer Research Fund OXCHECK Study Group.
    BMJ; 1991 May; 302(6784):1057-60. PubMed ID: 2036503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effectiveness of an enhanced invitation letter on uptake of National Health Service Health Checks in primary care: a pragmatic quasi-randomised controlled trial.
    Sallis A; Bunten A; Bonus A; James A; Chadborn T; Berry D
    BMC Fam Pract; 2016 Mar; 17():35. PubMed ID: 27009045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prevention in practice: results of a 2-year follow-up of routine health promotion interventions in general practice.
    Dowell AC; Ochera JJ; Hilton SR; Bland JM; Harris T; Jones DR; Katbamna S
    Fam Pract; 1996 Aug; 13(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 8872092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting the uptake of health checks in general practice: invitation methods and patients' health beliefs.
    Norman P
    Soc Sci Med; 1993 Jul; 37(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 8332925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. NHS health checks: a cross- sectional observational study on equity of uptake and outcomes.
    Coghill N; Garside L; Montgomery AA; Feder G; Horwood J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Apr; 18(1):238. PubMed ID: 29615026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are smokers less likely to seek preventive healthcare measures in Italy?
    Carreras G; Iannucci L; Costa G; Chellini E; Gorini G
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2018 Sep; 27(5):507-513. PubMed ID: 28379886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Invitation to attend a health check in a general practice setting: the views of a cohort of non-attenders.
    Pill R; Stott N
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1988 Feb; 38(307):57-60. PubMed ID: 3204566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of non-attenders on the potential of a primary care programme to reduce cardiovascular risk in the population. Family Heart Study Group.
    Davies G; Pyke S; Kinmonth AL
    BMJ; 1994 Dec; 309(6968):1553-6. PubMed ID: 7819899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using general practitioners to recruit individuals with low socioeconomic position to preventive health checks is feasible: a cross sectional study.
    Kamstrup-Larsen N; Dalton SO; Broholm-Jørgensen M; Larsen LB; Thomsen JL; Johansen C; Tolstrup JS
    Scand J Prim Health Care; 2019 Sep; 37(3):294-301. PubMed ID: 31286817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized trial of mail vs. telephone invitation to a community-based cardiovascular health awareness program for older family practice patients [ISRCTN61739603].
    Karwalajtys T; Kaczorowski J; Chambers LW; Levitt C; Dolovich L; McDonough B; Patterson C; Williams JE
    BMC Fam Pract; 2005 Aug; 6():35. PubMed ID: 16111487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cardiovascular risk at health checks performed opportunistically or following an invitation letter. Cohort study.
    Gulliford MC; Khoshaba B; McDermott L; Cornelius V; Ashworth M; Fuller F; Miller J; Dodhia H; Wright AJ
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2018 Jun; 40(2):e151-e156. PubMed ID: 28633511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomised controlled trial comparing uptake of NHS Health Check in response to standard letters, risk-personalised letters and telephone invitations.
    Gidlow CJ; Ellis NJ; Riley V; Chadborn T; Bunten A; Iqbal Z; Ahmed A; Fisher A; Sugden D; Clark-Carter D
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Feb; 19(1):224. PubMed ID: 30791884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What do we know about who does and does not attend general health checks? Findings from a narrative scoping review.
    Dryden R; Williams B; McCowan C; Themessl-Huber M
    BMC Public Health; 2012 Aug; 12():723. PubMed ID: 22938046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Case against targeting long term non-attenders in general practice for a health check.
    Thomas KJ; Nicholl JP; Fall M; Lowy A; Williams BT
    Br J Gen Pract; 1993 Jul; 43(372):285-9. PubMed ID: 8398245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Views and experiences of the NHS Health Check provided by general medical practices: cross-sectional survey in high-risk patients.
    Krska J; du Plessis R; Chellaswamy H
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2015 Jun; 37(2):210-7. PubMed ID: 25118218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.