These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Functional and patient-reported outcomes in symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis following percutaneous decompression. Mekhail N; Costandi S; Abraham B; Samuel SW Pain Pract; 2012 Jul; 12(6):417-25. PubMed ID: 22651852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MILD® Is an Effective Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: MiDAS ENCORE Randomized Controlled Trial. Benyamin RM; Staats PS; MiDAS Encore I Pain Physician; 2016 May; 19(4):229-42. PubMed ID: 27228511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Systematic safety review and meta-analysis of procedural experience using percutaneous access to treat symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. Levy RM; Deer TR Pain Med; 2012 Dec; 13(12):1554-61. PubMed ID: 23136978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Five-year results of a clinical pilot study utilizing a pedicle-lengthening osteotomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Mlyavykh S; Ludwig SC; Kepler CK; Anderson DG J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Sep; 29(3):241-249. PubMed ID: 29856305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. X-stop versus decompressive surgery for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication: randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Strömqvist BH; Berg S; Gerdhem P; Johnsson R; Möller A; Sahlstrand T; Soliman A; Tullberg T Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Aug; 38(17):1436-42. PubMed ID: 23403549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. mild Interlaminar decompression for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: procedure description and case series with 1-year follow-up. Wong WH Clin J Pain; 2012 Jul; 28(6):534-8. PubMed ID: 22673487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MiDAS I (mild Decompression Alternative to Open Surgery): a preliminary report of a prospective, multi-center clinical study. Chopko B; Caraway DL Pain Physician; 2010; 13(4):369-78. PubMed ID: 20648206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis. Postacchini R; Ferrari E; Cinotti G; Menchetti PP; Postacchini F Spine J; 2011 Oct; 11(10):933-9. PubMed ID: 22005077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical analysis following lumbar interspinous devices implant: where we are and where we go. Grasso G; Giambartino F; Iacopino DG Spinal Cord; 2014 Oct; 52(10):740-3. PubMed ID: 24912549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study with 2-year follow-up to compare the performance of decompression with and without interlaminar stabilization. Schmidt S; Franke J; Rauschmann M; Adelt D; Bonsanto MM; Sola S J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Apr; 28(4):406-415. PubMed ID: 29372860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis. Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lumbar spinous process splitting decompression provides equivalent outcomes to conventional midline decompression in degenerative lumbar canal stenosis: a prospective, randomized controlled study of 51 patients. Rajasekaran S; Thomas A; Kanna RM; Prasad Shetty A Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Sep; 38(20):1737-43. PubMed ID: 23797498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical and psychofunctional measures of conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective cohort study. Gunzburg R; Keller TS; Szpalski M; Vandeputte K; Spratt KF Eur Spine J; 2003 Apr; 12(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 12709858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Failure of percutaneous remodeling of the ligamentum flavum and lamina for neurogenic claudication. Wilkinson JS; Fourney DR Neurosurgery; 2012 Jul; 71(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 22407072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Step treatment strategy of degenerative lumbar scoliosis and spinal stenosis]. Zhang Z; Ren D; Sun T; Li F; Guan K; Zhao G; Shan J Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 25(8):951-5. PubMed ID: 21923023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Procedure for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Neurogenic Claudication: 2-Year Results of MiDAS ENCORE. Staats PS; Chafin TB; Golovac S; Kim CK; Li S; Richardson WB; Vallejo R; Wahezi SE; Washabaugh EP; Benyamin RM; Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2018 Oct; 43(7):789-794. PubMed ID: 30199512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally invasive lumbar spinal decompression in the elderly: outcomes of 50 patients aged 75 years and older. Rosen DS; O'Toole JE; Eichholz KM; Hrubes M; Huo D; Sandhu FA; Fessler RG Neurosurgery; 2007 Mar; 60(3):503-9; discussion 509-10. PubMed ID: 17327795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]