BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23446226)

  • 1. The effects of limited bandwidth and noise on verbal processing time and word recall in normal-hearing children.
    McCreery RW; Stelmachowicz PG
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):585-91. PubMed ID: 23446226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship of Grammatical Context on Children's Recognition of s/z-Inflected Words.
    Spratford M; McLean HH; McCreery R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):799-809. PubMed ID: 28972469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interactions Between Item Set and Vocoding in Serial Recall.
    Bosen AK; Luckasen MC
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1404-1417. PubMed ID: 31033634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of stimulus bandwidth on auditory skills in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Lewis DE; Choi S; Hoover B
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):483-94. PubMed ID: 17609611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.
    Tamati TN; Gilbert JL; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):616-34. PubMed ID: 24047949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Human Frequency Following Responses to Filtered Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Grinstead L; Yurjevich D
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(1):87-105. PubMed ID: 33369591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interdependence of linguistic and indexical speech perception skills in school-age children with early cochlear implantation.
    Geers AE; Davidson LS; Uchanski RM; Nicholas JG
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):562-74. PubMed ID: 23652814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship between speech perception in noise and phonological awareness skills for children with normal hearing.
    Lewis D; Hoover B; Choi S; Stelmachowicz P
    Ear Hear; 2010 Dec; 31(6):761-8. PubMed ID: 20562623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).
    Roman AS; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Faulkner KF
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):344-356. PubMed ID: 28045787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Task-Dependent Effects of Signal Audibility for Processing Speech: Comparing Performance With NAL-NL2 and DSL v5 Hearing Aid Prescriptions at Threshold and at Suprathreshold Levels in 9- to 17-Year-Olds With Hearing Loss.
    Pittman AL; Stewart EC
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231177509. PubMed ID: 37254534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Listening Effort and Speech Recognition with Frequency Compression Amplification for Children and Adults with Hearing Loss.
    Brennan MA; Lewis D; McCreery R; Kopun J; Alexander JM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):823-837. PubMed ID: 28972471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimal and Mild Hearing Loss in Children: Association with Auditory Perception, Cognition, and Communication Problems.
    Moore DR; Zobay O; Ferguson MA
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):720-732. PubMed ID: 31633598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preschool speech articulation and nonword repetition abilities may help predict eventual recovery or persistence of stuttering.
    Spencer C; Weber-Fox C
    J Fluency Disord; 2014 Sep; 41():32-46. PubMed ID: 25173455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictive Sentence Context Reduces Listening Effort in Older Adults With and Without Hearing Loss and With High and Low Working Memory Capacity.
    Hunter CR; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1164-1177. PubMed ID: 34983897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Rönnberg J; Rudner M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):272-286. PubMed ID: 29923867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of word recognition and word recall with bone conduction devices: do directional microphones free up cognitive resources?
    Westover L; Ostevik A; Aalto D; Cummine J; Hodgetts WE
    Int J Audiol; 2020 May; 59(5):367-373. PubMed ID: 32151192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.