These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23446044)

  • 1. Comparison of Kasai autocorrelation and maximum likelihood estimators for Doppler optical coherence tomography.
    Chan AC; Lam EY; Srinivasan VJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Jun; 32(6):1033-42. PubMed ID: 23446044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maximum likelihood Doppler frequency estimation under decorrelation noise for quantifying flow in optical coherence tomography.
    Chan AC; Srinivasan VJ; Lam EY
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2014 Jun; 33(6):1313-23. PubMed ID: 24760902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative technique for robust and noise-tolerant speed measurements based on speckle decorrelation in optical coherence tomography.
    Uribe-Patarroyo N; Villiger M; Bouma BE
    Opt Express; 2014 Oct; 22(20):24411-29. PubMed ID: 25322018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultrasound Ultrafast Power Doppler Imaging with High Signal-to-Noise Ratio by Temporal Multiply-and-Sum (TMAS) Autocorrelation.
    Shen CC; Guo FT
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(21):. PubMed ID: 36366046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wide dynamic range detection of bidirectional flow in Doppler optical coherence tomography using a two-dimensional Kasai estimator.
    Morofke D; Kolios MC; Vitkin IA; Yang VX
    Opt Lett; 2007 Feb; 32(3):253-5. PubMed ID: 17215936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal velocity estimation in ultrasound color flow imaging in presence of clutter.
    Løvstakken L; Bjaerum S; Torp H
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2007 Mar; 54(3):539-49. PubMed ID: 17375823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An adaptive approach to computing the spectrum and mean frequency of Doppler signals.
    Herment A; Giovannelli JF
    Ultrason Imaging; 1995 Jan; 17(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 7638930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance analysis of optical coherence tomography in the context of a thickness estimation task.
    Huang J; Yao J; Cirucci N; Ivanov T; Rolland JP
    J Biomed Opt; 2015 Dec; 20(12):121306. PubMed ID: 26378988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New estimators and guidelines for better use of fetal heart rate estimators with Doppler ultrasound devices.
    Voicu I; Ménigot S; Kouamé D; Girault JM
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2014; 2014():784862. PubMed ID: 24624224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enhancement and bias removal of optical coherence tomography images: An iterative approach with adaptive bilateral filtering.
    Sudeep PV; Issac Niwas S; Palanisamy P; Rajan J; Xiaojun Y; Wang X; Luo Y; Liu L
    Comput Biol Med; 2016 Apr; 71():97-107. PubMed ID: 26907572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimator for photon counting energy selective x-ray imaging with multibin pulse height analysis.
    Alvarez RE
    Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2324-34. PubMed ID: 21776766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Error analysis of ultrasonic tissue doppler velocity estimation techniques for quantification of velocity and strain.
    Bennett MJ; McLaughlin S; Anderson T; McDicken WN
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 33(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 17189049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Necessary conditions for a maximum likelihood estimate to become asymptotically unbiased and attain the Cramer-Rao lower bound. Part I. General approach with an application to time-delay and Doppler shift estimation.
    Naftali E; Makris NC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):1917-30. PubMed ID: 11681372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maximum a posteriori estimator for high-contrast image composition of optical coherence tomography.
    Chan AC; Kurokawa K; Makita S; Miura M; Yasuno Y
    Opt Lett; 2016 Jan; 41(2):321-4. PubMed ID: 26766704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated noise estimation in polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography.
    Keahey PA; Bouma BE; Villiger M
    Opt Lett; 2020 May; 45(10):2748-2751. PubMed ID: 32412457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical properties of phase-decorrelation in phase-resolved Doppler optical coherence tomography.
    Vakoc BJ; Tearney GJ; Bouma BE
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Jun; 28(6):814-21. PubMed ID: 19164078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Doppler OCT clutter rejection using variance minimization and offset extrapolation.
    Akif A; Walek K; Polucha C; Lee J
    Biomed Opt Express; 2018 Nov; 9(11):5340-5352. PubMed ID: 30460132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiframe denoising of high-speed optical coherence tomography data using interframe and intraframe priors.
    Bian L; Suo J; Chen F; Dai Q
    J Biomed Opt; 2015 Mar; 20(3):036006. PubMed ID: 25751163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new wideband spread target maximum likelihood estimator for blood velocity estimation. I. Theory.
    Ferrara KW; Algazi VR
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1991; 38(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 18267551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spectral estimators in elastography.
    Konofagou EE; Varghese T; Ophir J
    Ultrasonics; 2000 Mar; 38(1-8):412-6. PubMed ID: 10829698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.